relax strchrnul to LGPLv2+?

2009-09-08 Thread Jim Meyering
Hi Eric, I would like to use strchrnul in libvirt, but its license is listed at the default LGPL (as glibc-derived, I guess?) and that conflicts with libvirt's requirement for LGPLv2+. What do you think about relaxing it? Jim

Re: relax strchrnul to LGPLv2+?

2009-09-08 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Jim Meyering on 9/8/2009 3:17 AM: Hi Eric, I would like to use strchrnul in libvirt, but its license is listed at the default LGPL (as glibc-derived, I guess?) and that conflicts with libvirt's requirement for LGPLv2+. What do

Re: relax strchrnul to LGPLv2+?

2009-09-08 Thread Jim Meyering
Eric Blake wrote: According to Jim Meyering on 9/8/2009 3:17 AM: Hi Eric, I would like to use strchrnul in libvirt, but its license is listed at the default LGPL (as glibc-derived, I guess?) and that conflicts with libvirt's requirement for LGPLv2+. What do you think about relaxing it?

Re: relax strchrnul to LGPLv2+?

2009-09-08 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Jim Meyering on 9/8/2009 6:32 AM: What do you think about relaxing it? Done. Thanks! As I tried to use that module in libvirt, I now see that its dependent module, rawmemchr (also LGPL) needs the same treatment. So, if you