On 9/22/20 10:03 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
I'm not really familiar with these. Does the libgcrypt documentation help,
maybe?
Bruno
I have become much more familiar that I'd really like to be. It seems
that without the crypto/gc-pbkdf2-sha1 module defined, then
GNULIB_GC_HMAC_SHA1
Hi Bruce,
> The failing difference isn't whether or not I use gc_pbkdf2_hmac vs.
> gc_pbkdf2_sha1, the failing difference is whether or not I specify the
> crypto/gc-pbkdf2-sha1 module vs. the crypto/gc-pbkdf2 module.
I'm not really familiar with these. Does the libgcrypt documenta
Hi Bruno, et al.,
The failing difference isn't whether or not I use gc_pbkdf2_hmac vs.
gc_pbkdf2_sha1, the failing difference is whether or not I specify the
crypto/gc-pbkdf2-sha1 module vs. the crypto/gc-pbkdf2 module. The former
works, the latter does not, with the rest of my project
DF2,// <-- pbkdf2 reprocessing count
hash_output, hash_out_len);
if (rc != GC_OK)
die(GNU_PW_MGR_EXIT_INVALID, pbkdf2_err_fmt, rc);
On 9/18/20 9:32 AM, Bruno Haible wrote:
Hi Bruce,
Next question: what do I do about crypto/gc-pbkdf2-sha1? It is labeled
as "
Hi Bruce,
> Next question: what do I do about crypto/gc-pbkdf2-sha1? It is labeled
> as "deprecated", but I need a function that produces precisely the same
> result. It really doesn't matter to me that folks have figured out how
> to jigger a file to produce an arbitrary
Hi Bruno, et al.,
Next question: what do I do about crypto/gc-pbkdf2-sha1? It is labeled
as "deprecated", but I need a function that produces precisely the same
result. It really doesn't matter to me that folks have figured out how
to jigger a file to produce an arbitrary sha1 s
Hello, all. When importing some gnulib code to GRUB2 I stumbled across
lib / gc-pbkdf2-sha1.c having comments taken from RFC2898. As far as I
know RFC licence prohibits modifications. This seems to be GPL-incompatible.
So is there are any licencing problem with this file?
Thanks in advance
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko phco...@gmail.com writes:
Hello, all. When importing some gnulib code to GRUB2 I stumbled across
lib / gc-pbkdf2-sha1.c having comments taken from RFC2898. As far as I
know RFC licence prohibits modifications. This seems to be GPL-incompatible.
So
Paul Eggert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simon Josefsson wrote:
+ l = dkLen / hLen;
+ if (dkLen % hLen)
+l++;
An equivalent but faster code is:
l = ((dkLen - 1) / hLen) + 1;
Perhaps for clarity
+++ ChangeLog 12 Oct 2005 13:12:56 -
@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
2005-10-12 Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ * modules/gc-pbkdf2-sha1, modules/gc-pbkdf2-sha1-tests: New files.
+
+ * tests/test-gc-pbkdf2-sha1.c: New file.
+
+2005-10-12 Simon Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED
for gnulib yet? Has it been rejected?
Index: lib/gc-pbkdf2-sha1.c
===
RCS file: lib/gc-pbkdf2-sha1.c
diff -N lib/gc-pbkdf2-sha1.c
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -
+++ lib/gc-pbkdf2-sha1.c 12 Oct 2005 13:12:57 -
*snip
Hi Ralf! Thanks for your comments..
Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
By the way, has anyone suggested to use one of these documentation-
from-source-comments generators for gnulib yet? Has it been rejected?
I don't think anyone has proposed it. I'm somewhat biased towards
GTK-DOC
Simon Josefsson wrote:
+ l = dkLen / hLen;
+ if (dkLen % hLen)
+l++;
An equivalent but faster code is:
l = ((dkLen - 1) / hLen) + 1;
Bruno
___
bug-gnulib mailing list
bug-gnulib@gnu.org
Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simon Josefsson wrote:
+ l = dkLen / hLen;
+ if (dkLen % hLen)
+l++;
An equivalent but faster code is:
l = ((dkLen - 1) / hLen) + 1;
Perhaps for clarity we could change it into:
#define CEIL_DIV(a,b) (((a) - 1) / (b)) + 1
l = CEIL_DIV
Simon Josefsson wrote:
Perhaps for clarity we could change it into:
#define CEIL_DIV(a,b) (((a) - 1) / (b)) + 1
l = CEIL_DIV (dkLen, hLen);
What do you think?
People could be tempted to borrow this formula and apply to situations where
it doesn't fit.
Normally one uses
#define
15 matches
Mail list logo
