Re: prepare for autoconf-2.60

2006-04-20 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: + But about AC_CHECK_DECLS_ONCE: note that in + autoconf = 2.60 the symbol separator is a comma, whereas here it is + whitespace. I hadn't noticed this incompatibility. It is a real hassle. The comma separator in autoconf's AC_CHECK_DECLS is a hassle, because it's the

Re: prepare for autoconf-2.60

2006-04-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Paul Eggert wrote on Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 01:50:48AM CEST: Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: + But about AC_CHECK_DECLS_ONCE: note that in + autoconf = 2.60 the symbol separator is a comma, whereas here it is + whitespace. I hadn't noticed this incompatibility. It is a real

prepare for autoconf-2.60

2006-04-19 Thread Bruno Haible
Hi, It appears that autoconf-2.60 may be released soon. I added comments to longdouble.m4 and onceonly.m4 relating to the new macros in autoconf-2.59d. I also propose a similar comment to extensions.m4, see below. Bruno diff -c -3 -r1.5 longdouble.m4 *** longdouble.m4 18 Jan 2005 13:07:56

Re: prepare for autoconf-2.60

2006-04-19 Thread Paul Eggert
Bruno Haible [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I also propose a similar comment to extensions.m4, see below. Thanks, I installed that. + But about AC_CHECK_DECLS_ONCE: note that in + autoconf = 2.60 the symbol separator is a comma, whereas here it is + whitespace. I hadn't noticed this