The list of outstanding reports that should be closed

2000-06-02 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
Here is the list of outstanding reports that should be closed. Gordon, if you have any question, feel free to ask me. * #35414: grub: Doesn't detect hdc/hdd partition That was just because his BIOS didn't support more than two drives. Not a GRUB bug. * #35850: grub: stage1 does not work as

Bug#65105: grub: When texinfo is not available dpkg refuses to install the package.

2000-06-02 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: Manuel Subject: Re: Date: Fri, But in its current form, no info documentation is generated, it doesn't even check for the existence of makeinfo. aclocal.m4 must be modified and at least autoconf ran. I think you misunderstand something. makeinfo is necessary only when you build

Bug#65105: grub: When texinfo is not available dpkg refuses to install the package.

2000-06-02 Thread Manuel Estrada
On 2 Jun 2000, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote: Manuel Estrada writes: ME I do have autoconf v2.13-20, automake v1.4-8 and makeinfo ME 4.0-4, but using them is even worse: From INSTALL: If you'd like to develop GRUB, these below are also required. Don't forget to specify the option

Re: The list of outstanding reports that should be closed

2000-06-02 Thread Khimenko Victor
3-Jun-00 02:35 you wrote: * #61513: enabling `lba-support-bitmap-check' marks some systems unbootable That was just because he forgot to specify the option `--enable-lba-support-bitmap-check' for the configure script. Not a GRUB bug. Moreover, I've already changed the check to an

Again, serial stuff under GRUB.

2000-06-02 Thread Christoph Plattner
Yesterday I worked on the support for the serial GRUB console. For some target machines at home I needed it again and I try to collect experience in this stuff. For the use here at home, I reprogrammed a solution using a macro to decide in compile time the use of serial or pc console. By this I

Re: The list of outstanding reports that should be closed

2000-06-02 Thread OKUJI Yoshinori
From: "Khimenko Victor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: The list of outstanding reports that should be closed Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 23:11:09 +0400 (MSD) Someone can explain from WHERE this weird check come anyway ? That seems to be introduced by my incaution. The right implementation is in