$B(.(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(/(B
(B online$B%K%e!<%9!!!c(B2005.5$BH/9T!d(B
(B $B(1(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(0(B
(B
$B!Z"-%*%9%9%a>pJs![(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,!y(B
Title: PROMOCIONES
SI
NO PUEDE VER ESTE CORREO POR FAVOR PRESIONE AQU
Kevin Ryde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think that function ever returns, gcc probably shouldn't
complain about such cases.
__attribute__((noreturn)) may be helpful in that case.
paul
___
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
I find myself fascinating. Aptitude found in the understanding and is often
inherited. Genius coming from reason and imagination, rarely.
Hey man, here's that site I was telling you about. They are offering huge
discounts now on Pen1s Enhanchement Pathches
A top team of British scientists and
Am 07.05.05 schrieb KevinRyde:
Werner Scheinast [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Wall
Did you add that? It's probably not a good idea.
No, it was done automatically. (Or can there be a system-wide default
option string?) I only added some processor optimization.
scmsigs.c: In function
Werner Scheinast wrote:
scmsigs.c: In function `signal_delivery_thread':
scmsigs.c:152: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void
When I follow Paul's suggestion and add __attribute__((noreturn)) before
the function name (right?), it doesn't change anything.
Perhaps the
$B5W$7$V$j!A!*CQ$:$+$7$$F02h(B
$B8+$F$k$H;W$$=P$7$F!"%^%?JQ$K$J$C$A$c$$$=!A!#!#(B
$B$F$+!"$3$N3QEY%9%-$C!*!*$d$C$Q(B $BN)$A%P%C%/(B
$B$+$J$!(B($B!f"`!e(B)/
$B%O%O%O!#%"%?%^$NCf$,??$CGr$K$J$k$/$i$$(B $BFM$-%"%2$i$l$F$k(B
$B$C$F%+%s%8$G!#!#(B
$B$[$s$H!"%/%;$K$J$j$=$)!*(B
(B
_/_/_/_/_/$B5U1g!y?M:[EMAIL PROTECTED](BSM$B!yB(2q$$!yD%aDEE(B_/_/_/_/_/
_/_/_/_/_/_/ http://awg.webchu.com/?springl _/_/_/_/_/_/
$B!xBg9%I!V(B1$B1_!WL5NA%]%$%s%HB#Dh%-%c%s%Z!%s7QB3B;\Cf!*!x(B
$B$?$/$5$s$N$*5RMM$K$4MxMQD:$-!OF|4n$S$N@$rD:$$$F$*$j$^$9!*(B
