FWIW, Guile 1.8.8 produces same output as ‘ok’ on a similar (sans the
‘use-modules’ and ‘uniform-vector-element-size’ noise) input, so i think
this situation is a regression. Am i missing something?
--
Thien-Thi Nguyen
GPG key: 4C807502
(if you're human and you know it)
read my lisp
programmers to learn how and when to say no.
--
Thien-Thi Nguyen
GPG key: 4C807502
pgp8YeIY0NhOd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
() Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com
() Thu, 07 Mar 2013 20:21:53 +0100
[...] Dunno.
As an experiment, i've changed the cc to bug-guile in this response.
Maybe that will work. Anyway, i'll followup w/ the debbugs folks.
--
Thien-Thi Nguyen
GPG key: 4C807502
))
in test/leak.scm. A related issue is how the error is reported. It
seems strange that the file is unknown.
--
Thien-Thi Nguyen . GPG key: 4C807502
. NB: ttn at glug dot org is not me .
. (and has not been
() Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com
() Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:41:42 +0200
I realize that this is irritating to you, but it is the right thing,
improves the situation for loads of users, and is largely compatible.
I think when you say it is the right thing, you are missing the point.
Try to jump up
() Mark Harig idirect...@aim.com
() Tue, 15 Feb 2011 22:03:39 -0500
(Why do they miss the large similarities but see the small differences?)
This is a human condition that afflicts even programmers.
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30167
Summary: func-name (#define FUNC_NAME) check not applied
fully
Project: Guile
Submitted by: ttn
Submitted on: gio 17 giu 2010 14:42:17 CEST
Category: None
Update of bug #30167 (project guile):
Summary: func-name (#define FUNC_NAME) check not applied
fully = libguile/Makefile.am ugly
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
Actually, both those files are indeed checked, so this is really
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:54:05 +0100
Is the warning correct?
Of course it is! :-)
I don't understand the question or the answer.
(That is, what does correct mean?)
Does this mean i'm not being cavalier in the right way?
thi
() Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net
() Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:28:07 +
I'm sorry, I should have been clearer. correct would mean
that the bug, and hence the fix needed, is in the code that the
warning is pointing to. As opposed to the warning-generation
code itself being bugged.
There was a warning in about possibly undefined `make-glil-local'
in module/language/glil/decompile-assembly.scm and indeed i can't
find that symbol anywhere...
(This is from a make clean ; make, but i unfortunately deleted
the *Compilation* buffer.)
thi
../../GG/libguile/read.c: In function 'scm_read_expression':
../../GG/libguile/read.c:893: warning: 'charname' may be used uninitialized in
this function
From 030349a79946f992eb2bd58653c39321e9794e95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:49:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Use `mkstemp' instead of `mktemp'.
* test-suite/standalone/test-unwind.c (check_ports):
Use `mkstemp' instead of `mktemp'.
Signed
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:02:47 +0100
I would advise adding explanatory comments in the code,
rather than in the log.
Good point. Will keep it in mind.
thi
() Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com
() Wed, 13 Jan 2010 20:52:08 +0100
I figured out how to use shell-command-on-region, M-|, so I
don't care any more about whether there's comments before or
after, though Ludovic is probably right about where they should
go. So submit as you like.
See
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Tue, 12 Jan 2010 18:19:44 +0100
| dnl See note for PKG_CHECK_MODULES in aclocal.m4.
| PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG
| if test $BDW_GC_CFLAGS || test $BDW_GC_LIBS ; then :
| dnl We don't need to declare those env vars precious;
| dnl
() Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com
() Sat, 09 Jan 2010 23:31:55 +0100
.pc file, you can work around this by setting some environment
-variables before running ./configure:
+as part of the configure command-line:
Can you fix this one and resend?
Yes, if you can tell me
___
Fix bug: Init auto var to unrandomize `stack_depth' rv.
* stacks.c (stack_depth): Init `n'.
Signed-off-by: Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org
---
libguile/stacks.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff
7a7b846cc2eb1f6aadfb06ccb445642f2bc2dfa7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 10:07:48 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Update configure script hints wrt precious env vars.
* README: Don't suggest setting vars before running configure.
Instead, suggest specifying them on the configure
As advertized...
thi
___
From e08a92c5f21bab837ab051f5f1866cd066938262 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 15:05:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Add cast in `make_vm' to silence
17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 22:40:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix bug: Don't clobber `PKG_CONFIG' when overriding pkg-config
search for bdw-gw.
* configure.ac (PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG): New top-level call.
(PKG_CHECK_MODULES): Call only if both vars
() Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com
() Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:23:07 +0100
However the use case is important. We need to implement a (current-file)
macro, I think, which should allow for file-relative loads.
Is `current-load-port' still around for official Guile?
If so,
(define (current-file)
() Bill Schottstaedt b...@ccrma.stanford.edu
() Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:10:09 -0700
code to implement #|..|# block comment processing triggers either a
glibc memory complaint or a segfault.
FWIW, below is the implementation from Guile 1.4.1.118 (not yet released).
It handles nesting (per R6RS,
FYI, below is the code that all ci comparison
funcs will be using in the next Guile 1.4.x release.
This means, for example:
(char-ci? #\a #\_) = #f.
thi
___
// libguile/chars.c
#define ISLOWER(c) (islower (c) ? (1 + c - 'a') :
() Bill Schottstaedt b...@ccrma.stanford.edu
() Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:55:21 -0800
Why do both Guile and Gauche give this result in string-ci?
(and the other string-ci functions similarly):
The odd chars are ASCII 91 to 96:
ASCII 91-96 lie between the two ranges A-Z and a-z.
One procedure
before, we see:
(guile-user) (port-column (current-output-port))
13
after, we see:
(guile-user) (port-column (current-output-port))
0
here is the ChangeLog entry for guile 1.4.x:
2007-11-13 Thien-Thi Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* running-repls.scm (scm-style-repl consume-trailing
() Gregory Marton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
() Sun, 03 Jun 2007 01:29:35 +
This used to work in guile 1.3.4 but I haven't
checked the versions in between.
data point:
guile (version)
1.4.1.107.9.0.7
guile (regexp-exec (make-regexp .) (string #\nul))
#f
thi
() [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès)
() Fri, 11 May 2007 09:16:31 +0200
So your fix seems reasonable, _provided_ `guile-www' doesn't rely on
string mutations and interactions between substrings and their parent
string.
the easy way is to use configure script option --disable-shsub. i
() [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès)
() Fri, 11 May 2007 16:43:09 +0200
Nice that it can detect such things and adapt!
that's the theory, anyway.
However, the `s/make-shared-substring/substring/' occurs only at
module-installation time, which precludes one from running the examples
direct this question to its maintainer, Thien-Thi Nguyen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (not sure whether he reads this list).
the error seemed to emanate from __scm.h. unfortunately, the grep
output was not useful to figure out the nature of the problem. perhaps
grep -C 10 will show more info.
thi
From: Aaron Voisine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:42:59 -0700
I'm trying to compile guile 1.4 with apple's gcc 4.0.0 (from xcode
tools 2.2 preview 1) and I get the following compilation error:
[...]
../libguile/alist.x:5: error: stray '##' in program
looking
From: Alan Grover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 21:16:26 -0400
This script [...]
thanks for posting this. i have touched it up a bit (attached), and
used it to verify operation of recently installed changes to cgi.scm
(available, along w/ other changes, from cvs). the not
From: Alan Grover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:10:24 -0400
cgi.scm
286c286
(and p (subs pair 0 p
---
(and p (url-coding:decode (subs pair 0 p)
thanks, installed.
here is the ChangeLog entry i used:
2005-04-12 Alan Grover [EMAIL
From: Robert Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 15:38:17 +0800
I happened accross a bug in the HTTP module of guile-www which seemed to
trigger when I visited a page which gave no headers and just whitespace
in the body. In such a case the variable second of
From: Michael A. Wells [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 22:36:26 -0500 (CDT)
Although this problem is present in Guile-1.6.4, the problem dates
back to at least Guile 1.4.
thanks for the bug report. i have started to clean up the 1.4.x branch
(in cvs) as a result. the
From: Thamer Al-Harbash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 10:53:34 -0400 (EDT)
This cgi::make-cookie breaks under guile-1.6 because it's using a
#key and the (bound?) macro which seem to be no longer available
or depreciated. Please accept my patch below which fixes the
From: Thamer Al-Harbash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:00:57 -0400 (EDT)
If this patch works fine with the optargs module why not use it
for the sake of simplicity? Does my patch break something?
the optargs module has an interface and a name. its interface was
changed
From: Sysoltsev, Vyatcheslav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 09:03:57 +0400
Starting from 8.0 Intel compiler defines GNUC macroses.
that's very strange (IMHO). anyway, does the intel compiler have plans
to support ia64 inline asm in the future? we would have to change the
From: Sysoltsev, Vyatcheslav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 13:49:20 +0400
No, Intel compiler doesn't plan to support ia64 asm inlines in
foreseeable future.
looking at __scm.h closely, i see the inline asm is just an
implementation detail of SCM_FENCE, but SCM_FENCE is
From: Wolfgang Jaehrling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 17:30:25 +0100
made unambigous. In any case, _something_ is wrong here. :-)
no worries, just figure out what is unambiguous and strive to emulate.
i have seen in scripts: (exit #f).
thi
From: Michael Burschik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 08:31:05 +0100
I downloaded the archive gush-0.0b.tar.gz from
http://www.glug.org/people/ttn/software/gush/ and built it successfully.
Whenever I try to run gush, however, I get the following error:
Initializing
From: Jose Roberto B. de A. Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:50:39 -0300
In guile-www package: in http:request procedure, I am sending a patch
to support virtual hosts retrieving.
thanks for the patch. currently low-bandwidth, will probably take a
look at it in a
From: Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 06 Jan 2003 19:55:26 +
... but it fails. Any idea why?
what messages do you see?
thi
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
From: Aurelien Chanudet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 16:06:02 +0100
Would anyone be
interested in a patch ?
if the patch is small, post it to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
thanks,
thi
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Stephen Compall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:11:41 -0500
2002-10-26 Stephen Compall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* scheme-data.texi: Addition and change of many Texinfo tags,
particularly usage of @var and @samp, as well as reformatting of
From: Stephen Compall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:48:53 -0600
Have done. /me foolishly overlooked (guile)Manual Conventions, and
drew mental connection to many typos of if.? :-S
no worries.
http://csserver.evansville.edu/~sc87/scheme-data-2S11.patch
thanks.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:03:19 +0200
(define (mydatetoweeknumber dt) [...])
Is my solution acceptable? If not, is there anyone who can implement
a better solution?
looks like your solution codifies ISO-8601, but srfi-19 does not specify
ISO-8601. if it
From: Michael Carmack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 08:21:18 +
Is guile-oops/1.0.2 not intended to be used with guile/1.4.1?
more like guile-snarf invocation changing should be considered a bug,
especially in light of 1.4.x goal of compatibility (mea culpa)! i've
since
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 20:20:48 -0700
i have experimented w/ back-porting the new popen.scm (including
associated support in libguile) w/o success [...]
turns out i was laboring under the classic stupidity of forgetting to
unpack an SCM
From: Satoru Takabayashi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 22:56:57 +0900
I tried guile 1.4.1 and found a problem on open-output-pipe.
hi, thanks for the bug report. i have reproduced the problem and
noticed that it is gone in guile-HEAD, but have not yet figured out
which of
From: David Hull [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 12:53:32 -0700
I just downloaded what I thought was the latest version, which
reports (version) as 1.4. The guile-xlib configure script checks
for (string= (version) 1.4.1) and then reports that my guile is
too old.
did
fyi, i've added this as:
1007-cc-optimizations-break-r4rs-test
thi
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
From: Christopher Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 13:44:11 -0500
Index: ice-9/optargs.scm
thanks for the patch. i've applied it for 1.4.2.
thi
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: richmit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 23:12:11 -0500
After struggling for a few hours I have finally managed to get guile
to build on MacOS X. In order to do this, I had to remove readline
from my development system -- I don't know how to get guile to build
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Jarc)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 12:02:21 -0400
I have guile 1.4.1 installed in an unusual place, so PREFIX/lib isn't
in the usual search path for shared libraries. It seems guile should
always search PREFIX/lib, preferably before the systemwide
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Jarc)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 13:57:39 -0400
but it would still be nice if guile could tell libtool where to look
for libguilereadline.la, since it's known to be in PREFIX/lib.
yes. btw, another (smaller scope) fix would be to munge readline.scm
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 03:58:51 +0300
obvious enough.
presuming you encountered this w/ guile-1.4, you should check out:
ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/guile/guile-1.4.1.tar.gz
(it has this fix and other changes -- see NEWS).
thi
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wolfgang_J=E4hrling?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 08:04:20 +0200
AFAIK, the glibc-people are rewriting the regex code for 2.3, because
the current implementation got unmaintainable and has various strange
limitations. This could be one of those.
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:29:40 -0700
i traced this to `regexec' (glibc 2.2.4) and stopped -- it's not a guile
bug after all, as far as i could tell. (also, could not reproduce the
behavior under FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE.)
probably time
thanks for the report. this will be fixed along w/ some other things in
guile 1.4.1 release -- see guile web pages for details on how to get a
cvs checkout (cvs module hack).
i am curious: what is your use for guile?
thi
___
Bug-guile mailing list
From: Davide Angelocola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 3 May 2002 13:18:23 +0200
I've downloaded guile version 1.4 to learn on how to program
in C under UNIX. However, when I try to compile it on my
RedHat 7.2 machine I get an error in net_db.c line 85. Well, I've
just put a
in branch_release-1-6 ice-9/Makefile.am, we use `install-data-local' to
install and-let*.scm. w/ automake 1.5 (no idea what was before), this
frag is run before the rest of the install, and fails if there is no
destination directory already set up. the failure is masked by the -
action prefix,
From: Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 02 May 2002 13:59:06 +0100
- SCM_SETCAR (SCM_CAR (env), scm_cons (n, SCM_CAR (SCM_CAR (env;
The copy in scm_unmemocopy, which looks as though it might be
intended to fix this problem [...]
was this used previously? (i'm trying
well, good and bad news.
the good news is that another guile project was recently added to the
projects list. the bad news is that for www.gnu.org, template.scm now
fails due to unfulfilled regexp matching. (this has resulted in an
empty project page there.) below is a test case that
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 23:47:13 +0200
| guile (test ok)
| string-length 42 = ok
| guile (test (+space ok 11672))
| string-length 11714 = ok
| guile (test (+space ok 11673))
| string-length 11715 = ok
| guile (test (+space ok
From: Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:10:56 -0500
I've been trying to make sure to migrate all my 1.6 patches to HEAD,
but there are still some outstanding. Of course some of the lag is
because I'm not sure we'll want to handle things the same in 1.8.
From: Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:42:58 -0500
Depends on the problem. For example, the recent library name changes
relating to libltdl/dlopen issues may or may not belong in HEAD, but
they're critical for 1.6.
the recent changes may or may not belong
From: Rob Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:09:04 -0500
Furthermore, as I've said several times before,
this should give you a clue that saying things on mailing lists isn't as
useful to other people understanding you, as writing them down somewhere
under workbook/
From: Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 08 Apr 2002 18:45:44 +0200
A VPATH build is when you compile in a directory other than the source
directory. This is useful when you want to compile a package for
different configurations but from a common source. The name stems
From: Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 08 Apr 2002 00:22:35 +0200
(One tempting thing is
to not distribute TODO at all.)
i wouldn't mind if we didn't distribute TODO.
thi
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 08 Apr 2002 00:55:38 +0200
Sigh, I've seen this coming...
guile-snarf writes its $cleanfile into the $srcdir, which is not a
supported thing to do during a VPATH build.
looks like some coding cowboy should've figured out what kind of
From: David C Sterratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 12:55:24 +0100
$ ./autogen.sh .
aclocal: configure.in: 167: macro `AM_PROG_LIBTOOL' not found in library
I'm using autoconf version 2.53 and automake 1.4p5
Should I be using different versions? Or is there some
From: Neil W. Van Dyke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 02:00:06 -0500
If I understand Bug 11 correctly, then it appears to be a very
different problem than the one I report.
what you request for consideration must surely have been considered
before. if we figure out
From: David C Sterratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 14:57:11 +
In libguile/scmconfig.h I see:
/* Define if the system has the type `uintptr_t'. */
/* #undef HAVE_UINTPTR_T */
I can't find any references to SIZEOF_UINTPTR_T, UINTPTR_MAX,
INTPTR_MAX and
From: M Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:50:42 -0500
[new test case triggering different symptoms]
debug eval (the-environment)
you like torturing guile don't you?
I don't know if this helps or sends you off in another direction.
i've recorded both test
From: Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 08 Mar 2002 23:53:35 +
I'd say it's a bug, and that it would be better to squash it now than
to support strange expectations through 1.6.x.
it's also a bug in the sense that side-effects on load (except for
`define') are usually
From: David C Sterratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:42:44 +
Running gcc -E tags.h shows that
typedef scm_t_bits SCM;
is the line included.
ok, next we need to chase down the resolved C type for scm_t_bits,
which depends on HAVE_UINTPTR_T.
on a (32-bit) x86
From: Christopher Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 00:26:24 -0600
There are two grammatical errors in the comments for
resolve-interface in boot-9.scm. This is a patch for stable;
it also applies to unstable.
thanks. applied.
thi
From: Alex Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:53:36 -0500
The goops manual printed reasonably, whereas the
goops-tutorial was junk.
the tutorial is in the manual.
thi
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: David C Sterratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:58:25 +
Thanks for you message. Here's what I see when using ./check-guile
--debug at the end:
[tests: srfi-19, srfi-4, time]
looks like two main problem areas: time and uniform vectors.
the first area is a
From: Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 03 Feb 2002 13:44:29 +
Using the current unstable CVS Guile...
Running under gdb, type in the following:
fwiw, i was able to reproduce the described behavior.
feel free to add this to BUGS...
thi
From: Bill Schottstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 03:51:54 -0800
Can I suggest a change in libguile/gsubr.c line 105 from:
fputs (ERROR in scm_c_make_gsubr: too many args\n, stderr);
to
fprintf (stderr, ERROR in scm_c_make_gsubr: too many args (%d)
From: Dave Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 05 Feb 2002 16:21:32 +
Don't the dependencies take care of CVS updates, as one would expect?
If not, the ANON-CVS instructions should say so.
actually, to avoid (a more fundamental kind of) confusion, auto* tools
side-step explicit version
From: Martin Grabmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:28:14 +0100 (MET)
make maintainer-clean; cvs update; ./autogen.sh;
./configure --enable-maintainer-mode --with-threads; make;
su; make install prefix=/usr/local/stow/guile-1.5.4; cd /usr/local/stow;
stow
From: Dave Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 15 Jan 2002 11:58:32 +
I don't know which headers one should include for UINTPTR_MAX,
INTPTR_MAX on random systems, so I haven't tried the autoconfiscation.
could you post the output of:
grep PTR config.status
?
thanks,
thi
From: fabrice bauzac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 15:39:31 +0100
Done!
applied! (to unstable branch, that is. application to the stable
branch was not clean, although in the end, i was able to hunt down most
of the .rej hunks, and check in spellfixes.)
many thanks. i
From: fabrice bauzac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:41:20 +0100
The error in http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/anon-cvs.html
misdirected me.
thanks for the report. fixed.
thi
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: fabrice bauzac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 11:00:25 +0100
Hey, where should that information go then? All the information
about scm_boot_guile is located there! I had to browse Guile's
sources in order to see the argument order.
docs are improving steadily
From: Fabrice Bauzac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002 13:18:06 +0100
[misspelling]
thanks.
it would be nice if someone wrote a spellcheck script that we could add
to guile-tools. could you do that?
thi
___
Bug-guile mailing list
From: Fabrice Bauzac [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2002 14:14:36 +0100
Let's make that sentence clearer:
because this is the intro, i think it's ok to leave out details like
call-argument order.
thi
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL
From: john lin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:10:40 -0800 (PST)
Please advise.
i see the same behavior on my guile, but it doesn't bother me because
normally, boot-9.scm is loaded automatically as a part of guile startup;
i've never needed to load it manually.
thi
From: Chris Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 12:32:32 -0600
-in compination with @code{crypt}, that is why it appears in this
+in combination with @code{crypt}, that is why it appears in this
thanks... fixed in repo.
thi
From: Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13 Nov 2001 00:34:11 +0100
The behavior of Guile mirrors that of Common Lisp here, so I think we
should keep it. Together with :allow-other-keys, you need :rest to
get at the other keys; and without :allow-other-keys, :rest makes not
From: Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 11 Nov 2001 21:46:45 +
M-x load-file RET .../doc/maint/docstring.el RET
M-x docstring-process-module RET (guile) RET
Save all modified .texi files and copy the current libguile/guile.texi
to doc/maint/guile.texi, then commit.
From: Scott Lenser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 06:05:29 -0500
Part of the documentation for string-null? is incorrect where it says
nonzero, it means zero.
thanks for the bug report.
fixed in libguile/strop.c -- however, i need to familiarize myself w/
doc snarfing
From: Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 11 Nov 2001 21:46:45 +
M-x load-file RET .../doc/maint/docstring.el RET
M-x docstring-process-module RET (guile) RET
Save all modified .texi files and copy the current libguile/guile.texi
to doc/maint/guile.texi, then commit.
the code following produces this output (w/ guile -s bug.scm)
on guile-1.5.4:
(#procedure good x ())
(#procedure good x (1))
(#procedure good x ((1 2 3)))
(#procedure blah x JAY KAY (#:j JAY #:k KAY))
(#procedure blah x JAY KAY (#:j JAY #:k KAY 1))
(#procedure blah x JAY KAY (#:j JAY
From: Manuel Giraud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 06 Nov 2001 18:32:32 +0100
But does anyone know which version correct this bug? Because, I just
download guile-1.5.4, and I'm able to reproduce it (not downloading,
the bug ;-).
w/ fresh cvs guile (stable), the program prints out about
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 16:43:45 -0800
bug-guile cc'ed.
this is now bug 9 (in cvs both branches).
thi
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
From: Ian Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 10:34:00 +
guile-1.5.4 looks good! I got a compile error when using
--disable-deprecated. Here's a patch:
thanks for the patch. unfortunately, i believe it is counter to the
recent (non-published except in mailing list
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
