Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marius == Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marius Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not convinced. How can people be expecting debugging to be turned
on after having explicitly said `(debug-disable 'debug)' in
Marius == Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marius Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marius == Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marius Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not convinced. How can people be expecting debugging to be turned
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marius == Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marius Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This bug has been fixed in unstable CVS, by removing the lines at the
end of (ice-9 debug) that unconditionally enable debugging. Is there
Marius == Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marius Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not convinced. How can people be expecting debugging to be turned
on after having explicitly said `(debug-disable 'debug)' in their
.guile file?
Marius Because
This bug has been fixed in unstable CVS, by removing the lines at the
end of (ice-9 debug) that unconditionally enable debugging. Is there
any reason why we shouldn't fix it in the same way on the stable
branch?
Neil
___
Bug-guile mailing
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This bug has been fixed in unstable CVS, by removing the lines at the
end of (ice-9 debug) that unconditionally enable debugging. Is there
any reason why we shouldn't fix it in the same way on the stable
branch?
This change would be too far reaching
Marius == Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marius Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This bug has been fixed in unstable CVS, by removing the lines at the
end of (ice-9 debug) that unconditionally enable debugging. Is there
any reason why we shouldn't fix it in
From: Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 08 Mar 2002 23:53:35 +
I'd say it's a bug, and that it would be better to squash it now than
to support strange expectations through 1.6.x.
it's also a bug in the sense that side-effects on load (except for
`define') are usually
