Re: Fix for 1001-local-eval-error-backtrace-segfaults - please review

2002-05-18 Thread Neil Jerram
thi == Thien-Thi Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: thiFrom: Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] thiDate: 05 May 2002 15:00:59 +0100 thiNo; the new way doesn't mutate at all. It creates a new thienvironment that shares some substructure with the old thi

Re: Fix for 1001-local-eval-error-backtrace-segfaults - please review

2002-05-11 Thread Neil Jerram
Marius == Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Marius Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: OK. Any thoughts on whether this is worth putting into the stable branch as well? I assume it's Rob's decision... Marius If I understand the issue right (which I probably don't),

Re: Fix for 1001-local-eval-error-backtrace-segfaults - please review

2002-05-05 Thread Neil Jerram
thi == Thien-Thi Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: thiFrom: Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] thiDate: 02 May 2002 13:59:06 +0100 thiThe copy in scm_unmemocopy, which looks as though it might be thiintended to fix this problem [...] thi was this used previously?

Fix for 1001-local-eval-error-backtrace-segfaults - please review

2002-05-02 Thread Neil Jerram
Patch --- /home/neil/Guile/1.6/guile-core/libguile/eval.c.old Thu May 2 12:45:56 2002 +++ /home/neil/Guile/1.6/guile-core/libguile/eval.c Thu May 2 12:46:21 2002 @@ -1417,7 +1417,9 @@ ls = scm_cons (scm_sym_define, z = scm_cons (n = SCM_CAR (x),

Re: Fix for 1001-local-eval-error-backtrace-segfaults - please review

2002-05-02 Thread Thien-Thi Nguyen
From: Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 02 May 2002 13:59:06 +0100 - SCM_SETCAR (SCM_CAR (env), scm_cons (n, SCM_CAR (SCM_CAR (env; The copy in scm_unmemocopy, which looks as though it might be intended to fix this problem [...] was this used previously? (i'm trying