If Guile CVS is built with --disable-deprecated GCC 3.4 fails to build
eval.c. The problem is that the function scm_macroexp() is used in
line 1941 of eval.c. The prototype is not declared in eval.h if
deprecated functions are disabled and the function definition starts
further below in line
On HP-UX, the macros MIN and MAX are defined in sys/param.h which is
included by limits.h. There's an unconditional definition of MIN in
the CVS version of numbers.c which clashes with HP's definition.
Here's the error message:
./guile-snarf -o numbers.x numbers.c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-I.. -I..
The time zone CET does not exist on HP-UX. The following patch
modifies srfi-19.test so that the time zone MEZ-1MESZ is used on
HP-UX.
Index: srfi-19.test
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/guile/guile/guile-core/test-suite/tests/srfi-19.test,v
I'm wondering whether the second date-week-number test at the end of
srfi-19.test or the SRFI 19 implementation is broken.
The second tests is supposed to return 0:
(with-test-prefix date-week-number
(pass-if (= 0 (date-week-number (make-date 0 0 0 0 1 1 1984 0) 0)))
(pass-if (= 0
Subject: line 82 in libguile/num2integral.c
this one better?
otherwise i get address of __gmpz_fits_[su]int_p will always evaluate to true
when compiling with gcc-cvs and halts with an error.
diff -Naur guile-core.orig/libguile/num2integral.i.c
guile-core/libguile/num2integral.i.c
---
While browsing Guile's regression tests I came across the following
test which checks the procedure date-week-number:
(with-test-prefix date-week-number
(pass-if (= 0 (date-week-number (make-date 0 0 0 0 1 1 1984 0) 0)))
(pass-if (= 0 (date-week-number (make-date 0 0 0 0 7 1 1984 0)
Mauro #
The cablefilterz will allow you to receive
all the channels that you order with your remote control,}
payperviews,aXXXmovies,sport events,special-events*
http://www.9001hosting.com/cable/
procreate ,baptist .
___
Bug-guile mailing list
Andreas Vögele [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suggest to remove the MIN macro from numbers.c. Instead, the lower
case macro min, which is definded in _scm.h anyway, can be used.
Sounds fair.
I'm wondering why the MIN macro was introduced at all.
I think I missed seeing that min() existed
