thi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a while ago, i submitted a small patch to address the situation
where aclocal and libtool are installed w/ different PREFIX.
perhaps this is the problem (still)? (insert standard grumble about
dropped patches here.)
I'm not opposed to this change, but I
Mikael Djurfeldt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But, as you previously suggested, it is not sensible to try to
continue executing code after a segv. That *kind* of signals should
cause immediate abort, I think.
Ok, I'll implement something to that effect. I'm not sure if I canb
get it
Ole Myren Rohne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think which signals belong to "That *kind* of signals" should be
application specific:
I use guile to interactively control a pci-to-vme bridge that gives
SIGBUS in a lot of non-fatal situations: vme-crate is not switched
on, no data available
Eric Hanchrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All instances of `disble', above, should of course be changed to
`disable'.
This has already been fixed in CVS. Anyway: thanks!
Marko Kohtala [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
guile-readline/configure in guile-1.4 checks for rl_pre_input_hook in
libreadline. However, it checks it as a function while it actually is a
function pointer variable. This does not go through all linkers. I
noticed this on HP-UX 10.20.
Can you check
Mikael Djurfeldt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not up-to-date on what you're talking about, but since you mention
removing *one* item, it seems like you should use scm_delq1_x instead
of scm_delq_x.
Yep, right. I though scm_delq_x would only remove one item. Wasn't
that the case some time
Keisuke Nishida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Is this a bug?
% guile
guile (let loop ((foo loop)) foo)
#procedure loop (foo)
R5RS says variable is bound within body.
You did expect it to be bound _only_ in body, not in the
initialization expressions of the bindings, right?
for the report! The header files sys/types.h and
sys/time.h are taken care of in the file "iselect.h" already.
unistd.h should be included, tho.
2000-08-05 Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* iselect.c: Include unistd.h. Thanks to Bertrand Petit!
Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Keisuke Nishida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
Is this a bug?
% guile
guile (let loop ((foo loop)) foo)
#procedure loop (foo)
R5RS says variable is bound within body.
[rubish]
Sorry, I did not look close enough what
[ Please post bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. ]
Ivan Toshkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is the test module, with missing closing paren:
---
(define-module (test))
(define (some-buggy-proc a)
a
---
$ guile
guile (version)
"1.4"
guile (use-modules
Bill Schottstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think the line (209 in optargs.scm)
((allow-other-keys) #:allow-other-keys-value)
should be
((allow-other-keys) #:allow-other-keys)
Thanks! I fixed this.
Also, as I'm sure you guys know already (I'm not on this
mailing list),
"Dale P. Smith" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not a big thing, but if guile-core was cleaned up, other modules
should be cleaned up too.
Yep, right. I'll look into this.
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dirk Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I understand R5RS correctly, then eq?, eqv? and equal? should
accept exactly two parameters. The current CVS guile, however,
accepts more parameters as well. On the one hand, this seems to be
a sensible extension, but it should somehow be possible
Matthias Koeppe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2000-10-28 Matthias Koeppe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Makefile.am: Install guile-procedures.txt in version-specific
directory to enable multiple installed guile versions.
Suggested by Karl M. Hegbloom [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Applied!
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is with a current CVS Guile (on a GNU/Linux system).
[neil@ossau neil]$ guile
guile (display-error #f #f #f #f #f #f)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
[neil@ossau neil]$
The problem arises because scm_display_error does not check that its
I think we already have discovered this, right? But it looks like we
didn't fix it. What's the procedure for getting the Web pages
changed?
Subject: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Guile webpages unreadable]
bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--text follows this line--
Please DTRT.
Martin Grabmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
this is not really a bug, but I think the attached change should be
made for the sake of consistency.
2001-02-08 Martin Grabmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* macros.c (scm_macro_name, scm_macro_transformer): Use
Alexander Klimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi.
According to `man test' on Solaris 2.6 there is no `-e' primitive for sh,
but only for ksh. It also exists in bash.
There is an error in check-guile:36
if [ ! -e guile-procedures.txt ]; then
^^^
which produces the error message
Alexander Klimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actully, documentation said that all commands follow simbolic links, so
`-f' means that after it resolve symbolic links it found `regular file'.
Ahh, I see. Sorry for not checking more thoroughly. "-f" is the way
to go, then.
Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mar 30, 2001, Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The configure script contains a test command using the `==' operator.
`==' is not portable. Please change that to `='. Thanks,
Please
Martin Grabmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I assume it is just a small mistake that values.h is not included in
libguile.h, but I ask anyway because maybe the `multiple values C API'
was only experimental. If it is okay, I will add it.
It's OK! Thanks!
Masao Uebayashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These have to have '0755' so that autogen.sh can run properly.
Is that a real problem in practice? I think when you chmod them once,
CVS will keep the permissions across updates. On the other hand, I'm
not sure that CVS will keep the permissions
Bill Schottstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think this macro is missing from the CVS
guile-core/libguile/deprecation.h.
No, it is supposed to be defined in libguile/scmconfig.h. You
probably didn't pick up the change yet in your build setup. Try
rerunning autogen.sh, configure, etc.
Dale P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
#2 0x2ad30308 in __libc_realloc (oldmem=0x2adde954, bytes=18000)
at malloc.c:3097
#3 0x2aafb028 in scm_must_realloc (where=0x100260b8, old_size=12000,
size=18000, what=0x2aac93f0 scm_subr_table) at gc.c:1931
This looks suspicious. Compare
Bill Schottstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure that my copy of CVS guile-core/configure.in is actually
up-to-date, but I think it needs something like:
EXTRA_DOT_X_FILES=`echo ${LIBOBJS} | sed 's/\.o/.x/g'`
after the similar line for EXTRA_DOT_DOC_FILES, and the
corresponding
Tom Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just a note to say I've ported guile-1.3 to mips-compaq-nonstopux.
I had to make some changes though.
Great! To get your changes into mainstream Guile, you would have to
port the current CVS version and send us patches. If the patches are
significant, we
Martin Grabmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello list,
I suppose this is related to the recent module system changes:
mgrabmue@tortoise (~/cvs/guile/guile-core/libguile):
GUILE_LOAD_PATH=/home/mgrabmue/cvs/guile/guile-core ./guile
guile (use-modules (definitely not installed module))
Ariel Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/local/bin/guile
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xff794f0 in scm_hash_fn_create_handle_x () at ../libguile/hashtab.x:21
21scm_make_gsubr (s_scm_hash_fold , 3 , 0 , 0 , (SCM (*)()
)
Dale P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
gentemp is being deprecated, but is still used all over the
place. Well, it's used in expect.scm, match.scm, psyntax.pp and
psyntax.ss. These should probably all be changed to use gensym
instead.
Yes, thanks!
Oops. The shame. It's fixed.
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
Dale P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
guile (use-syntax (ice-9 syncase))
unnamed port: While evaluating arguments to fluid-set! in expression
(fluid-set! scm:eval-transformer (module-transformer #)):
unnamed port: Unbound variable: scm:eval-transformer
ABORT: (unbound-variable)
Thanks!
Golubev I. N. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To allow guile work with native awk it needs at least one patch.
We already have a fix for SCO nawk in CVS. Does it help?
2000-10-02 Michael Livshin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* guile-func-name-check.in: now should not confuse SCO nawk
Golubev I. N. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But why do not I see this change neither in snapshot in
ftp://ftp.red-bean.com/pub/guile/snapshots/guile-core-20010514.tar.gz
nor in `:pserver:anoncvs@source{ware.cygnus,s.redhat}.com:/cvs/guile'
(which snapshot seems to be derived from)?
These are
Golubev I. N. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since `mkstemp' implementation should be highly portable (require
nothing beyond posix), it may be reasonable to take one from gnu libc
and do AC_REPLACE_FUNC.
I did that. Please test. Thanks!
___
Alexander Klimov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If that helps, we will use that fix.
Yes, the following patch solves the problem
Thanks! Applied.
2001-06-05 Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* hash.c (scm_hasher): Use SCM_UNPACK in the case labels so that
non-pointers
Masao Uebayashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can avoid core dump by the following patch.
This is not the best way, though.
The reason Guile dumps core is that it wants to output a deprecation
warning at a time when the deprecation mechanism has not been
initialized yet. It tried to output
Martin Grabmueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
after the latest type renaming, Guile does not build anymore for me:
Fixed!
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
Dale P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
configure: configuring in guile-readline
configure: running /bin/sh './configure' --disable-deprecated
--with-gnu-ld --disable-static --enable-ltdl-convenience
--cache-file=/dev/null --srcdir=.
./configure: line 893: syntax error near unexpected
Dale P. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The deprecated functions are calling themselves instead of the new
funcions.
Boy! I'm s sloppy. :-(
Thanks!
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
Masao Uebayashi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Without this, any file can't be compiled because of lack of the
definition of uintptr_t. uintptr_t is defined in inttypes.h on my
NetBSD box, but I'm not sure if the proper entry point is it or not.
configure should check for the availability of
Dirk Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
.I have re-implemented the string-number functionality to
(hopefully) closely match the syntax as it is specified by R5RS.
The new implementation tries to be as accurate as possible, i. e. a
rational number a/b is first read as two exact integers, and
[Finally picking up an olde thread]
Chris Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 02:43:15PM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
Hmm, I don't think this is completely right. I think you can't
perform `extensive' operations like scm_must_malloc when interrupts
are disabled
Chris Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm using the stable CVS branch of Guile. This program eventually
segfaults, because open-output-file and close-port (and open-file, etc)
are not reentrant:
(use-modules (ice-9 threads))
(define (child port)
(display Hello port)
(newline
Sorry, for the delay. Is this still an issue?
Eric Hanchrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Building Guile 1.4 on Cygwin fails:
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -o guile .libs/guileS.o guile.o
.libs/libguile.a -Wl,--export-dynamic
.libs/libguile.a(net_db.o): In function
Chris Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What did you do exactly? How did you configure your guile?
Originally, I configured with --with-threads --enable-maintainer-mode.
Then, while trying to figure out why it was segfaulting, I noticed that
Guile was using pthreads, which I was trying to
Michael Carmack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Can the unistd.h bit be altered in the configure.in script on your end,
so I don't have to remember to make the change myself in the future.
This has been done already in CVS. Does the change not work for you?
Thien-Thi Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the fact that i can't cite the reasoning by pointing to some design docs
can probably be considered a bug. :-/
We have Naming conventions in HACKING, although it does not list
reasons...
___
Bug-guile
Ken Raeburn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Building the srfi subtree doesn't work because the .la files are
created in the build tree, not the source tree.
Fixed, thanks!
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Carmack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This affects 1.5.4, but not 1.4 or 1.3.2a. Apparently in some sort of
recursive configure, the original configure attempts to pass environment
variables, but during 'libltdl' this seems to cause a problem.
This is probably caused by libltdl using
Thien-Thi Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the code following produces this output (w/ guile -s bug.scm)
on guile-1.5.4:
(#procedure good x ())
(#procedure good x (1))
(#procedure good x ((1 2 3)))
(#procedure blah x JAY KAY (#:j JAY #:k KAY))
(#procedure blah x JAY KAY (#:j
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What should we do here? Is there a reason at all for keeping the
-left and -right procedures?
I can't see any. Away with them! (I'll do that.)
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AJ Kertis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I'm having problems compiling guile.
What version of Guile are you using?
I'm running an compaq alpha and i'm using the f77 compiler.
There might be issues with a 64bit architecture such as the Alpha that
have only recently been fixed, so please
Chris Cramer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:51:23PM -0500, Eric Gillespie, Jr. wrote:
guile (string-index /path/to/blah #\/ 1)
ERROR: In expression (string-index /path/to/blah #\/ ...):
ERROR: Wrong number of arguments to #procedure string-index (str a-char)
ABORT:
Golubev I. N. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You could also do it like this
To be frank, in my original patch I just stole (known to be robust)
code from `install-*DATA' target generated by automake. And if what
you describe passes all tests, why not contact automake maintainers to
use it
return type is 'int'.
Thanks!
2001-10-14 Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* configure.in: Do not use an absolute path for unistd.h when
checking for return type of usleep. Thanks to Michael Carmack.
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL
Michael Carmack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The specific problem you are having seems to be that the
libltdl/configure script is produced by a different autoconf version
than Guile's configure script.
Hmm. Do you know of a way to resolve this? Should I just try to avoid
setting
Ola Rinta-Koski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
guile 1.5.4 can't be configured with
env CPPFLAGS=-I/cyber/include CFLAGS=-I/cyber/include -L/cyber/lib
CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS LIBS=-L/cyber/lib ./configure --prefix=/cyber
Oops. The reason is that configure is generated by autoconf 2.52, but
Dorai Sitaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ice-9/syncase.scm provides a procedure datum-syntax-object that
insists that its first argument be a syntax-object that is an
identifier.
This is an unnecessary restriction, and removing this check makes
writing low-level macros easier, because you
Dorai Sitaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll just trust you on this. Could you provide a ChangeLog entry that
describes the change?
Hi Marius. Here's my stab at it:
ice-9/psyntax.ss: Removed assertion in
datum-syntax-object that checked if the first
argument, a
Thien-Thi Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
thanks for the bug report. i have started to look at this.
If we can fix the bug that is great, but if it's too hairy, we can
just remove local-eval. Local-eval is weird critter...
___
Bug-guile mailing
Aubrey Jaffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[jaffer@aubrey munspectra]$ guile --version
Guile 1.4
...
[jaffer@aubrey munspectra]$ guile
guile (expt 2 -1)
ERROR: In procedure integer-expt:
ERROR: Argument out of range: -1
ABORT: (out-of-range)
is fixed by this patch:
Thanks! We already
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This bug has been fixed in unstable CVS, by removing the lines at the
end of (ice-9 debug) that unconditionally enable debugging. Is there
any reason why we shouldn't fix it in the same way on the stable
branch?
This change would be too far reaching
Lynn Winebarger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Saturday's cvs of guile-core:
Using automake 1.5, autoconf 2.52,libtool 1.4.2
minor
doc/tutorial was missing mdate-sh after configuring (chugged along after
copying it from doc/ref).
This file should be installed by autogen.sh. I have automake
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matt == Matt Wette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Matt Guile 1.5.4 (1.4 also) says that symbols are arrays.
guile (version)
Matt 1.5.4
guile (array? 'abc)
Matt #t
scm_array_p takes an optional arg. If the optional arg isn't
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marius == Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marius Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This bug has been fixed in unstable CVS, by removing the lines at the
end of (ice-9 debug) that unconditionally enable debugging
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, wouldn't a better fix be to include a prebuilt
guile-procedures.txt in the distribution? If I understand correctly,
all we would need to do is
- add guile-procedures.txt to EXTRA_DIST
- remove the `else' branch of the `if HAVE_MAKEINFO'
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marius == Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Marius Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not convinced. How can people be expecting debugging to be turned
on after having explicitly said `(debug-disable 'debug
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This reminds me of something else. I believe we were going to write
some instructions to distributors on how to build a generic Guile for
including in a distribution. Has that been done yet?
Not that I know of. It's a release critical bug. :-)
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know. It's not huge, but it is rather longer than the `about
10 lines' guideline that I've heard mentioned before.
Marius, can you advise?
Hmm, well, I'm no expert on this but here are some thoughts (with a
conclusion., even :).
The FSF
Hi,
I'm having problems with the new way of handling the TODO file, in
both branches. It has moved from guile-core/TODO to
workbook/tasks/TODO.
When invoking make dist, the file does not exist and there is no rul
to create it. Rather, the dist-hook target copies it from the
workbook.
Sigh, I've seen this coming...
guile-snarf writes its $cleanfile into the $srcdir, which is not a
supported thing to do during a VPATH build.
(This was uncovered by a simple make distcheck, which thankfully
write-protects the source directory. I hope everybody uses make
distcheck freely before
Thien-Thi Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
what is a VPATH build, specifically?
A VPATH build is when you compile in a directory other than the source
directory. This is useful when you want to compile a package for
different configurations but from a common source. The name stems
from the
Thien-Thi Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A VPATH build is when you compile in a directory other than the source
directory. This is useful when you want to compile a package for
different configurations but from a common source. The name stems
from the fact that it is
Lynn Winebarger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wednesday 20 March 2002 16:51, Marius Vollmer wrote:
Sorry, I tested with the wrong file. But automake will also install
doc/tutorial/mdate-sh for me:
$ rm doc/tutorial/mdate-sh
$ rm doc/ref/mdate-sh
$ ./autogen.sh
Neil W. Van Dyke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Currently (latest Guile 1.5.4 from CVS), keyword arguments to the Goops
make method that are not handled do not generate errors.
Unless I misunderstand the way that Goops is to be used, I think that
the default behavior should be to consider
Neil W. Van Dyke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi. When using Goops from the latest 1.5.6 CVS, specifying a primitive
thunk for the #:init-thunk slot property of a class causes a
segmentation violation.
Thanks! I have recorded this as bug 'init-thunk-needs-closures'.
[...]
I don't know
Lynn Winebarger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Or I should say empty applications.
Thanks! Recorded as bug 'syncase-quotes-excessively'.
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
Richard Y. Kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As far as I can tell from reading guile documentation for version
1.5.4., scm_make_gsubr is deprecated. scm_c_define_gsubr seems to be
the new name. However, the guile manual still refers to the old name.
Here is a patch that updates the document to
Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I copied various followups to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but no firm
conclusion was reached on any (except 6). Can you see them there?
If not, I could send them to you privately.
I see them, thanks! I get back to this case by case.
Nelson H. F. Beebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sun Solaris 2.7 and 2.8:
[...]
FAIL: syncase.test: (ice-9 syncase) loads
Sun Solaris 2.8:
[...]
/usr/local/sparc-sun-solaris2.7/bin/ld: cannot open
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
This bug exists in Guile 1.4.
Thanks, I have recorded this as bug 'eager-funpos-checking'.
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Jarc) writes:
I'm building guile 1.5.6, and I get this error from make check:
Thanks for the report. This has been fixed already in our sources.
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Jarc) writes:
I have guile 1.4.1 installed in an unusual place, so PREFIX/lib
isn't in the usual search path for shared libraries. It seems guile
should always search PREFIX/lib, preferably before the systemwide
directories and after those listed in $LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
Thien-Thi Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Will MacOS X be officially supported in the future?
personally, i don't see the value of official support at this time in
theory or in practice (guile maintainership is pretty losing, IMHO). by
the same token (also personally), i'd like to see
Dirk Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I assume that the problem is also relevant for the newer branches.
There, we could think of providing a public improper-list-copy in list.c
instead of providing it privately within optargs.scm. Do we want that?
Yes, that looks like the better option
Marius Vollmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SRFI-1 list-copy can copy dotted lists. Maybe we can just use it.
But ours can't since it is the core list-copy! Bugger!
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug
Steven G. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guile/guile-1.5.6.tar.gz
We don't currently have access to alpha.gnu.org so we can't rebuild it
after it after it has been cracked.
ftp://krusty.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de/pub/guile/snapshots/
Oops, I could've sworn that I
Eric Hanchrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Node `Further Reading' says that Teach Yourself Scheme in Fixnum
Days is at
http://www.cs.rice.edu/~dorai/t-y-scheme/t-y-scheme.html,
but in fact it appears to be at
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/dorai/t-y-scheme/t-y-scheme.html
Greg Troxel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There are two apparently spurious CVS directories in the 1.6.0 tarball.
Thanks, I have added code that removes them during make dist.
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
___
P Pareit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the info file for guile at node The Basic Guile Package the
version info is still written for version 1.5.7. At the same page
the sequence of command to install guile is:
Thanks, I fixed this.
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A
P Pareit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the info node Creating a Procedure there is a typo:
Fixed, thanks!
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
___
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rolf-Alois Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I tried to build Guile 1.6 on AIX 4.3 there occurred
a 'stack overflow':
That seems strange. Can you try to add
(debug-set! stack 0)
to the file guile-1.6.0/scripts/snarf-check-and-output-texi, after the
'define-module' statement? That
P Pareit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the info file at node Symbol Props:
- Scheme Procedure: set-symbol-property sym prop val
should be:
- Scheme Procedure: set-symbol-property! sym prop val
Fixed. Thanks!
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
Dirk Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd say introduce scm_defined_p for consistency, but keep the old version
as deprecated for some time. We don't have to get rid of it soon. This
could for example be scheduled for guile 2.0. Then, you have both
consistency and backwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (I.Sheldon) writes:
With a simple test of starting guile and then typing `(quit)', this
reduced the number of warnings I was getting from 19270 to 19014.
Since this reduction is so small, I'm inclined not to apply your
patch. What do others say?
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B
Michael Vanier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have put the file into /usr/lib and it still couldn't find it!
This is (another) bug in libltdl. It first tries the .la extenstion
and then should continue with the .so extension. However, it
incorrectly stops when no .la file could be found.
A
Michael Vanier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm pretty happy to see guile catching up with other scripting languages.
I'm especially happy with how easy it is to write extensions; I don't know
of any other scripting language that has such a trivially simple extension
mechanism.
I'm very happy
Christof Boeckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Solaris 8 I had the following error while executing 'make' (configure
was successful):
It looks like Sun's make does not understand the $ construct, which
I find really strange as the man page of make mentions it
(mysteriously). It might be that
Joost Helberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If not, can you fix it? :-)
Not necessary.
Ok, thanks!
Is there a way to extend srfi-19, or to make up a new one?
I hope so. I'm not really familiar with the SRFI process, but it
looks like you need to start a new SRFI to bugfix an existing
Orm Finnendahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
after compiling and installing guile 1.6.0 I get the following error
on a Debian with 2.4.19 kernel when trying to use libreadline as
specified in guile's info manual:
Please try configuring Guile with the option --enable-ltdl-install.
That will
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
