2008/9/25 Bill Schottstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
oh -- it's the (f) that triggers the silly error, not the preceding stuff.
Yes. This particular error isn't picked up until the code is actually executed.
Neil
2008/5/29 Peter O'Gorman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We built guile-1.8.5 on multiple machines with the native compilers and
these patches:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2008-05/msg00020.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2008-05/msg00017.html
(attached patch)
For
Sorry to take a while to continue this investigation.
2008/9/23 tantalum [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
i managed to get a core dump file. heres a backtrace and some frame x
calling:
http://pastebin.com/m3c55053b
This:
(gdb) frame 0
#0 scm_mark_locations (x=0x7fff7f4c8d68, n=18446744073709551561) at
2008/10/14 Kannan Vijayan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #24554 (project guile):
Hrm, this may be a non-issue after-all. Digging through the source, I
discovered the SCM_USE_PTHREAD_THREADS macro referred to in key places
(crucially, the one-time thread initialization code
2008/11/12 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I've had some reports that guile-1.8.5 segfaults while building on ppc with
gcc-4.3 and -O2[1]. It seems to build fine with -O1 instead. Did anyone else
see
this behavior?
Yes, sounds
2008/11/13 Ludovic Courtès [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Linas Vepstas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The patch below fixes a crash during garbage collection, where, during
the mark-stack phase, the top and bottom of the stack are found to be
in backwards order, typically because scm_with_guile() was
2008/11/19 Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/11/17 Linas Vepstas [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been seeing all sorts of deadlocks in guile, and so I wrote a small
debugging utility to try to track down the problems.
Interesting patch!
One query; I may be being a bit dumb, I'm only just
2008/11/19 Neil Jerram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Also I wondered if there are already tools to debug this kind of thing
(without new Guile code), and a quick search finds this [1], which
suggests that helgrind could catch bad lock ordering for us.
[1] http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/valgrind
2008/11/27 David Kyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hoping someone has a bit of time to look at this undefined reference to
`lt__PROGRAM__LTX_preloaded_symbols bug.
David,
This is a known problem, caused by your machine having libltdl
installed from Libtool 2.2 - whereas guile expects libltdl from
2008/12/9 Ben Isajiw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I apologize if this is wrong email list for my question. Please provide
correct list.
This is the correct list.
I try to build guile 1.8.6 as requirement for autogen as requirement for
Anjuta. First error was cannot find libltdl.so.7. I
2008/12/9 Ben Isajiw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, this is feasible as I can root Fedora 10 distribution of course. But
maybe I'm not sure where -dev package for libltdl are served. Can you link
me please?
I don't know Fedora very well, but from a bit of googling it looks
like you should
Hi Bill,
2009/1/15 w bugar wbu...@yahoo.com:
Hi, trying to build guile on a fedora 10 box, getting some errors from make.
Have installed libtool.
Hope that this is the right address.
Thx,
Bill
It looks like you've installed libtool in /usr/local, and that it
isn't being found during the
Hi Roland ...
2009/1/22 Roland Haeder r.hae...@web.de:
Hi,
in the above mentioned line you should better type:
static scm_i_pthread_once_t once = {SCM_I_PTHREAD_ONCE_INIT};
That braces around the initializer are absend which is also my C
compiler is complaining about.
But please see the
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Anyway, I think experience from Debian (Rob Neil) on that matter could
be helpful.
It was being seen on m68k, and apparently that is not a
release-critical architecture for Lenny (the next Debian release), so
I stopped looking at it.
I've appended
Andrew SG Rojek invalid.nore...@gnu.org writes:
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?25515
Summary: [1.8.5] __gnu_inline__ compiler warnings
Project: Guile
Submitted by: asgr
Submitted on: Sun 08 Feb 2009 04:06:48 AM GMT
Update of bug #25515 (project guile):
Status:None = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
Yes, we believe this
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #25519 (project guile):
I'm not sure that's right. Currying is a well known and unambiguous
extension to the R5RS syntax, and I believe that Guile has supported it for
ages. There are lots of mentions in the manual, and we have tests for it in
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #25525 (project guile):
In case it helps until this is fixed properly...
This appears to be specific to the combination of
- the use of name in the definition of test-class
- the use of class as a superclass.
I would guess related to the fact that class already has a
URL:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?25865
Summary: scm_take_locale_symboln doesn't intern the symbol
that it creates
Project: Guile
Submitted by: ossau
Submitted on: Sat 14 Mar 2009 17:37:10 GMT
Category: None
Ludovic Courtès invalid.nore...@gnu.org writes:
I've come up with the following patch, which also refactorizes duplciated
bits. I'll commit it if there's no objection.
The patch looks fine to me. Thanks for fixing this!
Neil
Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org writes:
In the Solaris 10 ( AMD64/x86 ) world this si what happens when we attempt
to build guile-1.8.6 with Sun Studio 12:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
_start
Andrius Burokas (javamustang) javamust...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
I'm having troubles to compile guile from source (guile-1.8.6). I am getting
these errors:
ERROR: In procedure scm_i_lreadparen:
ERROR: #unknown port:1:7: end of file
make[3]: *** [guile-procedures.texi] Error 1
Can you
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org writes:
it seems this is a glibc issue:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245701#c18
so not a guile bug :)
Thanks for discovering this and letting us know!
Neil
Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org writes:
Hi,
Hi Bruno,
I'm trying to win a prize here for most delayed email response :-)
Seriously, thanks for raising this. This issue, and the related (in
my mind) one about having multiple copies of a library installed in
different places, keep cropping up now
tantalum m...@thaseph.de writes:
Hi,
while experimenting with using dynamic-link with guile 1.8.6, I
noticed that some libraries can not be loaded.
same location (/usr/lib), same filename extension (.so).
for example libc.so, libopcodes.so.
the error message always says File not Found,
Bruno Haible br...@clisp.org writes:
Hi Neil,
Neil Jerram wrote in reply to
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile/2008-05/msg00012.html:
This issue, and the related (in
my mind) one about having multiple copies of a library installed in
different places
Having multiple copies
tantalum m...@thaseph.de writes:
I found out that the libraries which do not work contain a different
kind of content:
for example (complete file):
/* GNU ld script
Use the shared library, but some functions are only in
the static library, so try that secondarily. */
Bill Schottstaedt b...@ccrma.stanford.edu writes:
static SCM g_skip_block_comment(SCM ch, SCM port)
[...]
Then call scm_read_hash_extend with | to activate it.
How do you wrap g_skip_block_comment to get a suitable argument for
scm_read_hash_extend () ?
Regards,
Neil
Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes:
Bill Schottstaedt b...@ccrma.stanford.edu writes:
static SCM g_skip_block_comment(SCM ch, SCM port)
[...]
Then call scm_read_hash_extend with | to activate it.
How do you wrap g_skip_block_comment to get a suitable argument
Next MinGW build issue:
Sylvain Beucler b...@beuc.net writes:
$ make
[...]
DLL_EXPORT -DPIC -o .libs/libguile_la-stime.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
stime.c:85: warning: ‘tzname’ redeclared without dllimport attribute:
previous dllimport ignored
I found 2 references to this
Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes:
Rob Browning r...@defaultvalue.org writes:
It builds, but it looks like there's a make check error:
Running threads.test
FAIL: threads.test: lock-mutex: timed locking succeeds if mutex
unlocked within timeout
Running time.test
Bill Schottstaedt b...@ccrma.stanford.edu writes:
I believe this is a GC problem; you're doing exactly what I'm doing,
but in a context where the GC is not called. If I place the
skip comment function in its own file, and compile it
with optimization turned off, everything is happy; if
,
Neil
From 8510e39278161d3cbf8ec4ba87b123fe28763ed4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:40:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove GDB_INTERFACE stuff from guile's main program
The main motivation for this is wanting a successful MinGW build
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
The attached patch adds a new `scm_t_off' type, whose definition does
not depend on the application's `_FILE_OFFSET_BITS' value. Can you
confirm that it allows you to build Guile with 32-bit offsets and Snd
with 64-bit offsets (or vice versa)?
Neil:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hi Neil,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Yes. What do you think of the attached patch?
For the record, I went ahead and committed it:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guile.git/commit/?id=0a94eb002eba6539879f2cddf3e45fb25976af8d
Sorry
. It was an interesting problem, as I
haven't gone very far into Guile's number handling code before.
Neil
From 04f9bc774a49b0ab54a37eb401b76aa824876c75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 01:39:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Read complex numbers where both parts
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org writes:
it seems that the popen test hangs:
Grrr. I thought we'd nailed that...
then it hangs for at least an hour or so. My configure invocation is:
./configure --prefix=/usr --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org writes:
check-guile.log ends with
PASS: popen.test: open-input-pipe: no args
PASS: popen.test: open-input-pipe: port?
PASS: popen.test: open-input-pipe: echo hello
PASS: popen.test: open-input-pipe: stdin==stderr
PASS: popen.test: open-input-pipe:
Judy Hawkins jlhark...@yahoo.com writes:
Unbound variable: let-values*
So, in answer to my own question, it appears that my previous post is
reporting a documentation bug, as using the spelling let*-values works
just dandy:
Thanks for reporting and looking into this. In the latest (1.8.7)
Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes:
Martin Ward mar...@gkc.org.uk writes:
Running a test program on Guile 1.8.7 takes 100 seconds CPU time.
On Guile 1.9.0 (beta) the same program takes 237 seconds CPU time!
I wonder if that's because the code is being auto-compiled? Do you
get
Bill Schottstaedt b...@ccrma.stanford.edu writes:
Is this a bug?
I'd say not. It looks like a useful generalization.
scheme@(guile-user) (call/cc (lambda (a . b) (a 1)))
1
scheme@(guile-user) (call/cc (lambda arg ((car arg) 1)))
1
scheme@(guile-user) (call/cc (lambda (a b) (a 1)))
Scott McPeak smcp...@coverity.com writes:
This this correct?
It certainly is, and we recently made almost exactly this change in the
Git repo - see [1]. It has been in the 1.9.x pre-releases since end
March, and will be in 2.0.
I also just cherry-picked it to the 1.8.x branch, so it'll be in
Scott McPeak smcp...@coverity.com writes:
In the documentation for Guile's 'connect' call:
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs-1.8/guile-ref/Network-Sockets-and-Communication.html
it gives examples:
(connect sock AF_INET INADDR_LOCALHOST 23)
(connect sock (make-socket-address
Update of bug #27575 (project guile):
Status:None = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Scott McPeak smcp...@coverity.com writes:
Hi,
In Guile-1.8.7, the function 'scm_to_sockaddr' mishandles IPv6
addresses. Specifically, it passes the 'address' parameter (which is
a vector) to the 'scm_to_ipv6' function, which expects an integer.
I have a patch, at the end, that fixes the
Update of bug #27574 (project guile):
Status:None = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of bug #27577 (project guile):
Status:None = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
Thanks, I've fixed
I.Gutheil i.guth...@fz-juelich.de writes:
Hello all,
did anyone try to compile the guile codes with another compiler but the gcc?
When I tried to use the icc, I got
gen-scmconfig.c(257): error #279: controlling expression is constant
if (SCM_I_GSC_C_INLINE)
^
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hi,
Hi Ludo,
Thanks for your comments below. I should have posted this change for
review first, so apologies for not doing that.
Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes:
I.Gutheil i.guth...@fz-juelich.de writes:
[...]
debug.c(62): error #188
Andrius Burokas (javamustang) javamust...@gmail.com writes:
2009/3/24 Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net
Andrius Burokas (javamustang) javamust...@gmail.com writes:
Hello,
I'm having troubles to compile guile from source (guile-1.8.6). I am
getting
these errors:
ERROR
Xan Lopez x...@gnome.org writes:
Hi,
Using commit 32b12f40509e4bcb0823e1bb2a57e50af14560b5, I get the
following error when the doc is being generated:
ERROR: In procedure skip_block_comment:
ERROR: /home/xan/git/guile/guile-tools:1:3: unterminated `#! ... !#' comment
If you take a look at
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hi,
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
I think the deal was that it used to be generated, and in the root. But
I changed it to be not generated, and in the meta/. But this error was
coming from Scheme; perhaps there was a issue with load path issue
Luca Saiu posit...@gnu.org writes:
It's really been a pleasure to meet you and Ludovic face to face.
My greetings to Neil, too.
Thanks Luca. It sounds like you all had a really great meeting; I'm
sorry I missed it!
Regards,
Neil
Patrice Fromy patrice.fr...@u-psud.fr writes:
../libguile/numbers.h:362:2: erreur: #error sizeof(char) is not 1.
../libguile/numbers.h:383:2: erreur: #error sizeof(short) is not 1, 2, or 4.
../libguile/numbers.h:400:2: erreur: #error sizeof(int) is not 4 or 8.
../libguile/numbers.h:416:2:
Brian Gough b...@network-theory.co.uk writes:
At Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:23:19 +,
Neil Jerram wrote:
Unfortunately these changes don't completely work for me. I wonder if
that's because I'm using unhelpful versions of tex/texinfo.tex and
makeinfo?
Hi Neil,
I've looked into this now
Brian Gough b...@network-theory.co.uk writes:
In the Hash Tables Example in the manual, hashq needs 2 arguments
instead of 1 (patch below). I've updated the hash table output as
well to match the current version.
Thanks, committing shortly.
Neil
Brian Gough b...@network-theory.co.uk writes:
This patch adds a short introduction to the SLIB section of the manual
with a link to the SLIB homepage.
Thanks, this is nice; will commit shortly.
Neil
Brian Gough b...@network-theory.co.uk writes:
A few of the @xref references to external manuals in the documentation
are using an old 4-argument form that produces an undefined reference
in the printed manual. The following patch makes them consistent with
the 5-argument @xrefs used
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Sat 09 Jan 2010 14:28, Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
+# `GC_dump' is available in GC 6.8 but not declared.
Neil, you also compile with pre-7.x, no? Do we need to support this?
No, I use 7.1. I thought I recalled Ludo saying that we need at
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hi,
Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
There was a warning in about possibly undefined `make-glil-local'
in module/language/glil/decompile-assembly.scm and indeed i can't
find that symbol anywhere...
Yes, we all see these warnings. The idea
Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:54:05 +0100
Is the warning correct?
Of course it is! :-)
I don't understand the question or the answer.
(That is, what does correct mean?)
I'm sorry, I should have been clearer.
With apologies for the lateness of this response...
Jay jay.kr...@cornell.edu writes:
/src/guile-1.8.6/libguile/filesys.c: In function `scm_readdir':
/src/guile-1.8.6/libguile/filesys.c:918: warning: implicit declaration of
functi
on `readdir_r'
[...]
Surely:
#if !defined(_REENTRANT)
Jay jay.kr...@cornell.edu writes:
Here is a very strange but successul fix for the hang. Now guile 1.8.6 builds
all the way through for me.
C:\src\guile-1.8.6\libguile\cygwin\bin\diff -u iselect.h.orig iselect.h
--- iselect.h.orig 2009-06-19 12:14:43.265625000 -0700
+++ iselect.h
56a69318b55f0a231cf1531d2b7035c994df6579 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 21:41:54 +
Subject: [PATCH] Fix windows sockets vs. file descriptors bugs
Patch is from Scott McPeak, modified by me to be as conservative as
possible with respect to existing 1.8.x non-MinGW
Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes:
Most of that patch is yours, so we will need a copyright assignment from
you. Please say if you need help finding and submitting the papers for
that (or if it's a problem).
I'm sorry, on rereading your previous email I see that you already said
let
kamal lamta lamtab...@gmail.com writes:
hello Mr Neil,
sorry it seems you couldn't open the ''.rar'' i send you
you will find joined a .zip file containes the detailes
Thanks.
The important part of this is the following message from the end of the
configure output:
checking for
On 21 May 2010 12:28, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu 20 May 2010 03:36, Noah Lavine noah...@gmail.com writes:
I found the documentation in info - sorry for the confusion. It didn't
occur to me that a regexp would be considered a Simple Data Type.
Interesting observation. Copying
Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com writes:
/bin/sh: line 1: 82299 Broken pipe cat alist.doc
I'm unsure what would cause this, but I'm happy to help track it down if I
can.
I saw a problem which I think was like this, but it did not recur after
doing a make -k distclean and then
Update of bug #28091 (project guile):
Assigned to:None = ossau
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #1:
It is documented now.
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Thu 20 May 2010 03:36, Noah Lavine noah...@gmail.com writes:
I found the documentation in info - sorry for the confusion. It didn't
occur to me that a regexp would be considered a Simple Data Type.
Interesting observation. Copying Neil, who's working on
Graeme Cross graeme.cr...@planetinnovation.com.au writes:
Hi.
There is a dead URL on the Guile resources web page
(http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/resources.html).
The URL is for Lumpy Guile: http://home.thezone.net/~gharvey/guile
You might want to remove it from the list of Guile
Fabian Schuetz i...@fms-edv.de writes:
While experimenting with undefine, I discovered, that
even quite important functions, like write or display
can be undefined. The problem is, that calling them
after they have been undefined, leads to an
endless regression, displaying a Segmentation
fran...@frankie.mx writes:
On the page
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/resources.html#guile_resources there is
a link titled Lumpy Guile that leads to
http://home.thezone.net/~gharvey/guile
This link just sends me to a page of adverts, so I guess it needs removing
or updating.
I believe
Noah Lavine noah...@gmail.com writes:
If you look at the Simple Data Types section of the manual, regular
expressions are very different than the other things in the menu:
numbers, characters, strings, bytevectors, etc. The manual section
they are most similar to is the one on LALR(1)
On 4 December 2010 22:12, Nick Cripps nick.cri...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build guile-1.8.5 but, when running make check, one of
the tests (test-asmobs) fails.
Why 1.8.5 ? Can you try 1.8.7, which is the latest in the 1.8.x series?
Thanks,
Neil
Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com writes:
Hello.
Link to GNU MP in README should be changed to http://gmplib.org/.
Thanks, that was fixed in Git in September 2009, between the 1.9.2 and
1.9.3 releases. Are you looking at an old codebase?
Neil
Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net wrote:
Yuriy Taraday yorik@gmail.com writes:
Hello.
Link to GNU MP in README should be changed to http://gmplib.org/.
Thanks, that was fixed in Git
Mark Harig idirect...@aim.com writes:
Looking at the latest revision pulled from the git repository:
1) The manual page does not document the '-q' command-line option.
2) The manual page includes the text:
There is also a tutorial (info guile-tut) available.
It appears that the
Mark Harig idirect...@aim.com writes:
Here is a list of additional options that are not described
in the guile manual page:
Thank you for pointing these out, and for suggesting suitable text.
However, rather than applying these updates, I wonder if the OPTIONS
section of guile.1 should instead
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
On 16 Jan 2011, at 00:11, Hans Aberg wrote:
... when I try to install guile-1.9.14, I get the error below (Mac
OS X 10.5.8 PPC G4).
ld: duplicate symbol ___gmpz_abs in .libs/libguile_2.0_la-arbiters.o
and .libs/libguile_2.0_la-alist.o
And I get the
Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes:
Hans Aberg haber...@telia.com writes:
On 16 Jan 2011, at 00:11, Hans Aberg wrote:
... when I try to install guile-1.9.14, I get the error below (Mac
OS X 10.5.8 PPC G4).
ld: duplicate symbol ___gmpz_abs in .libs/libguile_2.0_la-arbiters.o
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Sat 15 Jan 2011 22:15, Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net writes:
Mark Harig idirect...@aim.com writes:
Here is a list of additional options that are not described
in the guile manual page:
Thank you for pointing these out, and for suggesting suitable
Toralf Förster toralf.foers...@gmx.de writes:
[in the attachment:]
ERROR: In procedure dynamic-link:
ERROR: file: libtest-asmobs, message: file not found
FAIL: test-asmobs
Please try searching for such problems before posting, especially when
using a release that is not the latest available.
Ralf Wildenhues ralf.wildenh...@gmx.de writes:
Hi Neil,
Hi Ralf,
I pushed some more changes based on your input. Below has just a few
specific notes.
* Neil Jerram wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 01:49:43AM CET:
Will @var always generate appropriate markup for making it clear
On 16 February 2011 00:52, Mark Harig idirect...@aim.com wrote:
take a detour implies that there is an obstacle that is preventing
the author from what would otherwise be the desirable route.
No, not really. For example, the Michelin travel guides have been
using the phrase worth a detour for
Mark Harig idirect...@aim.com writes:
Some of the discussion below was getting too far off-topic [...]
Hi Mark,
Your development of the argument below is interesting, and I think it
could be an interesting discussion to have. In this email, though, I
just wanted to mention a couple of points,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hi!
While we’re at it...
Mark Harig idirect...@aim.com writes:
By simple we mean data types that are not primarily used as
containers to hold other data -- i.e. pairs, lists, vectors and so on.
This should be “to hold other data---i.e., pairs”,
Douglas Mencken dougmenc...@gmail.com writes:
GEN guile-procedures.texi
/bin/bash: line 1: 9172 Broken pipe cat alist.doc
[...]
9173 Segmentation fault | GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=0
../meta/uninstalled-env guile-tools snarf-check-and-output-texi
Hi Douglas,
AFAIK
Bernardo Ezequiel Contreras vonbecm...@gmail.com writes:
one test failed when trying to install guile-2.0.0 on Ubuntu 10.10 maverick
FAIL: popen.test: open-output-pipe: no duplicate
This one is fixed now in git, so will be OK in the next release.
Or, you can merge
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
I have pushed something that causes the stack to be unwound before
exiting. Please let me know if you still see problems.
Unfortunately, yes. Now when snarf-check-and-output-texi is run, I see:
| GENguile-procedures.texi
| guile: uncaught throw to
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
| GENguile-procedures.texi
| guile: uncaught throw to wrong-type-arg: (#f Wrong type (expecting ~A):
~S (exact integer (#t #catch-closure 9916c10 #catch-closure 9916be0))
((#t #catch-closure 9916c10 #catch-closure 9916be0)))
This, it turns out, was
Marco Maggi marco.maggi-i...@poste.it writes:
Someone left ACTION-IF-FALSE empty
This is fine, isn't it?
and also left the test
without checking message in this chunk of configure.ac:
Agree that that is unhelpful.
maybe the problem is that GCC 4.6.0 with -O3 optimises the
program in
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
Fixed in git, for the time being. It's an arms race with the compiler,
and clearly code clarity is losing:
FWIW, I think I looked a while back at the possibility of detecting
stack direction at Guile runtime instead - where it is in principle
trivial - and
t;Atilities")
("A.AA" "Atilities") ("A AAA" "Aouncil tax") ("AA-
AAA" "Aetrol") ("A AAA A" "Aetrol") ("AAA AAA AA"
"Aub") ("AAAAAA AA
Neil Jerram writes:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> This is a documented limitation in Linux's terminal handling when in
>> canonical mode. See the termios(3) man page, which includes this text:
>>
>>Canonical and noncanonical mode
>>
>>
Mark H Weaver writes:
> This is a documented limitation in Linux's terminal handling when in
> canonical mode. See the termios(3) man page, which includes this text:
>
>Canonical and noncanonical mode
>
>The setting of the ICANON canon flag in c_lflag determines
>
201 - 296 of 296 matches
Mail list logo
