Re: more garbled documentation in uniform arrays

2004-01-17 Thread Rouben Rostamian
Kevin Ryde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rouben Rostamian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Essentially all items listed in this section need a good overhaul. Yep. Bit of polish below. The hairy functions like enclose-array are still not super clear. Conventional Arrays ---

Re: more garbled documentation in uniform arrays

2004-01-17 Thread Kevin Ryde
Rouben Rostamian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Essentially all items listed in this section need a good overhaul. Yep. Bit of polish below. The hairy functions like enclose-array are still not super clear. Conventional Arrays --- Conventional arrays are a collection of cells

more garbled documentation in uniform arrays

2004-01-09 Thread Rouben Rostamian
Version: guile--1.6.4 Guile reference manual: both info and TeX formats: In the section titled Conventional Arrays (This is Section 19.6.1 in my printout) Essentially all items listed in this section need a good overhaul. For instance, in the description of array-set! we read:

Re: garbled documentation

2004-01-08 Thread Kevin Ryde
Rouben Rostamian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Scheme Procedure: bit-set*! v kv obj - C Function: scm_bit_set_star_x (v, kv, obj) This description is garbled. The procedure arguments are listed as v kv obj while the description refers to uve, BV, BOOL, etc. Yep. It's not really as clear

garbled documentation

2003-12-31 Thread Rouben Rostamian
I hope that this bug report is addressed to the right place. Please let me know if it is otherwise. Version: guile--1.6.4 Guile reference manual: both info and TeX formats: In the section titled Bit Vectors: In the description of bit-set*! we read: - Scheme Procedure: bit-set*! v kv obj