bug#46782:

2022-11-23 Thread bbb ee
There is a similar issue that is solved: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/59425

bug#59425: guix shell --container fails to mount host filesystem

2022-11-23 Thread bbb ee
Nice! That runs. Thank you. I will upgrade my guix. Le mer. 23 nov. 2022 à 15:03, Ludovic Courtès a écrit : > Hi, > > bbb ee skribis: > > > dev_1@dev_1 /mnt/recoverData$ guix shell --container coreutils -- echo > Elmo > > guix shell: error: mount: mount "/mn

bug#59425: guix can't mount mountpoint path, and the home path.

2022-11-21 Thread bbb ee
The new tests show guix can mount all path except mountpoint path, and the home path. ``` dev_1@dev_1 /mnt/recoverData$ mountpoint . ; guix shell --container coreutils -- echo Elmo . is a mountpoint guix shell: error: mount: mount "/mnt/recoverData" on

bug#59425: only dir which realpath is in /tmp is mountalbe

2022-11-21 Thread bbb ee
If I access a unmountable dir from /tmp using symlink, I still can't monnt it: ``` dev_1@dev_1 /tmp$ ln -s ~ . dev_1@dev_1 /tmp$ cd dev_1 dev_1@dev_1 /tmp/dev_1$ df . Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/nvme0n1p7 209921236 180796556 19661028 91% / dev_1@dev_1

bug#59425: guix shell --container fails to mount host filesystem

2022-11-20 Thread bbb ee
## description guix shell --container can only mount subdir in /tmp, and fail for all other dir: ``` # success mount in all subdir of /tmp dev_1@dev_1 /tmp/test2$ df . Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/nvme0n1p7 209921236 180793652 19663932 91% / dev_1@dev_1

bug#59278: how gcc-toolchain can depends a package who doesn't exists?

2022-11-15 Thread bbb ee
"). Le mar. 15 nov. 2022 à 15:54, zimoun a écrit : > Hi, > > On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 at 00:53, bbb ee wrote: > > > in commit c81457, how gcc-toolchain can depends a package who doesn't > > exists? > > The package exists, it is ’hidden’ – it means not accessible at

bug#59278: how gcc-toolchain can depends a package who doesn't exists?

2022-11-15 Thread bbb ee
e means no hidden guix package. And in Le mar. 15 nov. 2022 à 15:54, zimoun a écrit : > Hi, > > On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 at 00:53, bbb ee wrote: > > > in commit c81457, how gcc-toolchain can depends a package who doesn't > > exists? > > The package exists, it is ’hidden’

bug#59278:

2022-11-15 Thread bbb ee
close #59278

bug#59278: how gcc-toolchain can depends a package who doesn't exists?

2022-11-15 Thread bbb ee
5 novembre 2022 00:53:32 GMT+01:00, bbb ee a > écrit : >> >> in version c81457a5883ea43950eb2ecdcbb58a5b144bcd11 of guix, >> gcc-toolchain depends gcc: >> ``` >> $ DEFAULT_CHANNELS=/tmp/default_channels.scm >> $ echo "%default-channels" > $DEFAUL

bug#59278: how gcc-toolchain can depends a package who doesn't exists?

2022-11-14 Thread bbb ee
in version c81457a5883ea43950eb2ecdcbb58a5b144bcd11 of guix, gcc-toolchain depends gcc: ``` $ DEFAULT_CHANNELS=/tmp/default_channels.scm $ echo "%default-channels" > $DEFAULT_CHANNELS # I force guix to use only %default-channels here $ guix time-machine

bug#56371: Can't remove a package present in profil

2022-07-13 Thread bbb ee
Thanks, it is done :) Le ven. 8 juil. 2022 à 09:13, ( a écrit : > > Control: close #56371 > > To run a control command, send it to cont...@debbugs.gnu.org :) > > -- ( >

bug#56371: Can't remove a package present in profil

2022-07-05 Thread bbb ee
close #56371 Le mar. 5 juil. 2022 à 12:46, bbb ee a écrit : > Thanks for the tip! > > Le lun. 4 juil. 2022 à 07:04, Julien Lepiller a > écrit : > >> It's not a bug, because you don't have icedtea in your profile, but >> icedtea:jdk. Guix is picky with outputs. T

bug#56371: Can't remove a package present in profil

2022-07-05 Thread bbb ee
Control: close #56371 Le mar. 5 juil. 2022 à 12:46, bbb ee a écrit : > close #56371 > > Le mar. 5 juil. 2022 à 12:46, bbb ee a écrit : > >> Thanks for the tip! >> >> Le lun. 4 juil. 2022 à 07:04, Julien Lepiller a >> écrit : >> >>> It'

bug#56371: Can't remove a package present in profil

2022-07-05 Thread bbb ee
Thanks for the tip! Le lun. 4 juil. 2022 à 07:04, Julien Lepiller a écrit : > It's not a bug, because you don't have icedtea in your profile, but > icedtea:jdk. Guix is picky with outputs. Try "guix remove icedtea:jdk" :) > > On July 3, 2022 7:25:46 PM GMT+02:00, b

bug#56371: Can't remove a package present in profil

2022-07-03 Thread bbb ee
Hi, I have icedtea installed in my current profil, but `guix package remove` doesn't find it. ``` $ guix package -p ~/.guix-profile -I | grep icedtea icedtea 3.19.0 jdk /gnu/store/5k7lsz61p8fq37c9x5p9xalryjxk31bs-icedtea-3.19.0-jdk $ guix package -p ~/.guix-profile -r

bug#52836: "guix import pypi" fails with "Failed to extract file from wheel" and "no requires.txt file found"

2021-12-31 Thread bbb ee
orrect. Unless Guix is not as powerful as other python package installers, and cannot work for certain type of PyPi packages. In this case, can this be considered an improvement to be made? Le mer. 29 déc. 2021 à 18:09, zimoun a écrit : > Hi, > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2021 at 22:10

bug#52002: missing $GUIX_PROFILE/share/emacs/site-lisp in EMACSLOADPATH

2021-11-27 Thread bbb ee
21 à 04:25, Maxim Cournoyer a écrit : > Hello, > > bbb ee writes: > > > ## Description of bug > > emacs can't load packages installed by guix because missing > > $GUIX_PROFILE/share/emacs/site-lisp > > in EMACSLOADPATH > > > > $GUIX_PROFILE/share/emacs/

bug#52002: missing $GUIX_PROFILE/share/emacs/site-lisp in EMACSLOADPATH

2021-11-20 Thread bbb ee
## Description of bug emacs can't load packages installed by guix because missing $GUIX_PROFILE/share/emacs/site-lisp in EMACSLOADPATH $GUIX_PROFILE/share/emacs/site-lisp isn't set in my $GUIX_PROFILE/etc/profile and not in my $EMACSLOADPATH ``` $ echo $EMACSLOADPATH