bug#66290: transmission-daemon-service-type not serving web interface

2023-10-01 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
The documentation for transmission-daemon-service-type makes it sound like the web interface should be up and running: Once the service is started, users can interact with the daemon through its Web interface (at ‘http://localhost:9091/’) ... However, the daemon throws 404 when

bug#65541: New fancy progress bars writing new lines instead of updating original

2023-08-25 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
The new pretty progress bars are quite nice. One issue I am ecountering, however, is demonstrated in the snippet below: オブジェクトにインデックスを付けています 71% ▕▉ オブジェクトにインデックスを付けています 74%

bug#64941: ModuleNotFoundError in ibus-anthy

2023-07-29 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Some headway: It looks like anthyprefs sits under a different directory than the engine script: $ guix shell --pure ibus ibus-anthy $ ls $GUIX_ENVIRONMENT/share/ibus-anthy/setup/ __pycache__/ _config.py anthyprefs.py main.py prefs.py setup.ui $ ls

bug#64941: ModuleNotFoundError in ibus-anthy

2023-07-29 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hey guix, Anthy has been giving me grief lately. It's not showing up in ibus-setup's list of input methods. After futzing around with ibus and gsettings for a while, I noticed this: $ guix shell --pure ibus ibus-anthy $ ibus read-cache | xml sel -t -c

bug#53296: Intermittent segfaults when parsing (?) custom package from repo.

2023-02-12 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Nothing like ACKing a year later! This was almost certainly a local hardware issue. The machine this happened on ended up showing progressively more mysterious behaviour that could not be reproduced on other machines. Feel free to close! Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > Any update on this

bug#58215: curl: Enable sftp and scp protocols.

2022-10-01 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Apparently, our curl is compiled without libssl2 support enabled, $ curl scp://... curl: (1) Protocol "scp" not supported or disabled in libcurl This patch fixes that. From 7d90bdbd6377ca29387d0482eefc5f051ff524ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "B. Wilson" Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2022

bug#40641: Building from git breaks when /bin/sh isn't bash

2022-07-18 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > I'll see if these Bashisms can be easily switched to POSIX variants, > else I'll experiment with setting the shebang of the test scripts to > bash. Is there any particular reason to go this route? Writing portable scripts is full of all sorts of pitfalls and ill-meaning

bug#40641: Building from git breaks when /bin/sh isn't bash

2022-07-10 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
CONFIG_SHELL simply acts as a user override; it's not part of autoconf's core logic. That role belongs to the SHELL macro, who's picks the first available of the following: - CONFIG_SHELL environment variable, - SHELL environment variable, or - /bin/sh See autoconf's m4sugar/m4sh.m4 for the gory

bug#40641: Building from git breaks when /bin/sh isn't bash

2022-07-08 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> I think we’re not on the same page. Is AM_SUBST_NOTMAKE([SHELL]) really > problematic? Is seems like there is a legitimate use-case that foreign > distro users with /bin/sh = dash would want “guix shell -D guix -- make” > to just work without workaround? We could use elaexuotee’s >

bug#40641: Building from git breaks when /bin/sh isn't bash

2022-07-04 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote: > Thank you for getting back to the bug. I am in the same situation in > that I use Guix System now. :D > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 09:20:28AM +0900, elaexuo...@wilsonb.com wrote: > > so you could be able to sanity > > check with something like > > > > $

bug#40641: Building from git breaks when /bin/sh isn't bash

2022-06-20 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> Wilson, could you confirm whether there's still something to fix here? > Else, let's close this ticket and move on. The original issue arose on a Void Linux foreign distro installation. I have long since converted to Guix System, so cannot easily test the original environment. However, Void

bug#40558: Modular TexLive "Insufficient extension fonts" and duplicate fonts

2022-01-22 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> At least the question “is texlive-amsfonts broken” is definitively > answered. This was what this issue was about, no? I’d rather keep the > other issue separate. Well, it's still broken in the sense that we're not able to typeset with eufm10, no? That said, I guess it could make sense to

bug#40558: Modular TexLive "Insufficient extension fonts" and duplicate fonts

2022-01-21 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > elaexuo...@wilsonb.com writes: > > > Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >> This is a problem with the modular TeX Live packages. The pk files are > >> bitmap fonts. I found that adding texlive-cm-super to the union helps > >> in that the bitmap variants of the CM fonts will

bug#53404: Bash completions provided by nvme-cli producing syntax error

2022-01-20 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hello Guix, Installing nvme-cli into my user profile causes the following error to show at bash login: bash: 'intel': syntax error: operand expected (error token is "'intel'") Starting bash with xtrace enabled places the error at share/bash-completion/completions/nvme:11: readonly

bug#53339: [version-1.4.0] Package with texlive-updmap.cfg and texlive-amsfonts failing to find Euler

2022-01-20 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > > > elaexuo...@wilsonb.com writes: > > > >> Attached patch on top of version-1.4.0 attempts to typset PDF docs for the > >> metamath package. However, the below error results, which seems to indicate > >> that the Euler fonts are not found,

bug#53339: [version-1.4.0] Package with texlive-updmap.cfg and texlive-amsfonts failing to find Euler

2022-01-17 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hello Guix, Attached patch on top of version-1.4.0 attempts to typset PDF docs for the metamath package. However, the below error results, which seems to indicate that the Euler fonts are not found, despite texlive-amsfonts existing in the texlive-updmap.cfg input.

bug#53296: Intermittent segfaults when parsing (?) custom package from repo.

2022-01-17 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Good day. Thanks for looking into this. Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Here’s how I tried (and failed) to reproduce the segfault: > > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > $ find /tmp/test > /tmp/test > /tmp/test/gnu > /tmp/test/gnu/packages >

bug#53296: Intermittent segfaults when parsing (?) custom package from repo.

2022-01-15 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hey Guix, Recently working on a package, I have been encounting intermittent segfault during a build. The segfault seems to only occur when I have some error in my code that causes a crash, and the segfaults tend to cluster, appearing unexpectedly for a few build attempts, and then disappearing

bug#48462: Corrupt, un-repairable store after power cut during upgrade

2021-05-16 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hey Guix, Recently, during in the middle of a `guix package -m .guix/manifest.scm`, my machine had power failure. After rebotting, I simply reran the above and it completed without error. However, it appears that some of files in the store items are corrupt: $ vim vim: error while

bug#40558: (no subject)

2021-02-03 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > This is a problem with the modular TeX Live packages. The pk files are > bitmap fonts. I found that adding texlive-cm-super to the union helps > in that the bitmap variants of the CM fonts will not be generated any > more. More font packages may be needed in the union

bug#44519: Qemu fails to start Samba server

2020-11-08 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Um. Apparently, I was the one failing. I just tried connecting again, and as long as smbd has setuid, the qemu SMB share works as advertised. Sorry for the false alarm.

bug#44519: Qemu fails to start Samba server

2020-11-08 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Hey Guix, Having trouble getting the Samba directory share in qemu to work as advertised: $ qemu-system-x86_64 -netdev user,id=net0,smb=/share ... Running something like the above with samba installed should spin up `smbd`; however, this doesn't happen. I see no smbd processes started. Qemu

bug#43062: --expose in vm does not reflect file modifications in guest

2020-08-29 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> I believe this comes from the “cache=loose” 9p mount option added in > commit e0d96774dd48c29ccc4c90fea1f8f71850ab0879. > > Does the patch below help? Yes, when no caching behaviour is specified in the guest, the problem disappears. I also tried cache=fscache and see the exact same problem as

bug#43062: --expose in vm does not reflect file modifications in guest

2020-08-26 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
## Overview When using --expose to mirror a path between host and guest, the guest mirror fails to reflect file modifications from the host. However, file creation and deletion are correctly propogated. To pick up file modifications in the guest, it is sufficient to remount mirroring 9p

bug#41822: Bug in compute-guix-derivation?

2020-06-18 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Thank you, Ludo. I am having trouble reproducing the error for some reason now. For a few days guix pull invariable died in this way, but now it's getting past that point and failing in a completely new way on SIGPIPE. I will try to come back with something more useful. Ludovic Courtès wrote:

bug#41822: Bug in compute-guix-derivation?

2020-06-11 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Not exactly sure what to report, but: $ guix pull Building from this channel: guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git 9c6ea3c Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... \guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program

bug#25258: Bashisms in make rules

2020-05-16 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Resurrecting this, since it cause me significant grief, and is a simple workaround which I believe is worth putting in the documentation. First, here is a short summary of the problem: Currently, some of our make rules contain bashisms. As of commit 408ae72c, this ends up generating broken

bug#40641: Building from git breaks when /bin/sh isn't bash

2020-04-17 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 06:06:25PM +0900, elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for > GNU Guix wrote: > > When building from git, ./bootstrap ends up generating (via automake) > > several > > Makefiles that set SHELL = /bin/sh. H

bug#40641: Building from git breaks when /bin/sh isn't bash

2020-04-15 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
When building from git, ./bootstrap ends up generating (via automake) several Makefiles that set SHELL = /bin/sh. However, some targets contain rules that make use of bashisms. This leads to breakage when /bin/sh is something other than bash. In particular, I am building from a foreign distro

bug#40565: make authenticate fails: commit 77704cb13e5bebf412297dab764a00849a3cfdc0: key A0C5E3522EF8EF5C64CDB7F0FD73CAC719D32566 is missing

2020-04-11 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Playing around with the git repo and following along with: https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Building-from-Git.html#Building-from-Git make authenticate is erroring out for me: $ make authenticate ... Throw to `srfi-34' with args `(#)'. It looks like the referenced key

bug#40518: guix pull: Dependency guix-packages-base fails

2020-04-10 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
Thank you for hand holding me through this, and thank you for all the amazing dev work. Cheers. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

bug#40518: guix pull: Dependency guix-packages-base fails

2020-04-09 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> It could be an out-of-memory (OOM) condition: this build phase is > unfortunately very demanding currently (at least 2 GiB or RAM I think). > How much RAM do you have? I think we have a winner. This is running on a VM and I just realized it it only runs with 500MB of ram. So, if I am

bug#40518: guix pull: Dependency guix-packages-base fails

2020-04-09 Thread elaexuotee--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix
From a relatively fresh system install, guix pull fails with the following error: | @ build-started /gnu/store/waisnnl9nbmlbpfwbn50pif79fsdknf9-guix-packages-base.drv - x86_64-linux /var/log/guix/drvs/wa//isnnl9nbmlbpfwbn50pif79fsdknf9-guix-packages-base.drv.bz2 2701 Backtrace: