bug#59278: gcc@7 and higher are not hidden packages

Hi, On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 at 00:53, bbb ee wrote: > in version c81457a5883ea43950eb2ecdcbb58a5b144bcd11 of guix, gcc-toolchain > depends gcc: > ``` > $ DEFAULT_CHANNELS=/tmp/default_channels.scm > $ echo "%default-channels" > $DEFAULT_CHANNELS > # I force guix to use only %default-channels here

bug#62334: Network is unreachable only for recursive pypi import

Hi, On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 at 08:19, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > I can't reproduce it either, so it seems a genuine network error on your > side. As I report in #62765 [1], it seems a regression on our side: which passes with 29efa27. And indeed, using 86d580c, “guix import pypi

bug#52257: Replace pumpa origin

Hi, On Thu, 02 Mar 2023 at 02:11, Sarthak Shah wrote: > I've sent a patch to guix-patc...@gnu.org that should fix this. > This is my first commit to the project, so please let me know if I've > made any mistakes. For reference, the patch is #61906 [1]. 1:

bug#61520: Bug found

Hi, On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 21:27, tmikew1985 via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > building > /gnu/store/q0s8s1mlvngrxahnw146kbc2nf6s3amz-compute-guix-derivation.drv... > graphviz-2.49.0-doc 2.0MiB 12KiB/s 01:35 [## ] 57.-Backtrace: [...] > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the

bug#51505: Request for official docker image on dockerhub

Hi, On Thu, 09 Feb 2023 at 18:20, Eugen Stan wrote: > I also think it would be a great idea to have guix running inside docker. > > I tried to adopt guix as a package maanger in our CI/CD pipeline and I > could not run it inside a debian Docker image. Yeah, it could be helpful. In addition

bug#31642: Missing 'glib-pacrunner.service' causes Epiphany and Eolie to fail on GNOME

Hi, On Tue, 29 May 2018 at 16:27, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > To break the loop, we probably need to introduce > glib-networking-minimal and have network-manager depend on it > (indirectly). We are at Guix Days. What is the status of this bug #31642 [1]? 1:

bug#59579: installing zbar prevents gdm to start on Ubuntu 22.04 foreign distro

Hi, On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 at 14:23, 宋文武 via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > Hello, I don't think XDG_DATA_DIRS should be the problems, but other > environment variables with "lib", since the xdg data should be > portable... I had the issue yesterday on Ubuntu. :-) > I think GUIX_GTK3_PATH,

bug#61075: QA fails on patch#61059

Hi, The submission #61059 [1] leads to the log below. 1: It seems the issue is coming from ’guix-data-service/jobs/load-new-guix-revision.scm’ but I cannot tell more. :-) Cheers, simon --8<---cut here---start->8---

bug#58880: Patch impacting translation (was Re: bug#58880: 'guix gc' does not round the amount of disk space freed)

Hi, On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 at 17:43, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Changing the po files in guix repo will work at first, it'll be > negated next time I push changes from weblate. We could change the po > files to ensure continuity, but we have to also apply the change to > the repo behind weblate. I

bug#58880: Patch impacting translation (was Re: bug#58880: 'guix gc' does not round the amount of disk space freed)

Hi, On Sat, 21 Jan 2023 at 17:52, Remco van 't Veer wrote: >>> * guix/scripts/gc.scm (guix-gc): Round MiBs in user feedback. >>> * po/*/*.po (guix/scripts/gc.scm)a: Round MiBs in user feedback. >> >> If the way to go with the translation dance? > > I don't know. I figured since the translation

bug#58841: repl ignores modules from the channel added to time-machine

Hi Ludo, On Sat, 05 Nov 2022 at 11:31, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Currently you have to start with: > > (use-modules (gnu packages)) > > This will set up ‘%load-path’ so that channel modules become visible. > Let me know if it works for you! > > This is a bug we should fix. Ah, I thought it

bug#33614: reposurgeon build is broken

Hi Maxim, On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 17:16, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> Since no one care enough this package, I am propose to close this issue >> by simply removing the package. WDYT? > > I'm fine with it. I tried updating it, but it is now written in Go and > would require packaging a few new Go

bug#58880: 'guix gc' does not round the amount of disk space freed

Hi, On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 21:33, Remco van 't Veer wrote: > * guix/scripts/gc.scm (guix-gc): Round MiBs in user feedback. > * po/*/*.po (guix/scripts/gc.scm)a: Round MiBs in user feedback. If the way to go with the translation dance? > --- > guix/scripts/gc.scm | 8 > po/guix/bn.po

bug#60545: Keras h5py Version Mismatch

Hi, On Wed, 04 Jan 2023 at 01:37, Zacchaeus Scheffer wrote: > working (pip): keras 2.10.0, h5py 3.7.0 > not working (current guix): keras 2.2.4, h5py 3.6.0 Indeed, it is collateral to ea403bf290f4bf8c7bae314e32dbb90653f92996 --8<---cut here---start->8---

bug#60589: guix build --keep-going (-k) not always honored

Hi Maxim, On Thu, 05 Jan 2023 at 22:56, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > This is not the expected output when using --keep-failed; I would have > expected the build to complete then guix to report about the failure, > but it appears to abort without building weechat. Maybe related with the old #51392,

bug#60375: Unbound symbol `upstream-updater-latest' in tests/gnu-maintenance.scm

Hi, Thanks for your report. On Wed, 28 Dec 2022 at 00:16, Calvin Heim wrote: > I ran the test suite and tests/gnu-maintenance.scm is yielding errors of the > pattern > > actual-error: > + (unbound-variable > + #f > + "Unbound variable: ~S" > + (upstream-updater-latest) > + #f) I think

bug#37513: Subject: Installer finish backtrace, umount dispatch exception /mnt device busy

Hi, On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 14:50, free bird wrote: > 25 Sep 2019 to 12 Nov 2022 is over three years! :D Time is relative, isnt’t it? Maybe an example of time dilation. ;-) >> Any chance you still have the >> hardware around and would be able to test again... > >> That would be super useful

bug#60200: Incompatibilities between gcc-toolchain and R packages

Hi Lars, On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 13:00, Lars-Dominik Braun wrote: > $ guix shell r-brms r make sed gcc-toolchain bash -C --no-cwd --share=/tmp > $ R > > library(brms) > > fit1 <- brm(count ~ zAge + zBase * Trt + (1|patient), data = > epilepsy, family = poisson()) >

bug#60026: Failed to compute derivation bug

Hi, On Sat, 17 Dec 2022 at 22:19, Joseph Turner wrote: > You were right, zimoun! Sorry to waste your time! No worry. :-) Can we close this report? Cheers, simon

bug#60056: [PATCH RFC 1/6] build: Add gnu-build-system v2.

Hi Maxim, On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 at 23:56, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > OK. I've used the etc/teams.scm script output to CC the core team > members. Hopefully it helped to ping them (did it for you?). Maybe something is wrong with my config, but I am not able to find these messages where I am CC.

bug#60026: Failed to compute derivation bug

Hi, On Tue, 13 Dec 2022 at 10:20, Joseph Turner via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > This occurred on a guix installation on a foreign distro, yes. On a > VPS I rent, which I recently upgraded to Debian 11. Guix was installed > using `apt install guix`. What are the resources

bug#59946: gnutls fails on armhf-linux

Hi, On Sat, 10 Dec 2022 at 16:38, Elias Howell via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > System: Asus C201 > > CPU: Quad Core ARMv7 v7l (-MCP-) speed/min/max: 1800/126/1800 MHz Kernel: > 5.15.6-gnu-PrawnOS-libre armv7l Up: 12h 37m > Mem: 888.2/2011.9 MiB (44.1%) Storage: 252.98 GiB (2.1% used)

bug#59926: request: lnav

Hi, On Fri, 09 Dec 2022 at 16:03, Steven Roose wrote: > Package request: lnav (the log navigator) > Website: https://lnav.org/ I am in favor to close. It is not a bug and if we keep all the package requests in the bug tracker, it will become unmanageable. :-) There is nothing special for

bug#44112:

Hi, Thank you for the follow up. On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 12:22, Hendursaga via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > The patch[1] has been closed for some time, is there any other pending > patches blocking going forward? > > [1] https://github.com/slime/slime/issues/583 Indeed, but the package

bug#59072: guix pull bug report

Hi, On Sun, 06 Nov 2022 at 12:30, 范啟能 wrote: > -Backtrace: >18 (primitive-load > "/gnu/store/izm5wcncfddbm2a7a05jj50jn43wrfnp-compute-guix-derivation") > In ice-9/eval.scm: > 155:9 17 (_ _) > 159:9 16 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(# ?) ?) > ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?)

bug#58690: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-ess: Update to 18.10.2-1.01e7f5b.

Hi Ricardo, On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 at 22:55, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > * gnu/packages/statistics.scm (emacs-ess): Update to 18.10.2-1.01e7f5b. > [source]: Update snippet; remove patch. > [arguments]: Use gexp; add phase "patch-test-suite"; run tests conditionally. > [inputs]: Drop package labels. > *

bug#59598: "Unsupported manifest format" error

Hi, On Mon, 28 Nov 2022 at 00:34, b...@bokr.com wrote: > Are all the conditions for a clean sync > of the file system where /gnu/store is mounted guaranteed? More or less, yes. You can read some discussion in patch#58035 [1]. 1:

bug#59598: "Unsupported manifest format" error

Hi, On Fri, 25 Nov 2022 at 22:06, Tyler Wolf via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > I then can see that my ~/.guix-profile/manifest is empty, thus I think > it is safe to say that this is where the issue is originating, however > I am unable to rewrite this file, so I was wondering if there was

bug#58694: `sudo --login guix pull` fails

Hi, On Fri, 21 Oct 2022 at 23:53, Rostislav Svoboda wrote: > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0% >

bug#58746: guix pull fails in power saving profile

Hi, On Sun, 23 Oct 2022 at 16:08, two--- via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > ``` > Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... / > substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'... > 0.0%guix substitute: error: TLS error in procedure >

bug#58900: guix pull failure

Hi, Sorry I have missed your email because you sent only to me and not to the bug report 58...@debbugs.gnu.org. On Thu, 3 Nov 2022 at 14:22, wrote: > >> guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git9eabe0e > > | This commit is from Oct 30th, 2022… [...] > >>

bug#59566: Fail ’guix time-machine’ (Nov 2021) because libgit2

. 1: <https://yhetil.org/guix/20221123221009.06020...@koszkonutek-tmp.pl.eu.org> Cheers, simon -- Initially sent to guix-devel: From: zimoun To: Guix Devel Subject: Fail ’guix time-machine’ on Nov 2021 because libgit2

bug#59179: BUG: (./guix/base32.scm:296:65: ERROR)

Hi, On Sat, 12 Nov 2022 at 14:36, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > Fixed by Andrew with: 0760a8511d512ebac388eda0b9e18fd7451ca4b3. Sorry > for the breakage! Cool! But why did it happen? A hash mismatch should not lead to a backtrace. Cheers, simon

bug#36924: GDM, GNOME Shell, etc. break when there are stale caches

Hi Maxim, On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 17:39, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Seems your closing didn't work, so I'm retrying here. Oh, thanks. I probably missed to append -done. :-) Cheers, simon

bug#59277: Latest guix documentation - version number scrambled ?

Hi, On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 at 16:56, Sébastien FARGE wrote: >>> A consequence is that all links using the version number are broken. >>> >>> For exemple, on the page : >>> https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/devel/en/html_node/USB-Stick-and-DVD-Installation.html#Copying-to-a-USB-Stick >> >>

bug#59278: how gcc-toolchain can depends a package who doesn't exists?

Hi, On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 at 22:42, bbb ee wrote: > It is just a little confusing for newcomers to guix. If we really want to > improve something, I think that could be to give a more rigorous > specification of the guix command: I agree that the manual does not speak about the concept of

bug#59277: Latest guix documentation - version number scrambled ?

Hi, On lun., 14 nov. 2022 at 11:36, Sébastien FARGE wrote: > On the front page (https://guix.gnu.org/en/manual/devel/fr/) the > version number is replaced by a strange number 'e26b529'. This is the commit against which the documentation had been built. > A consequence is that all links

bug#59278: how gcc-toolchain can depends a package who doesn't exists?

Hi, On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 at 00:53, bbb ee wrote: > in commit c81457, how gcc-toolchain can depends a package who doesn't > exists? The package exists, it is ’hidden’ – it means not accessible at the CLI level. The ’inherit’ copies, so gcc-11 is also hidden, for instance.

bug#59179: BUG: (./guix/base32.scm:296:65: ERROR)

Hi, CC: Mathieu The issue seems from guile-parted, https://gitlab.com/mothacehe/guile-parted/-/commit/8a9913843170dc7e46bbb1c93d7c41241fa6d649 and I miss the current commit 1h9q5plmnc1zd5ikz2x538v4a8lmriai6yyfv53bk5vjls7mrf3r in the commit list of history of Guile-Parted. On Thu, 10 Nov 2022

bug#58789: julia 1.6.7 Pkg.add fails with curl_multisocket error

Hi, Thanks for the report. On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 16:52, John Biechele-Speziale via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > After installing GuixSD The name is “Guix System” (GuixSD is an old name and not use anymore). :-) > julia on the fairly minimal installation, >

bug#48792: CRAN/bioconductor updater downloads tarballs twice

Hi, On mer., 02 juin 2021 at 17:54, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > When upgrading packages with “guix refresh -t bioconductor -u” Guix downloads > tarballs for every package twice. It can be worse with 3 downloads. --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ ./pre-inst-env

bug#59002: Bug from profile path name?

Hi, On Thu, 03 Nov 2022 at 14:56, Greg Hogan wrote: [...] > $ guix install -p ~/profile/llvm@14 llvm@14 [...] > In guix/ui.scm: > 312:5 7 (display-hint _ _) > 1448:24 6 (texi->plain-text _) > In texinfo.scm: > 1132:22 5 (parse _) >980:31 4 (loop # (*fragment*) _ _ _) >

bug#58650: build of /gnu/store/mw6ax0gk33gh082anrdrxp2flrbskxv6-openssl-1.1.1n.drv failed

Hi, On Thu, 03 Nov 2022 at 11:32, Maxime Devos wrote: > Looking at the attached build log, it is a build failure, not some store > error: > > Test Summary Report > --- > ../test/recipes/80-test_ssl_new.t(Wstat: 256 Tests: 29 > Failed: 1) >Failed test: 12 >

bug#40682: Installer hangs while connecting to WiFi network

Hi, On Fri, 07 Oct 2022 at 23:07, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> This bug has been fixed with ea6594e0. However, I left the ticket open >> because I'm supposed to add some testing using the hostapd service Ludo >> proposed. > > Are these still in your plans? Otherwise let's close this old, > high

bug#47949: Failed to produce output path for guix-package-cache

Hi Vagrant, On Wed, 02 Nov 2022 at 11:40, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> I do not know if “git clean -dfx” would help because here the error is >> probably between the repositories src/guix and src/guix-master and Guix >> manages them under 2 unrelated directory checkouts. > > I had the impression

bug#40074: trilinos-serial-xyce source disappeared

Hi, On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 at 17:37, zimoun wrote: > This case should be covered by Disarchive and SWH. Well, is it worth to > keep open this issue when the question about the time-machine coverage > is bigger than just this example. After 2 weeks without an answer, I am clos

bug#58650: build of /gnu/store/mw6ax0gk33gh082anrdrxp2flrbskxv6-openssl-1.1.1n.drv failed

Hi, Thanks for the report. On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 at 21:46, Sjors Provoost wrote: > Sorry if this is a duplicate or has already been fixed in a more recent > commit. > > /builder for `/gnu/store/mw6ax0gk33gh082anrdrxp2flrbskxv6-openssl-1.1.1n.drv' > failed with exit code 1 > build of

bug#31977: clone tests fail on CentOS 7

Hi Paul, On Sat, 08 Oct 2022 at 16:30, zimoun wrote: > On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 at 15:29, Paul Garlick > wrote: > It is about this old bug#31977 [1]. Well, I have lost the status about > this and since I am using Debian with unprivileged_userns_clone, I am > not annoyed enough. ;

bug#58923: Malformed core dumps on Guix System

Hi, On mer., 02 nov. 2022 at 12:25, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: >I'll see if this can be reproduced on > a foreign distribution. Using Guix 00ff6f7. --8<---cut here---start->8--- $ uname -a Linux pfiuh07 5.13.0-40-generic

bug#58861: guix shell emulate-fhs option can have wrong glibc package

Hi, On sam., 29 oct. 2022 at 05:31, John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > ❯ guix shell -CFD hello coreutils > ❯ guix shell -CD hello -F coreutils > --8<---cut

bug#58859: profile contents depends on package order

Hi, On sam., 29 oct. 2022 at 20:47, Attila Lendvai wrote: > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50878 It appears also related to: http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/43585 Cheers, simon

bug#58900: guix pull failure

Hi, Thanks for you report. On dim., 30 oct. 2022 at 14:01, ya...@free.fr wrote: > Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at > 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'... > Building from this channel: > guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git 9eabe0e This commit is from

bug#47949: Failed to produce output path for guix-package-cache

Hi Vagrant, On ven., 28 oct. 2022 at 13:23, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> Oh yeah, that reminds me to add to the confusion, "guix time-machine >> --commit=SOMECOMMIT" worked fine, even where "SOMECOMMIT" didn't >> successfully work with guix pull. >> >> Maybe that's a clue pointing to the crufty

bug#58802: On guix pull: failed to compute the derivation for Guix (ERROR: In procedure %resolve-variable:)

Hi, On lun., 31 oct. 2022 at 23:32, Wiktor Żelazny wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:04:43AM +0200, zimoun wrote: > >> Using Guix 00ff6f7 and running, >> >> --8<---cut here---start->8--- &

bug#58908: Position of '--check' makes or breaks 'guix shell'

Hi, On dim., 30 oct. 2022 at 14:57, Felix Lechner via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > For the Guix file below, which is also available here [1], the > position of the --check makes or breaks the command. > > With > > guix shell --development --check --file=guix.scm > > $ which autopoint

bug#28240: bad backtrace on “guix archive -x”

Hi Ricardo, On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 at 13:30, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > zimoun writes: > >>> guix archive: error: corrupt input while restoring '/tmp/ci' from #>> file 0> >> >> The situation is still the same. Well, is the “guix archive” error the >&g

bug#25752: go incremental builds broken

Hi, On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 at 12:21, Maxime Devos wrote: > A reproducer was given in > : > > guix environment --ad-hoc go -- bash -c 'export t=$(mktemp -d); cd > $t && export GOPATH=$(pwd) GOBIN=$(pwd)/bin && go install cmd/go; cd > && rm -rf $t'

bug#58802: On guix pull: failed to compute the derivation for Guix (ERROR: In procedure %resolve-variable:)

Hi, On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 19:07, Wiktor Żelazny wrote: > --8<---cut here---start->8--- > > Updating channel 'guix-wz' from Git repository at > 'file:///home/w/guix/guix-wz-git'... > Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at >

bug#28240: bad backtrace on “guix archive -x”

Hi, On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 01:08, zimoun wrote: > On Sat, 26 Aug 2017 at 14:23, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > >> wget -q -O - >> https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/guix/nar/gzip/ykpfif2wzabhnn0a88sw3f96paa33k2z-r-minimal-3.4.0 >> | guix archive -x /tmp/hydra >&g

bug#25752: go incremental builds broken

Hi, On Tue, 14 Sep 2021 at 12:43, zimoun wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 16:31, Leo Famulari wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 09:00:14PM +0100, zimoun wrote: >>> I suspect closing this bug had been forgotten. If yes, feel free to >>> close it. Otherwise, I do not

bug#47949: Failed to produce output path for guix-package-cache

Hi Vagrant, On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 at 09:57, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > It is consistently the same errors in the log, though on further looking > i discovered a branch in ~/.cache/guix/checkouts/ that had old removed > files in it (including wicd.scm/wicd.go) ... *maybe* that was somehow >

bug#58778: guix pull error from 1.3, failure about curl

Hi, Thanks for the report. On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 12:30, "Diederich, Stefan" wrote: > Backtrace: > 13 (primitive-load > "/gnu/store/7rn1f6bi17pbir3amrdnhhakq4zbl7r5-compute-guix-derivation") > In ice-9/eval.scm: > 155:9 12 (_ _) > 159:9 11 (_

bug#47949: Failed to produce output path for guix-package-cache

Hi, On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 12:50, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > originally stared for > me with guix successfully pulled to > bb2701b9111a3d82a82ceaaf2b22b51ecd8ac21f, and then trying to guix pull > to anything newer would trigger the issue... > > I managed to workaround it by using an older guix

bug#57878: Minimal reproducible setup

Hi Liliana, On Tue, 25 Oct 2022 at 20:31, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > > Warning (comp): /gnu/store/hjciw32mj05yz1m6r6nzwdi12waz81ni-emacs-next- > 29.0.50-2.4aeb80c/share/emacs/29.0.50/lisp/emacs-lisp/cl- > loaddefs.el.gz: Error: error Uncompression program `sh' not found I have reported

bug#25957: gitolite broken: created repositories keep references to /usr/bin for hooks

Hi Dave, On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 at 17:21, "Thompson, David" wrote: > Pushed as commit 966118da711506b04c11fbfcac9483d59ed2d912. This bug > can finally be closed! \o/ Awesome! Thank you! Cheers, simon

bug#58690: emacs-ess (native-compilation): tramp and local shell used by tests

Hi, The package ESS is not often released and we rely on some pinned commit. The current one is from August 2020 and it does not correctly support native-compilation (see below). Upstream fixed some; for instance let use f45542e723d7415f5e22bcf39f25e31d055d168c. But then the test suite is

bug#40071: Cross-compiled package closure size.

Hi Mathieu, On dim., 15 mars 2020 at 12:31, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: > mathieu@elbruz ~/guix [env]$ guix size > /gnu/store/14ygibryjr7mcly0q9mb8306hlg16nhq-hello-2.10 > store item totalself >

bug#58622: guix pull error when substitutes unreachable

Hi Nicolas, On Wed, 19 Oct 2022 at 10:46, Nicolas Vallet wrote: > I just ran guix pull. I don't know where to start with this bug. Would you > have any clues ? I guess it is because an issue with Berlin being offline for a couple of hours this morning. Hum, the host commit

bug#58247: Using guix time-machine results in unsupported manifest format error

Hi, This issue is about the upgrade of manifest version from 3 to 4. For references, <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/58247> On Mon, 03 Oct 2022 at 00:10, zimoun wrote: > Well, I do not know if a fix is possible. The issue is a > backward compatibility issue. Ludo,

bug#58309: [BUG Report] found a bug?

Hi, On Fri, 07 Oct 2022 at 07:40, Frank Pursel wrote: > Running guix pull succeeded. It isn't clear what changed to allow it to > succeed when it had repeatedly failed over the past 48 hrs but this > ticket should now be closed. I am grateful for the hidden hands and/or > magic that made this

bug#57965: Problem with freecad substitute

Hi, On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 at 08:25, Christopher Baines wrote: >> I want to install freecad, substitute available but the package starts >> building locally. > > This is probably due to you ACL, see >

bug#34427: guile-bootstrap@2.2 segfault?

Hi, On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 at 16:22, Efraim Flashner wrote: > We've moved the bootstrap guile to 3.0 for riscv64 and haven't seen > any problems. I think we can just close this one and we'll revisit it > if someone else decides to use guile-2.2 for a bootstrap guile and > runs into this issue.

bug#40237: Cannot build gcc-toolchain with "make-gcc-toolchain"

Hi Roel, On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 at 21:21, Roel Janssen wrote: >> > When building this custom gcc-toolchain, it fails with: >> >> Is it still the case?  Well, could you provide more information about >> your use case? >> > > Actually, I don't have any more information, and most probably I messed

bug#40237: Cannot build gcc-toolchain with "make-gcc-toolchain"

Hi Roel, It is about this old bug#40237 [1] 1: On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 at 11:29, Roel Janssen wrote: > I am trying to build a package with glibc-2.28. So my native-inputs looks > like > this: > -- > (native-inputs > `(("gcc-toolchain"

bug#39080: How do language packs work?

Hi, This old bug report #39080 [1] is about translation to Pennsylvania Dutch. 1: On Sat, 11 Jan 2020 at 14:54, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Le Fri, 10 Jan 2020 22:58:35 -0600, > Caleb Herbert a écrit : >> On 1/10/20 10:31 PM, Julien Lepiller wrote: > ah

bug#39571: evolution and bogofilter

Hi, Sorry for not being very responsive. It is about this old bug#39571 report [1]. 1: On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 12:10, Christopher Howard wrote: > Hello, I'm trying to get spam filtering working in > evolution. According to evolution docs, evolution is

bug#34427: guile-bootstrap@2.2 segfault?

Hi, It is about this old report #34427x [1]. 1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34427> On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 10:17, zimoun wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 at 09:45, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >>>> The problem has to do specifically with powerpc-linux-gnu (this is with &g

bug#43432: trilinos source vanished

Hi, I think it is a duplicate of #40074 [1]. I am in favour to close both. 1: Cheers, simon

bug#39571: Fwd: Alaska Satellite Internet Re: bug#39571: evolution and bogofilter

Hi, For the record, the message I received back. Therefore, I will close if no objection. Cheers, simon -- Forwarded message - From: Christopher Howard Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 at 18:19 Subject: Alaska Satellite Internet Re: bug#39571: evolution and bogofilter To: Good day

bug#39738: ffmpeg-4.2.2 fails to build on native i686-linux

Hi, It is about the old bug#39738 [1]. 1: On Sat, 07 Aug 2021 at 23:53, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >> Building it on 64 bit hardware (much faster!) works for me, i.e. this >> >> guix build --system=i686-linux ffmpeg >> >> works for me and can be used

bug#39677: Evolution's inbox widget is blank

Hi, It is about this old bug#39677 [1]. Sorry for not noticing it before. 1: On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 15:20, raingloom wrote: > I've been haunted by this for months, so it's high time I make a proper bug > report. > > I wiped all Evolution related

bug#39374: Failing channels and graph on 1.0.1.10297-c5bbcb

Hi, It is an old bug report #39374 [1]. 1: On Wed, 05 Feb 2020 at 14:49, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I wonder if this could be caused by settings in ~/.gitconfig. Could you > try to move it out of the way and run the test? With: > > rm

bug#40074: trilinos-serial-xyce source disappeared

Hi, On Thu, 15 Oct 2020 at 21:38, zimoun wrote: > On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 at 13:48, Marius Bakke wrote: > First patch, replace ’url-fetch’ by ’git-fetch’ with creating a Git repo > from the build farm tarball and falling back to SWH. This does not > change the integrity checksum. A

bug#49206: source hash mismatch on hypre

Hi, On Wed, 03 Nov 2021 at 15:06, phodina wrote: > I've checked the hypre package and it builds with the checksum > 1lvh4ybqkriyqfg2zmic6mrg1981qv1i9vry1fdgsabn81hb71g4. > > It was updated in commit be0997278b5 by Tobias Geerinckx-Rice. So closing. Moreover, hypre is currently at 2.20.0; at

bug#58526: bug report upgrading Guix from 1.0.1 to 1.3

Hi, On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 20:23, Timothée Flutre wrote: > ~$ sudo -i guix package --bootstrap --fallback -r guix -i > /gnu/store/n8vdar2f60mvq62g7mngpqwykbm9rw1q-guix-1.2.0rc2-1.0d4b1af > [sudo] password for tflutre: > /gnu/store/q19l04vd2za80mk1845pz7r8cz29qk43-bash-minimal-4.4.23/bin/bash: >

bug#33614: reposurgeon build is broken

Hi, On Wed, 13 Jul 2022 at 09:22, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > I tried updating reposurgeon to see if I could get that resolved, but > reposurgeon is now a Go module, so we'd need to change the build system > and perhaps add a couple supporting Go modules. > > Would you like to take a look?

bug#58567: Some grafts use a different input derivation than computed by --no-grafts

Hi Marius, On lun., 17 oct. 2022 at 13:36, Marius Bakke wrote: >> 1: > > Not sure if it's the same problem, but it is weird. About mesa, the graft machinery produces two different items with the same content. It is because multi-outputs; as

bug#58567: Some grafts use a different input derivation than computed by --no-grafts

Hi, On dim., 16 oct. 2022 at 19:06, Marius Bakke wrote: > As an example, as of commit 3d8c243efb615c7e642942433be1c7badf0ae65e, > 'guix build -d telegram-desktop' produces: > > /gnu/store/q1gx5xaszlyyr0sx663c2qkx92cqbr4r-telegram-desktop-4.2.2.drv > > If we open that graft derivation, we see

bug#58567: Some grafts use a different input derivation than computed by --no-grafts

Hi Marius, I reminds me this [1]. 1: On dim., 16 oct. 2022 at 19:35, Marius Bakke wrote: > It works for 'python-patiencediff', but fails for 'python-patch-ng', > both of which have no dependencies other than Python; but one uses > url-fetch

bug#58526: bug report upgrading Guix from 1.0.1 to 1.3

Hi, On dim., 16 oct. 2022 at 17:25, Timothée Flutre wrote: > Thank you Simon. I copy-pasted your command but I have no file named > "/gnu/store/n8vdar2f60mvq62g7mngpqwykbm9rw1q-guix-1.2.0rc2-1.0d4b1af". Hum, the error is about curl, no? I mean the message reads, > ./guix/store.scm:1414:15:

bug#58561: Source hash mismatch with aggregator + possible guix bug with hashes.

Hi, I am also confused. On dim., 16 oct. 2022 at 14:42, Brendan Tildesley wrote: > sha256 hash mismatch for > /gnu/store/iv6ixlrvh0swq22fjal0cbfbr9ayaq7m-akregator-22.04.3.tar.xz: >   expected hash: 1yy5c29zxpli4cddknmdvjkgii3j7pvw6lhwqfrqjc8jh83gm8f8 >   actual hash:

bug#58561: Source hash mismatch with aggregator + possible guix bug with hashes.

Hi Tobias, On dim., 16 oct. 2022 at 11:45, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix wrote: > Oh! This is a fun one! Oh, cool! Thanks for explaining. > What Guix could do is refuse to continue when it detects set > higher bits, as they always indicate programmer error. Do you

bug#57878: Minimal reproducible setup

Hi Liliana, On Sat, 15 Oct 2022 at 16:40, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > Done. Since I just copypasta'd the wording, I made you the author. Oh, thanks. (It was the news’ wording. :-)) > As for this bug: I've bumped emacs-next to a version that can inhibit > almost all native-compilation

bug#58526: bug report upgrading Guix from 1.0.1 to 1.3

Hi, On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 20:08, Timothée Flutre wrote: > I have a computer with Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS". Some time ago, I installed Guix > to try it out, which I finally did not for various reasons. But hearing the > talk of K. Hinsen last month convinced me of giving it another try. Cool! > I

bug#57878: Minimal reproducible setup

Hi Liliana, On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 at 20:22, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: >> Maybe it could be worth to have that in the manual too, no?  For >> example, under ’Application setup, Emacs packages’ [1]. >> > Would you prefer a paragraph, a note, or a footnote? As you would prefer. Maybe a note

bug#57878: Minimal reproducible setup

Hi Liliana, On mer., 12 oct. 2022 at 21:42, Liliana Marie Prikler wrote: > In Guix, this is more or less a user choice – we advertised the > transformation by which you can opt-in to AOT compilation in a news > entry. Also, enforcing ahead-of-time compilation does not fix the more > pressing

bug#58149: guix pull error

Hi Bengt, On ven., 07 oct. 2022 at 04:40, b...@bokr.com wrote: > On +2022-10-04 12:11:52 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> Matthieu Haefele skribis: >> > Starting download of >> > /gnu/store/f2j6pi0d18pbz35ypflp61wzhbfcr8dp-linux-libre-4.14.67-gnu.tar.xz >> > From >> >

bug#58415: [web site] Broken link to debbugs user guide in Bug tracking section

Hi, Thank you for your report. On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 15:59, Jonas Freimuth wrote: > during my research of how to submit my previous bug report, I noticed > the link to the `debbugs` user guide, last sentence in section "22.7.2 > Debbugs User Interfaces" is broken. The reason for it seems

bug#57878: Minimal reproducible setup

Hi, On Sat, 01 Oct 2022 at 20:15, "Thompson, David" wrote: > I am leaning towards this being an upstream > issue as it is also affecting Debian users [0]. Unfortunately, they > do not seem to have found a solution. I haven't checked the Emacs bug > tracker/mailing lists

bug#57790: Strange behavior with emacs-build-system

Hi, On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 at 02:59, Fredrik Salomonsson wrote: > If I name the local clone `issue.el` (name of the directory); > `guix build -f guix.scm` will fail. It will just copy the file > `issue.el` and then `ert-runner` fails as there is no test directory. > > But if I name the local clone

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >