On 2022-02-15 13:46, Zacchaeus Scheffer wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> There seems to be some problem installing password-store + pinentry
> entirely via guix home. When I have both installed as such, I get the
> following outputs:
>
> $ pinentry
> OK Pleased to meet you
>
> $ gpg --import ...
>
It's not a bug, because you don't have icedtea in your profile, but
icedtea:jdk. Guix is picky with outputs. Try "guix remove icedtea:jdk" :)
On July 3, 2022 7:25:46 PM GMT+02:00, bbb ee wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have icedtea installed in my current profil, but `guix package remove`
>doesn't find it.
Hi,
I've been looking into managing my Emacs packages with Guix. I found that the
`emacs-guix` package doesn't seem to show up in the `package-activated-list`,
even though its dependencies do, which seems like a bug. Here's an illustration:
```
philip@avalon:/tmp/emacs-bug$ guix describe
Hi Guix!
I'm trying to update synapse because it seems an update somewhere has
broken synapse (I'm thinking python -> 3.9.*?). Specifically, I get the
following traceback:
$ synctl start .config/synapse/homeserver.yaml --no-daemonize
Starting ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Hi,
I have icedtea installed in my current profil, but `guix package remove`
doesn't find it.
```
$ guix package -p ~/.guix-profile -I | grep icedtea
icedtea 3.19.0 jdk
/gnu/store/5k7lsz61p8fq37c9x5p9xalryjxk31bs-icedtea-3.19.0-jdk
$ guix package -p ~/.guix-profile -r
Hi,
Oleg Pykhalov skribis:
> Currently ‘identity-file’ in ‘openssh-host’ record is a ‘maybe-string’,
> but it could be a list, which generates a config like:
>
> Host example.org
> …
> IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa_1
> IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa_2
> IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa_3
I didn’t
Hi Maxime,
Maxime Devos skribis:
> Seems like we are missing a general & documented & simple to use
> 'lower-object-completely' (or maybe 'compile-object'?) procedure for
> this ... And maybe also a ,build-object REPL command?
How about the attached patch?
Sample session:
Pierre Neidhardt skribis:
> Robert Goldman from ASDF found out why the "COMPONENT not found" issue
> happens:
>
> https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/asdf/asdf/-/issues/119#note_9808
>
> So either we fix most of the Prove-depending libraries, or we just do
> what's expected from every one, that is,
Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis:
> b...@bokr.com skribis:
>
>> I wonder what running this at the time builds failed would have shown:
>>
>> #/usr/bin/bash
>> # ~/bin/top-1-sans-hilights -- single snap of top without highlight escapes
>> (no top opt for that??)
>> top -n 1 | \
>> sed -e
b...@bokr.com skribis:
> I wonder what running this at the time builds failed would have shown:
>
> #/usr/bin/bash
> # ~/bin/top-1-sans-hilights -- single snap of top without highlight escapes
> (no top opt for that??)
> top -n 1 | \
> sed -e 's:[\r][^\r]*[\r]\+::g' -e 's:[\x07\r]::g' -e
Hi,
On +2022-07-02 20:26:40 +0100, Christopher Baines wrote:
>
> Guillaume Le Vaillant writes:
>
> > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> > Christopher Baines skribis:
> >
> >> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
> >> writes:
> >>
> >>> On 2 July 2022 09:29:22 UTC, Wensheng Xie
11 matches
Mail list logo
