On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 08:46 +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 07:24:46AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
We warned you several times about making your changes as little
intrusive as possible for easier review. Since you seem to be unable to
understand what that implies,
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:07 +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:51:29AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
- the rewritten code is faster than the old one. In the old code no
delay is needed for the POLL case but is for the rewritten code. i.e.
it's faster. (irrespective of
(I will reply on the other items this evening)
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 06:51:29 +0100, a écrit :
- you cannot commit this code unless I agree to sign the copyright
papers for libc (which I of course will when asked for). This is a
derived work of mine. Otherwise it has to stay as a
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:51:29AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
- the rewritten code is faster than the old one. In the old code no
delay is needed for the POLL case but is for the rewritten code. i.e.
it's faster. (irrespective of moving timeouts to the server side or not)
I highly doubt it
Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:07 +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:51:29AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
[…]
- you cannot commit this code unless I agree to sign the copyright
papers for libc (which I of course will when asked
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:32 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
(I will reply on the other items this evening)
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 06:51:29 +0100, a écrit :
- you cannot commit this code unless I agree to sign the copyright
papers for libc (which I of course will when asked for).
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 10:22:37 +0100, a écrit :
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:32 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
(I will reply on the other items this evening)
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 06:51:29 +0100, a écrit :
- you cannot commit this code unless I agree to sign the
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:29 +, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:07 +0100, Richard Braun wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:51:29AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
[…]
- you cannot commit this code unless I agree to sign the
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 10:45:56 +0100, a écrit :
here, in the rewritten version even the algorithm itself is completely
different.
Which was actually the whole motivation for the rewrite, rather than
basing on the available implementation.
Samuel
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 10:38 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Feb 2013 10:22:37 +0100, a écrit :
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 09:32 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Anyway, until next time no copyright assignment is needed...
If you consider working on libc again (and actually
Hi!
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:48:13 +0100, Svante Signell svante.sign...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 10:38 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
If you consider working on libc again (and actually it's also true for
hurd and gnumach), you should probably still assign copyright already,
so
The project suggestion below was written for Rust programmers, and would be
common knowledge for GNU Hurd developers, due to the subject of GSOC 2013
coming up on the Rust reddit.com forum. If interested in this could you
please go to
12 matches
Mail list logo
