Re: two build system issues

2014-04-06 Thread Justus Winter
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-04-05 23:42:23) Justus Winter, le Sat 05 Apr 2014 20:16:12 +0200, a écrit : buildbot@pluto:/home/pluto/hurd/build/build-deb$ make -C libdiskfs || echo $? 2 Yes, that's most helpful. Not. I've seen that too. It happens when the dep files have a

[PATCH] libports: fix notify_port_t receiver lookups

2014-04-06 Thread Justus Winter
* libports/Makefile (MIGSFLAGS): Include mig-mutate.h. * libports/mig-decls.h: New file. * libports/mig-mutate.h: Likewise. * libports/notify-dead-name.c: Fix receiver lookups. * libports/notify-no-senders.c: Likewise. * libports/notify-msg-accepted.c: Adjust function declaration. *

innocent-looking patch that breaks oot-builds

2014-04-06 Thread Justus Winter
Hi, here is the innocent-looking patch that breaks out of tree builds. Any thoughts how to fix this? Justus

Re: innocent-looking patch that breaks oot-builds

2014-04-06 Thread Ivan Shmakov
Justus Winter 4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de writes: Hi, here is the innocent-looking patch that breaks out of tree builds. Specifically? Could you please provide some excerpts of the build logs, highlighting the failure? Any thoughts how to fix this? For a

Re: two build system issues

2014-04-06 Thread Ivan Shmakov
Justus Winter 4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de writes: The second issue is due to me doing an out-of-tree build. That it currently works is more or less by chance I fear. I just came up with a (legit in my opinion) patch that breaks oot builds. So what happens here is that demuxer.c

Re: two build system issues

2014-04-06 Thread Justus Winter
Quoting Ivan Shmakov (2014-04-06 11:15:06) Justus Winter 4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de writes: The second issue is due to me doing an out-of-tree build. That it currently works is more or less by chance I fear. I just came up with a (legit in my opinion) patch that breaks oot

RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff

2014-04-06 Thread Justus Winter
Hi, I'd like to see more of the debian/patches merged, especially the exec_filename_* series. These patches cover a lot of files, and they often break and I have to amend them manually. More often than not the fix is trivial, but it is still a nuisance. I'd also like to see the dde stuff from

Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff

2014-04-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Justus Winter, le Sun 06 Apr 2014 19:58:45 +0200, a écrit : I'd like to see more of the debian/patches merged, especially the exec_filename_* series. The discussion about it with Roland was unfortunately not finished. I'd also like to see the dde stuff from the incubator repository

Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff

2014-04-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Sun 06 Apr 2014 21:25:42 +0200, a écrit : I'd also like to see the dde stuff from the incubator repository merged upstream. For this one, I'd like to avoid having to let userland processes disable interrupts, since this brings IRQ sharing issues. (and the stack needs

Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff

2014-04-06 Thread Manolis Ragkousis
As I said in the irc it would be really helpfull if the debian patches got merged with the upstream. Right now whenever I get an error, I am searching in them, handpicking the part that solves it. Actually some of the debian patches are necessary to built glibc and libpthread. I will report

Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff

2014-04-06 Thread Justus Winter
Hi, Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-04-06 21:25:42) Justus Winter, le Sun 06 Apr 2014 19:58:45 +0200, a écrit : I'd like to see more of the debian/patches merged, especially the exec_filename_* series. The discussion about it with Roland was unfortunately not finished. Please enlighten me.

Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff

2014-04-06 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 07/04/14 00:26, Justus Winter wrote: Hi, Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-04-06 21:25:42) Justus Winter, le Sun 06 Apr 2014 19:58:45 +0200, a écrit : I'd like to see more of the debian/patches merged, especially the exec_filename_* series. The discussion about it with Roland was

Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff

2014-04-06 Thread Justus Winter
Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2014-04-07 00:38:28) On 07/04/14 00:26, Justus Winter wrote: Hi, Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-04-06 21:25:42) Justus Winter, le Sun 06 Apr 2014 19:58:45 +0200, a écrit : I'd like to see more of the debian/patches merged, especially the exec_filename_*

Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff]

2014-04-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Justus Winter, le Mon 07 Apr 2014 00:26:29 +0200, a écrit : The discussion about it with Roland was unfortunately not finished. Please enlighten me. I wasn't around when this was discussed, Well, I wasn't really into the discussion either actually. Pochu did the work. See his mails called

Re: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff

2014-04-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Justus Winter, le Mon 07 Apr 2014 00:53:40 +0200, a écrit : Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2014-04-07 00:38:28) On 07/04/14 00:26, Justus Winter wrote: Hi, Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-04-06 21:25:42) Justus Winter, le Sun 06 Apr 2014 19:58:45 +0200, a écrit : I'd like to see

Re: Upstreaming patches [Was: RFC: upstreaming debian/patches/exec_filename_* and the dde stuff]

2014-04-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Mon 07 Apr 2014 01:02:56 +0200, a écrit : Put another way, please people just dive into patches, Put yet another way, if something is eating time in your workflow for no apparently good reason, there was probably no good reason except lack of time for doing things better, so