On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 7:53 PM Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le mer. 29 nov. 2023 00:19:41 +0100, a ecrit:
> > I'm hitting the last assertion, not sure exactly where it is coming from
> yet.
>
> Ok, I missed updating libc :) Now fixed. I'm however getting:
>
> task /sbin/getty(631)
Comparing mach_port_name_t that is MACH_PORT_NAME_DEAD against
MACH_PORT_DEAD will always return false.
---
ipc/ipc_space.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ipc/ipc_space.h b/ipc/ipc_space.h
index 9b199de..3f0eaa0 100644
--- a/ipc/ipc_space.h
+++
Samuel Thibault, le mer. 29 nov. 2023 00:19:41 +0100, a ecrit:
> I'm hitting the last assertion, not sure exactly where it is coming from yet.
Ok, I missed updating libc :) Now fixed. I'm however getting:
task /sbin/getty(631) looked up a bogus port 4294967295 for 28000, most
probably a bug.
Hello,
Flavio Cruz, le ven. 24 nov. 2023 16:30:41 -0500, a ecrit:
> +#ifdef USER32
> + assert(size ==
> bytes_to_descsize(sizeof(mach_port_name_t)));
>if ((usaddr + sizeof(mach_port_name_t)*number) > ueaddr)
> return 1;
>
Luca, le mar. 28 nov. 2023 21:57:54 +0100, a ecrit:
> Il 24/11/23 22:30, Flavio Cruz ha scritto:
> > If a port is inlined in a message, the user has to use
> > mach_port_name_inlined_t to define each port. Out of line memory
> > continues to use mach_port_name_t since that memory has to be copied
Il 24/11/23 22:30, Flavio Cruz ha scritto:
If a port is inlined in a message, the user has to use
mach_port_name_inlined_t to define each port. Out of line memory
continues to use mach_port_name_t since that memory has to be copied to
the kernel anyway.
Both copyinmsg and copyoutmsg can be
