Olaf Buddenhagen, le mer. 16 févr. 2022 05:14:31 +0100, a ecrit:
> Putting it more bluntly: so the NetBSD source tree is large... And?
And it's a pain in the ** to work with.
While using dh_quilt_patch is a very common way to work in Debian
packages. Yes, that's Debian-centric, but we're at very
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 01:59:11AM +, Damien Zammit wrote:
> Yes, that is the usual way to manage changes, but the entire NetBSD
> source tree is very large, and we only have about 100 lines of changes
> in total that I am trying to upstream.
[...]
I feel like I've heard this story
Hi Olaf,
On 15/2/22 9:26 am, Olaf Buddenhagen wrote:
>> I could create a github repo that contains everything for rump in one repo,
>> but it would take time and would be easier to do once the netbsd src patches
>> are upstreamed, so we would not need to maintain separate patches.
>
> Admittedly
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 11:28:03PM +, Damien Zammit wrote:
> I could create a github repo that contains everything for rump in one repo,
> but it would take time and would be easier to do once the netbsd src patches
> are upstreamed, so we would not need to maintain separate patches.
Hi Ricardo,
On 11/2/22 11:58 pm, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> I still haven’t been able to upgrade the Hurd packages in Guix because
> it is not clear to me what commits and additional patches we need — and
> I don’t have enough time to figure this out by myself.
Yes I think we need an upstream for
Damien Zammit writes:
> On 11/2/22 3:42 pm, jbra...@dismail.de wrote:
>> Way to go Damien for his 1st Fosdem GNU/Hurd presentation, which he nailed
>> by the way! It was an
>> awesome presentation! If you haven't seen it yet, then you should check it
>> out here:
>>
>>
