Comment #3 on issue 1550 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Cannot place ossia
staves with lyrics correctly
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1550
Thanks for your work, Carl. I think the key word you used is possible.
It looks to me like the main reason your version works
Hello,
-Original Message-
From: Carl Sorensen c_soren...@byu.edu
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 17:33:07 -0700
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net, bug-lilypond bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Spacing problems
On 3/4/11 11:25 AM, Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net wrote:
James Lowe reported too
Comment #4 on issue 1550 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Cannot place ossia
staves with lyrics correctly
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1550
Now checked the latest version from Git and am I a happy bunny. I'll
verify the fix against a released version, but I can confirm
% Hello,
%
% Accidentals on tied notes are printed at the beginning of a new
% system. But I think that in these cases there should be no second
% accidental in that measure.
%
% So I think measure 5, 9, and 13 are wrong in the following example:
\version 2.13.53
\paper{ ragged-right = ##t }
I disagree. The second accidental there serves a clarification purpose.
Otherwise, it would remain unclear if the carried-over accidental is effective
there or not. You most likely can suppress it, or parenthesize it, if that's
what you wish, but generally speaking, it helps in interpreting
On 6 March 2011 16:34, Zoltan Selyem s...@elte.hu wrote:
% Hello,
%
% Accidentals on tied notes are printed at the beginning of a new
% system. But I think that in these cases there should be no second
% accidental in that measure.
%
% So I think measure 5, 9, and 13 are wrong in the
Comment #9 on issue 1488 by n.putt...@gmail.com: [PATCH]harmonics and
slides (issue3590041)
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1488
I think it should be moved. I'd make an exception if the file contained
other code supporting the main function, but it's just a file
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #5 on issue 1550 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Cannot place ossia
staves with lyrics correctly
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1550
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
Comment #10 on issue 1488 by philehol...@googlemail.com: [PATCH]harmonics
and slides (issue3590041)
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1488
Searched git for harmonics and slides and found nothing, except
documentation from Patick. Is that what this patch addresses?
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #2 on issue 1540 by philehol...@googlemail.com: erroneous output
from \displayLilyMusic when chord has only 1 note
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1540
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Comment #2 on issue 1551 by harmathdenes: Lyrics to the end of an ossia
staff cause errors
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1551
As a workaround, you can write a note after the last note with the lyric,
and hide it and the staff lines with the \hideNotes
\stopStaff
Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #3 on issue 1545 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Volta repeat marks
are misplaced in some circumstances
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1545
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
On 11-03-04 05:57 AM, Laura Conrad wrote:
Run the attached lilypond-book bookcrash.lytex in a directory that
does not include a file named missing.ly.
With lilypond-book (GNU LilyPond) 2.13.51, on ubuntu 10.04 LTS, I get
the correct error message:
lilypond-book: error: file not found:
Comment #6 on issue 1516 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: Crash with empty
\markuplines
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1516
Let's revive the review. The comments from a few days ago are easily
addressed, so I uploaded a patched patch at
http://codereview.appspot.com/4253061/
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-new Patch-needs_work
Comment #3 on issue 1518 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: DOC: add explanation of
part combine functions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1518
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-review
Comment #7 on issue 1516 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Crash with empty
\markuplines
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1516
Applied to 2.13.52, ran make cleanly.
___
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-review
Comment #5 on issue 737 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Enhancement: support for
footnotes and/or endnotes.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=737
new patchset (2 of 5) at http://codereview.appspot.com/4254055.
I've applied it
Neil Puttock n.puttock at gmail.com writes:
On 6 March 2011 16:34, Zoltan Selyem sese at elte.hu wrote:
% Hello,
%
% Accidentals on tied notes are printed at the beginning of a new
% system. But I think that in these cases there should be no second
% accidental in that measure.
I
Comment #4 on issue 1518 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: DOC: add explanation of
part combine functions
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1518
Revised patchset on reitveld.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
Colin == Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca writes:
I believe this was also true in 2.12, so it isn't a regression.
Colin Many of lilypond's scripts and modules will produce a python
Colin traceback on an ABEND, Laura. Do you mean that you would
Colin expect lilypond-book to
Hi,
In the example below the last note is too close to the barline, the
problem disappears if there is no time signature change.
{
\repeat unfold 8 { a' a' a' a' } \break
\repeat unfold 5 { \time 5/4 c' c' c' c' c' }
}
Also, below is another, more real-life example with the same problem
21 matches
Mail list logo
