See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically aligned.
In 2.17.14, they aren't.
\relative f'' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
cis-1 a-1 e-14
}
attachment: 2.16.2.pngattachment: 2.17.14.png___
bug-lilypond mailing list
On 22 mars 2013, at 11:32, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically aligned. In
2.17.14, they aren't.
\relative f'' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
cis-1 a-1 e-14
}
2.16.2.png
2.17.14.png
Nick/Mike
On 22 March 2013 11:14, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 22 mars 2013, at 11:32, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically aligned.
In 2.17.14, they aren't.
\relative f'' {
\set
See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically
aligned. In 2.17.14, they aren't.
\relative f'' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
cis-1 a-1 e-14
}
Do you consider this a bug? Actually, I like the new behaviour
better. What does the literature say?
Werner
James writes:
Nick/Mike
On 22 March 2013 11:14, m...@mikesolomon.org m...@mikesolomon.org wrote:
On 22 mars 2013, at 11:32, Nick Payne nick.pa...@internode.on.net wrote:
See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically aligned.
In 2.17.14, they aren't.
\relative f'' {
Werner LEMBERG wrote Friday, March 22, 2013 1:31 PM
See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically
aligned. In 2.17.14, they aren't.
\relative f'' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
cis-1 a-1 e-14
}
Do you consider this a bug? Actually, I like the new
On 23/03/13 00:31, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
See below. In 2.16.2, the fingering indications are vertically
aligned. In 2.17.14, they aren't.
\relative f'' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(left)
cis-1 a-1 e-14
}
Do you consider this a bug? Actually, I like the new behaviour
better.
