On 1 February 2017 at 19.04.40, Trevor Daniels (t.dani...@treda.co.uk) wrote:
Simon Albrecht wrote Wednesday, February 01, 2017 5:49 PM
> On 01.02.2017 18:08, Mike Solomon wrote:
>
>> Yeah, just checked it out, you can remove the spurious if (brain fart).
>> I don’t ha
ething like this most likely
comes about by two different people making patches at different times,
but the whole passage appears to be from
commit a339f8b9865b0f02febd351ba494129d414fb568
Author: Mike Solomon <m...@apollinemike.com>
Date: Wed Mar 16 15:07:34 2011 -0400
Fixes Issue
\version "2.19"
% broken horizontal bracket intersects with bottom of treble clef
\score {
\new Staff \relative c' {
f1\startGroup f \break
f f\stopGroup
}
\layout {
\context {
\Voice
\consists "Horizontal_bracket_engraver"
\remove "Forbid_line_break_engraver"
%{
To see the problem, comment the indicated line in and out.
%}
\version 2.19.15
someMusic = \relative c, {
\clef bass
a4 a a a
\new Staff \with {alignAboveContext=realBass }
\new Voice = tempBassVoice {
\clef bass
a4 a a a |
a a a a
R1
}
On Jul 25, 2014, at 6:19 PM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Attempting to put dynamics above cross-staff notes using the code below leads
to some awful collisions. I've recast my example in three ways, to no avail.
In the first example, besides the collisions, the
Accidentals should not collide with tuplet numbers.
This shows a counter-example.
\version “2.19.0
{
\override TupletBracket.direction = #UP
\times 4/4 { fis''4 fis''! fis''! fis''! }
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
On Dec 31, 2013, at 7:52 AM, Keith OHara k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote:
'lesNereides.ly' collides again. The collision is with a cross-staff slur,
which LilyPond has never so far included in collision-avoidance between
systems. However, we did have 'horizontal-padding' settings so that the
On Dec 18, 2013, at 1:00 AM, Urs Liska lilyli...@googlemail.com wrote:
If I parentesize a dotted note with
{ \parenthesize f'2. }
the right paren collides with the dot.
Urs
Do you want the dot to shift to avoid the collision or the parenthesis to
encompass the dot?
Cheers,
MS
On Nov 26, 2013, at 6:47 AM, ryanmichaelmcclure ryanmichaelmccl...@gmail.com
wrote:
My apologies for my many emails this week--I am off of school for the week
and have time to catch up on my music typesetting.
I have found that whenever I do two-voice polyphony but flip stems around,
it
On Nov 26, 2013, at 8:10 AM, ryanmichaelmcclure ryanmichaelmccl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Here is the exact sample of what I am trying to do, except I am writing out
the repeats. I want the eighth notes to have the stems down and the solo
note stem up.
On Nov 8, 2013, at 11:15 AM, Thomas Klausner t...@giga.or.at wrote:
Hi!
I've tried building lilypond-2.17.28 with libc++, the new standard c++
library for use with llvm (http://libcxx.llvm.org/).
I have a build failure I don't really know how to fix, it is:
I know that there are
On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:01 AM, Steven Weber pant...@hotmail.com wrote:
Laziness. The movement I'm typesetting is 600+ measures long with tons of
time changes, and only 15 measures of that are split. That's why LP allows
this kind of construct in the first place, no? Because we still don't have
\version 2.17.26
\score {
\new Staff {}
\midi {}
}
Ultra-minimalist composers everywhere are completely blocked until someone
fixes this.
Cheers,
MS
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
On Oct 11, 2013, at 8:18 PM, Colin Campbell c...@shaw.ca wrote:
On 13-10-11 06:55 AM, Mike Solomon wrote:
\version 2.17.26
\score {
\new Staff {}
\midi {}
}
Ultra-minimalist composers everywhere are completely blocked until someone
fixes this.
Cheers,
MS
On 12 sept. 2013, at 10:54, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote:
On my machine the relevant 2.16.-code fails too
\version 2.16.2
\score {
\times 2/3 { s8 s8 s8 }
}
[slightly off subject, as it doesn't t have to do with the bug]
I do this sorta thing in many a score.
On 1 août 2013, at 11:15, Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org wrote:
I have brought this up before without success. But as my interest reappeared
I'll try it again with a slightly more specific question.
When LilyPond finally renders its objects 'on paper' how complicated would it
be to allow
was introduced
several versions before them. Bisecting now.
6f13ef4a292625c1a9d528ac88aec98071ba6388 is the first bad commit
commit 6f13ef4a292625c1a9d528ac88aec98071ba6388
Author: Mike Solomon m...@apollinemike.com
Date: Fri Mar 22 07:29:57 2013 +0100
Permits all positive and zero-length
\relative c''' {
a4.^\fermata
}
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
I'm not top posting
\relative {
\tempo foo
f4---( e8-.)
}
Results in a cyclic dependency warning. Remove the tempo
and there is no longer the warning.
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
I'm not top posting
It'd be great to have a command line option that specifies the
number of measures (or eighth notes or whatever) to typeset at
the end of a piece. This way, skipTypesetting can be called from the
command line or set as an option in a header file. It'd speed up
workflow a
I'm not top posting.
\relative c' {
\set fingeringOrientations = #'(right)
a-5 c-38
}
Results in flag-on-number and number-on-number collisions.
Cheers,
MS
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
It's not the most minimal example in the world, but it's tiny and it shows the
problem (check out the comment me out line).
\version 2.14.0
GRanITzMaLSxcacU= {
fis'32\mp gis'
dis'8-. r r16
} {
\time 3/8 comment me out to get correct barring
\cadenzaOn s16 \cadenzaOff \bar |
On Aug 31, 2011, at 8:50 AM, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Critical Regression
New issue 1858 by k-ohara5...@oco.net: unexplained increase in profile reports
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1858
The reported 'cells', in the
On Aug 29, 2011, at 7:07 PM, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Comment #7 on issue 1828 by d...@gnu.org: contextStringTuning creates extra
space after first system
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1828
I pushed the simple version only affecting the current context as
On Aug 24, 2011, at 3:19 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
lilyp...@googlecode.com writes:
Comment #2 on issue 1834 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Website: provide
link to .ly for examples
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1834
Summarising comments on bug-lilypond:
The examples are
On Aug 23, 2011, at 1:26 PM, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Comment #9 on issue 1235 by reinhold...@gmail.com: Accidental overlays stem
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1235
+1 to Janek's comment. Shifting the accidental below/above a barline is fine
(the notehead
On Aug 23, 2011, at 2:38 PM, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Comment #13 on issue 1732 by reinhold...@gmail.com: occasional segfault when
compiling input/regression/midi/key-initial.ly
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1732
Looking through the code, it appears as follows
)
* The slur starts below them.
I didn't find a relevant issue report. Sorry if I didn't look close enough.
Best
Urs
I believe Mike Solomon is doing a lot of work with collisions, and
particularly with slurs, Urs. He has a couple of patches in the review
process which may fix your
On Aug 23, 2011, at 6:02 PM, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Okay, I revise my comment 13. It looks different. With that backtrace (notice
this=0x12 in Grob::internal_set_property!) it rather looks like the
Engraver_group::acknowledge_grobs has a Grob_info entry in the
announce_infos_
On Aug 16, 2011, at 12:06 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Reinhold Kainhofer reinh...@kainhofer.com writes:
On Di., 16. Aug. 2011 07:46:32 CEST, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
lilyp...@googlecode.com writes:
I think it's literally that we have too many regression test files to
fit into the
On May 4, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Bertrand Bordage wrote:
This isn't a regression. I suggest a medium or high prority.
Here is an example :
\version 2.15
{ a'32[ a' a' a'] }
\\
{ c''[ d'' d'' d''] }
Regards,
Bertrand
The issue would need to be fixed in beam-quanting.cc .
On Mar 13, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Le 13 mars 2011 à 19:53, Nicolas Sceaux a écrit :
Hi Mike,
First of all, thank you very much for your precious work on footnotes.
The following example demonstrates a strange behavior wrt footnotes:
%% For each empty \fill-line in
32 matches
Mail list logo
