Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #14 on issue 1013 by v.villenave: lilypond-book regression test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1013
The link hasn't appeared yet on
http://lilypond.org/doc/latest/Documentation/web/development.html, but I
can see it has been
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_27
Comment #13 on issue 1013 by percival.music.ca: lilypond-book regression
test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1013
Reinhold added this back in 2.13.27 with numerous commits, starting
Comment #11 on issue 1013 by reinhold.kainhofer: lilypond-book regression
test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1013
Regarding comment 6 by Graham:
In all other regtest cases (abc2ly or musicxml), lilypond-book does not
have to be
called for each test case. Lilypond-book
Comment #12 on issue 1013 by reinhold.kainhofer: lilypond-book regression
test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1013
I have now uploaded a new patch (can't upload to the existing patch, since
I'm not
the owner):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1556043
Basically, I renamed
Comment #8 on issue 1013 by Carl.D.Sorensen: lilypond-book regression test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1013
It seems to me that in order to move this forward, we need an owner for the
patch. I don't feel qualified to own
this one; it seems (given the history
Updates:
Owner: reinhold.kainhofer
Comment #9 on issue 1013 by reinhold.kainhofer: lilypond-book regression
test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1013
I've been working on making lilypond-book more modular in the last few
weeks.
Actually, I had plannd myself
Comment #10 on issue 1013 by percival.music.ca: lilypond-book regression
test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1013
I was hoping that chhitz would keep on working on the patch, but evidently
that's not
happening. I'm very happy to have Reinhold take it over.
If/when I
Updates:
Labels: Patch
Comment #7 on issue 1013 by percival.music.ca: lilypond-book regression test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1013
Patch from 3 months ago, so definitely in danger of being lost.
___
bug-lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 1013 by john.mandereau: lilypond-book regression test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1013
I don't see the point of creating yet another stepmake template
(make/lilypond-book-*.make) for makefile code that is worthwhile for only
one
directory; I mean
Comment #6 on issue 1013 by percival.music.ca: lilypond-book regression test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1013
I don't see any manual lilypond-book, or the iffy LILYPOND_BOOK_COMMAND
that I added,
in the abc2ly and musicxml regression tests. However, lilypond-book
Comment #1 on issue 1013 by chh...@gmail.com: lilypond-book regression test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1013
An updated and cleaned-up patch is available here:
http://codereview.appspot.com/206093
The Git patches are attached.
Attachments:
0001-Add-a-regression
Comment #2 on issue 1013 by chh...@gmail.com: lilypond-book regression test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1013
This patch contains en extension to also test the LaTeX mode of
lilypond-book.
Attachments:
0003-Extend-lilypond-book-regression-tests-for-TEX.patch
Comment #3 on issue 1013 by percival.music.ca: lilypond-book regression test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1013
Those patches don't work in an out-of-tree build. With this extra patch,
they work.
However, I'm still hesitant to apply; I don't like the
make/lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 1013 by chh...@gmail.com: lilypond-book regression test
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1013
Ah the $(LILYPOND_BOOK_COMMAND) is was I was looking for. I did not like
the explicit path either.
As to the make/lilypond-book-*.make: I copied this from
14 matches
Mail list logo
