Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #4 on issue 1088 by brownian.box: Accidentals for single notes may
collide with augmentation dots
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1088
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: fixed_2_13_25
Comment #3 on issue 1088 by joeneeman: Accidentals for single notes may
collide with augmentation dots
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1088
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Comment #1 on issue 1088 by pnorcks: Accidentals for single notes may
collide with augmentation dots
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1088
The regression was introduced between 2.11.54 and 2.11.55.
The only suspect commit in this range that stands out to me is this one:
Comment #2 on issue 1088 by pnorcks: Accidentals for single notes may
collide with augmentation dots
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1088
Confirmed that the above referenced commit is the cause of this bug.
___
bug-lilypond
Status: Accepted
Owner:
Labels: Type-Collision Priority-Critical Regression
New issue 1088 by pnorcks: Accidentals for single notes may collide with
augmentation dots
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1088
This is a regression from 2.10.33, and is most likely related to
