Re: Issue 1488 in lilypond: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041)

2011-03-07 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #11 on issue 1488 by percival.music.ca: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1488 @Neil: done, thanks. @Phil: the doc patch from Patrick Schmidt contains a small amount of new code (in

Re: Issue 1488 in lilypond: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041)

2011-03-06 Thread lilypond
Comment #9 on issue 1488 by n.putt...@gmail.com: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1488 I think it should be moved. I'd make an exception if the file contained other code supporting the main function, but it's just a file

Re: Issue 1488 in lilypond: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041)

2011-03-06 Thread lilypond
Comment #10 on issue 1488 by philehol...@googlemail.com: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1488 Searched git for harmonics and slides and found nothing, except documentation from Patick. Is that what this patch addresses?

Re: Issue 1488 in lilypond: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041)

2011-03-05 Thread lilypond
Comment #7 on issue 1488 by n.putt...@gmail.com: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1488 Why is \chordGlissando in a separate file? It seems to me it might as well go in music-functions-init.ly. OTOH, if we don't want it

Re: Issue 1488 in lilypond: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041)

2011-03-05 Thread lilypond
Comment #8 on issue 1488 by percival.music.ca: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1488 I expect that the desire was to minimize changes to the existing code? I don't have a good sense of what stuff we stick in

Re: Issue 1488 in lilypond: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041)

2011-03-04 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_53 Comment #6 on issue 1488 by percival.music.ca: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1488 pushed. To verify: do you see a git commit with the harmonics and slides subject

Re: Issue 1488 in lilypond: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041)

2011-02-28 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-review Comment #5 on issue 1488 by percival.music.ca: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1488 (No comment was entered for this change.)

Re: Issue 1488 in lilypond: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041)

2011-02-14 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 1488 by percival.music.ca: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1488 New patch here: http://codereview.appspot.com/4186049/ it still needs work (doesn't compile due to Documentation/snippet/new/ issues)

Re: Issue 1488 in lilypond: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041)

2011-01-23 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Started Comment #3 on issue 1488 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1488 (No comment was entered for this change.) ___ bug-lilypond

Re: Issue 1488 in lilypond: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041)

2011-01-22 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: Priority-Medium Comment #1 on issue 1488 by percival.music.ca: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1488 It looks like there's lots of good work in this patch, but the latest version seems to have some mixed

Issue 1488 in lilypond: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041)

2011-01-21 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: Labels: Type-Enhancement Patch New issue 1488 by nez...@googlemail.com: [PATCH]harmonics and slides (issue3590041) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1488 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-12/msg00234.html