Updates:
Status: Verified
Comment #41 on issue 1776 by brownian.box: Doc: NR - Polymetric Notation
\compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
(No comment was entered for this change.)
___
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-push Fixed
Comment #38 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Pushed as
c358ec6f8ed8f31b5fa1d97da6a2284b3759bdfd
James
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Labels: -Fixed
Comment #39 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-push
Comment #37 on issue 1776 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Counted down to 20110914
Comment #36 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Neil, thanks for that.
new patch uploaded with (hopefully) corrected snippet edit as well.
Am Saturday, 10. September 2011, 21:22:30 schrieb lilyp...@googlecode.com:
Comment #32 on issue 1776 by percival.music.ca: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
2.14.2, and then clear out everything in
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-review
Comment #25 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Hello, new patch uploaded - as I had to redo it completely I felt it
Comment #26 on issue 1776 by n.putt...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
It's easiest to remove both snippets manually. If you run makelsr.py it
won't remove the snippet copied from /new unless
Comment #27 on issue 1776 by carl.d.s...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
CG section 10.9.5 describes the process:
Where snippets in Documentation/snippets are made obsolete, the snippet
should
Comment #28 on issue 1776 by n.putt...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
True, it does recommend that, but nobody remembers to do it when there's a
new release.
Comment #29 on issue 1776 by percival.music.ca: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
oh, I remember all right. That's why I was sending all of those nobody
loves LSR emails over the summer. If nobody is
Comment #30 on issue 1776 by n.putt...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Of course, I'm including myself in the list of people who could've removed
them. :)
Do you want LSR on 2.14 or 2.16?
Comment #32 on issue 1776 by percival.music.ca: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
2.14.2, and then clear out everything in Documentation/snippets/new/ that
can live on 2.14. Feel free to recruit volunteers
Comment #33 on issue 1776 by n.putt...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
OK, I'll get in touch with Seba to organize things. TBH, I'd like to
monitor it more carefully this time since the last
Comment #34 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
New patch loaded with snippet removed and makelsr.py run.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4837050/
Neil can you check this is
Comment #35 on issue 1776 by n.putt...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Neil can you check this is ok?
There's a bit of a mix-up between removal and deprecation.
For the deprecated snippet,
Updates:
Labels: -Priority-High -Patch-push Patch-needs_work
Comment #24 on issue 1776 by percival.music.ca: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
(No comment was entered for this change.)
Comment #22 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Francisco,
Could you look at
http://codereview.appspot.com/4837050
when you have a few moments (just in case you missed the
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-needs_work
Comment #17 on issue 1776 by percival.music.ca: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
still discussion and stuff on this one.
Comment #18 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
yes, most of it I can fix in a new patch but there is one thread I will
cut/paste below as it seems to be about (un)expected
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-review
Comment #19 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
I have removed the original two paragraphs from the patch and added a
Comment #21 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
new Draft uploaded
http://codereview.appspot.com/4837050
___
bug-lilypond
Comment #16 on issue 1776 by lemniska...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
James: Well I was but deliberately so, you see I am pretending to be a
'dumb user'
James: and do things that are 'kind' of
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-review Patch-needs_work
Comment #12 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Thanks for the explanation.
--snip--
I'm afraid not... It looks like
Comment #13 on issue 1776 by reinhold...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Another short explanation is directly in the scheme code as the
documentation for the \compoundMeter function:
Create
Comment #14 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Note: Need to remove the following snippets as this command supersedes them
395 - Mixed Meter - automatic compound time
Updates:
Labels: -Patch-needs_work Patch-review
Comment #15 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
New draft
(http://codereview.appspot.com/4837050)
Updates:
Labels: -Frog Patch-review
Comment #10 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Patch for doc here
http://codereview.appspot.com/4837050
I'd still like the
Comment #11 on issue 1776 by lemniska...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
James,
i hoped to answer sooner but i had to fight problems with grand-fixcc.
2011/7/31 Comment #9 on issue 1776 by
Comment #9 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Hello, thanks for those examples that is perfect.
However, because I am curious (and don't a thing about this special
Comment #7 on issue 1776 by lemniska...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
I suggest this:
\relative c' {
\compoundMeter #'(2 2 2 8)
\repeat unfold 6 c8 \repeat unfold 12 c16
}
\relative c' {
Comment #8 on issue 1776 by lemniska...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Ah, i should learn to read :) Yes, the description from the regtest says
this: #'((3 2 8)) is how LilyPond likes it, but
Updates:
Summary: Doc: NR - Polymetric Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
Comment #5 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Hello, I have a patch nearly ready to
Comment #6 on issue 1776 by pkx1...@gmail.com: Doc: NR - Polymetric
Notation \compoundMeter isn't documented
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1776
Oh, also
Is there any 'difference' between
\compoundMeter #'(3 2 8)
and
\compoundMeter #'((3 2 8))
as I cannot use
34 matches
Mail list logo
