Re: Issue 298 in lilypond: Ties do not appear when shortened because of an accidental

2011-07-14 Thread lilypond
Updates: Owner: --- Labels: -Priority-Low Priority-Medium Comment #6 on issue 298 by brownian.box: Ties do not appear when shortened because of an accidental http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=298 Issues 840 and 1219 have other good samples.

Re: Issue 298 in lilypond: Ties do not appear when shortened because of an accidental

2011-07-12 Thread lilypond
Updates: Cc: lemzw...@googlemail.com Comment #5 on issue 298 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Ties do not appear when shortened because of an accidental http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=298 Issue 840 has been merged into this issue.

Re: Issue 298 in lilypond: Ties do not appear when shortened because of an accidental

2011-07-12 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 298 by colinpkc...@gmail.com: Ties do not appear when shortened because of an accidental http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=298 Issue 1219 has been merged into this issue. ___ bug-lilypond mailing list

Issue 298 in lilypond: Ties do not appear when shortened because of an accidental

2008-05-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 298: Ties do not appear when shortened because of an accidental http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=298 Comment #2 by v.villenave: Yes indeed. IIUC: %%% \version 2.11.45 \relative { s2. ees g c4~ | ees g c ~ ees aes c4 s2 | } % The upper tie does not appear, though the

Issue 298 in lilypond: Ties do not appear when shortened because of an accidental

2008-05-01 Thread codesite-noreply
Issue 298: Ties do not appear when shortened because of an accidental http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=298 Comment #3 by n.puttock: I encounter this issue all the time (also with ties avoiding flags); would it be considered bad style if the tie ignored the accidental in this