Eluze writes:
Phil Holmes-2 wrote
It's taken me a while to work out what's going on here, but it looks like
it's caused by an incorrect assumption in the snippet, and a change in
behaviour from \stemDown.
The incorrect assumption in that \stemDown isn't needed - it is. The red
notes
hi Colin
fully aggreed - I think(hope) that when upgrading the LSR there will be
tests to make sure the results are the same - or nicer :-) .
so we better don't flood the tracker.
Eluze
Am 12.01.2013 13:25, schrieb Colin Hall:
Eluze writes:
Phil Holmes-2 wrote
It's taken me a while to
in the last (combined) staff of http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=199
Different colored note heads in one staff the tuplet number is doubled
since version 2.15.7
see png noteHeadColoring.png
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n139306/noteHeadColoring.png
don't know if we need a
Eluze writes:
in the last (combined) staff of http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=199
Different colored note heads in one staff the tuplet number is doubled
since version 2.15.7
I just checked that page and there is no doubling of the
notehead.
So I assume you mean that compiling LSR 199
Eluze elu...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:1357914316279-139306.p...@n5.nabble.com...
in the last (combined) staff of http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=199
Different colored note heads in one staff the tuplet number is doubled
since version 2.15.7
see png noteHeadColoring.png
Phil Holmes-2 wrote
It's taken me a while to work out what's going on here, but it looks like
it's caused by an incorrect assumption in the snippet, and a change in
behaviour from \stemDown.
The incorrect assumption in that \stemDown isn't needed - it is. The red
notes are placed in an
