Graham Percival gra...@percival-music.ca wrote in message
news:20101209140258.ga16...@futoi...
Again, please keep the discussion on the mailing list.
I disagree with your proper behaviour, since you should never
put the lilypond bin/ directory in your PATH. For help settng up
lilypond, see:
Again, please keep the discussion on the mailing list.
Whoops. Please accept my apologies, Graham.
This is probably my final follow up to the following situation:
- in OS X, if the lilypond .../bin ends up in the $PATH of a user or
application, then at least one of the executables (gs) that
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 09:15:22AM -0700, Henry Flurry wrote:
FINAL FOLLOW UP QUESTION
Is this how you intend lilypond to be accessed by other
processes? Through the scripts in ~/bin?
Yes. Either ~/bin/, or via scripts internal to other programs.
For example, LyX could ask you for the
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:06:22PM -0700, Henry Flurry wrote:
James I have been in discussions on gs behavior if it ends up being
executed outside of the lilypond environment, in OS X.
Sorry, I'm confused.
First: please keep bug reports or feature requests on the
bug-lilypond mailing
Again, please keep the discussion on the mailing list.
I disagree with your proper behaviour, since you should never
put the lilypond bin/ directory in your PATH. For help settng up
lilypond, see:
http://lilypond.org/macos-x.html
macosx on the command line.
I am not opposed to considering a
