On 28 February 2013 01:05, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Xavier,
do you think of sth like this:
(snip)
Hi Thomas,
Thank you for your answer.
I did not use the 'bound-padding property but I was overriding MMR
'minimum-length to different values corresponding to my
On 28 February 2013 05:25, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
As far as I know, they are treated similarly.
OK, thanks.
Why should there be a difference? The idea of having compressed
MMRs is to save horizontal space, isn't it?
I did not claim there should be a difference, I was asking
IIRC I increased the horizontal space of compressed MMR in order to
prevent overlapping of tempo indications in a piece for an
instrument part with many MMR (similar to what Kieren is also
asking/fighting AFAIK).
Aah, but this is a different problem (which can be very annoying, I
know).
2013/3/4 Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com:
On 28 February 2013 01:05, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi Xavier,
do you think of sth like this:
(snip)
Hi Thomas,
Thank you for your answer.
I did not use the 'bound-padding property but I was overriding MMR
On 27 February 2013 18:13, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Comment #1 on issue 3208 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Wrong
MultiMeasureRest glyph
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3208
OK - let's just be clear about what the bug is. Lilypond does the right
thing (TM) for
2013/2/28 Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com:
On 27 February 2013 18:13, lilyp...@googlecode.com wrote:
Comment #1 on issue 3208 by philehol...@googlemail.com: Wrong
MultiMeasureRest glyph
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3208
OK - let's just be clear about what the bug
2013/2/28 Xavier Scheuer x.sche...@gmail.com:
I sometimes wanted different horizontal space settings for single Whole
Measure Rest and real multimeasure rests a.k.a compressed MMR
(with a number above).
Hi again.
BTW, you could print the MultiMeasureRestNumber on a single Whole
Measure Rest,
1. Are single Whole Measure Rest and compressed MMR two different
things, and treated as such, with specific rules, etc. in references
like Ross, Read, Gould?
As far as I know, they are treated similarly. Why should there be a
difference? The idea of having compressed MMRs is to save
