Re: TupletNumber regression

2012-05-24 Thread Colin Hall
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 08:19:11PM +0200, m...@apollinemike.com wrote: On 22 mai 2012, at 19:17, JD Duncan wrote: The following snippet shows a measure where the TupletNumber has good placement in 2.14.2 but strange placement in 2.15.38. JD Dear JD, In LilyPond 2.15.38,

Re: TupletNumber regression

2012-05-23 Thread John David Duncan
Dear JD, In LilyPond 2.15.38, TupletNumber placement automatically follows the voice, not the stem direction. You've inverted the traditional stem direction of voices (usually the top voice points up), and the TupletNumber does not automatically follow this. To change this, you can

Re: TupletNumber regression

2012-05-23 Thread Keith OHara
John David Duncan john.david.duncan at gmail.com writes: In LilyPond 2.15.38, TupletNumber placement automatically follows the voice, not the stem direction. You've inverted the traditional stem direction of voices (usually the top voice points up), and the TupletNumber does not

TupletNumber regression

2012-05-22 Thread JD Duncan
I'm not top posting. The following snippet shows a measure where the TupletNumber has good placement in 2.14.2 but strange placement in 2.15.38. JD \language english Score begins here \parallelMusic #'(pianoRH dynamics pianoLH) { % Measure 9 { \stemDown df''2\arpeggio s2 } \\

Re: TupletNumber regression

2012-05-22 Thread m...@apollinemike.com
On 22 mai 2012, at 19:17, JD Duncan wrote: I'm not top posting. The following snippet shows a measure where the TupletNumber has good placement in 2.14.2 but strange placement in 2.15.38. JD \language english Score begins here \parallelMusic #'(pianoRH dynamics