I suppose that a short-term solution would be to simply push the
@bs{} patch. It feels a bit icky, but that's hardly the ickiest
part of lilypond development. And it's inconsistent to kick up a
fuss now when some other languages already do this.
Well, the @example immediately above the
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:08:02AM +0200, Frédéric Bron wrote:
Well, the @example immediately above the Program files has a \
in the .itexi file, and proudly displays a \ in the output. Why
does this work inside @example but not @code? Is there any way we
can get @code to act like
: missing backslash before Program Files in
http://www.lilypond.org/windows.html
Your thoughts on the best way to go? \\, @bs{} or /Applications/? Do
you confirm you prefer @bs{}?
I already told James that he could push your previous patch.
Cheers,
- Graham
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 06:57:55PM +, James Lowe wrote:
I tried to 'git am' the patch file and got an error 'Patch format detection
failed'.
I've downloaded it via three different methods (in case it was my mail
client) but I cannot apply this to push.
Check the very beginning of the
I tried to 'git am' the patch file and got an error 'Patch format detection
failed'.
I've downloaded it via three different methods (in case it was my mail
client) but I cannot apply this to push.
Sorry, it just produced with diff -u
The one attached is a proper git patch.
Frédéric
Frederic,
From: Frédéric Bron [frederic.b...@m4x.org]
Sent: 19 June 2011 20:32
To: James Lowe
Cc: Graham Percival; bug-lilypond
Subject: Re: missing backslash before Program Files in
http://www.lilypond.org/windows.html
I tried to 'git am' the patch file
backslash before Program Files in
http://www.lilypond.org/windows.html
Frederic,
From: Frédéric Bron [frederic.b...@m4x.org]
Sent: 19 June 2011 20:32
To: James Lowe
Cc: Graham Percival; bug-lilypond
Subject: Re: missing backslash before Program Files
Patch attached.
My build suite is broken, I cannot test but it looks straightforward
as the solution was already used in some translations.
Frédéric
download.patch
Description: Binary data
___
bug-lilypond mailing list
bug-lilypond@gnu.org
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 09:20:59PM +0200, Frédéric Bron wrote:
Patch attached.
My build suite is broken, I cannot test but it looks straightforward
as the solution was already used in some translations.
I really don't think that we should start manually changing /
characters in filenames.
I really don't think that we should start manually changing /
characters in filenames. Can't we find a more general solution
for this?
Some langage files have the following instead:
@code{/Applications/}
When I display the French version for instance, this is replaced by
C:\Program Files.
Is
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 12:02:03AM +0200, Frédéric Bron wrote:
I really don't think that we should start manually changing /
characters in filenames. Can't we find a more general solution
for this?
Some langage files have the following instead:
@code{/Applications/}
huh? That looks
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:24:54PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
ETA: 5 hours of investigating texinfo and texi2html, followed by
writing 1-4 lines of source code.
I suppose that a short-term solution would be to simply push the
@bs{} patch. It feels a bit icky, but that's hardly the ickiest
12 matches
Mail list logo
