Re: \repeat unfold in parallel precludes correct working of \compressMMRests

Simon Albrecht writes: > Hello, > > the following minimal example shows that \compressMMRests doesn’t work > if there’s a \repeat unfold expression in parallel, regardless what > its contents are: > > %%% > \version "2.19.36" > > global = { > \repeat unfold 2

Re: Noteheads slightly too large

Hi Urs, Urs Liska wrote > Are you completely sure that the issue is in LilyPond's output and not in > the displaying program? Well, I don't know how can I be *completely* sure about it, but I see this issue on Evince and Okular pdf readers, as well as in Frescobaldi. If you have some suggestion

Re: Noteheads slightly too large

Gilberto, et al, On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Gilberto Agostinho [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n187039...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > Hi Urs, > > Urs Liska wrote > Are you completely sure that the issue is in LilyPond's output and not in > the displaying program? > > Well, I don't know how can

Re: Noteheads slightly too large

On 09.02.2016 15:14, Gilberto Agostinho wrote: I see this issue on Evince and Okular pdf readers, as well as in Frescobaldi. If you have some suggestion on how to test this further, please let me know. Well, it’s known that on-screen display is often inexact. You might try other backends

Re: Noteheads slightly too large

Hi Schneidy, Schneidy wrote > Here's a workaround That doesn't seem to work for me, I still get the noteheads creeping out the staff lines, and if I lower the magnification value more (like 0.98 or less) the noteheads suddenly get *much* smaller, leaving a hole in between them and the staff

Re: Noteheads slightly too large

Am 9. Februar 2016 14:59:45 MEZ, schrieb Gilberto Agostinho : >Hi Schneidy, > > >Schneidy wrote >> Here's a workaround > >That doesn't seem to work for me, I still get the noteheads creeping >out the >staff lines, and if I lower the magnification value more (like 0.98

Re: Noteheads slightly too large

Hi Simon, Simon Albrecht-2 wrote > You might try > other backends (SVG, PNG), else the best way of testing is printing it > on paper. So I tried this: #(set-global-staff-size 90) { c' d' e' f' } Then exported a png via Frescobaldi using resolution 1200 and in Publish mode, and here is a

Re: Noteheads slightly too large

Hi Paul, Paul Morris wrote > Interesting... Here’s some code for experimenting with this. It scales > notehead stencils. A scaling of 250/276 should make the solid notes equal > to one staff-space. (Or should it be 275/276 to make it the "distance > between the bottom of a staff line to the

Re: Noteheads slightly too large

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:49 AM, Paul Morris [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n187046...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2016, at 10:12 AM, tisimst <[hidden email] > > wrote: > > > > Although microscopic, I can confirm this is true at the font

Re: Noteheads slightly too large

> On Feb 9, 2016, at 10:12 AM, tisimst wrote: > > Although microscopic, I can confirm this is true at the font level (at > least at the default printed 20pt size, I didn't check the other optical > variants). Relative to a 1000-em unit staff height (which is what the

Re: Noteheads slightly too large

Hi Paul, 2016-02-09 16:48 GMT+01:00 Paul Morris : > \version "2.19.36" > > example = \relative { > c' d e f g a b c > } > > { > \example > } > > { > \override NoteHead.stencil = > #(lambda (grob) > (ly:stencil-scale > (ly:note-head::print grob) >

Re: Noteheads slightly too large

Send it again with something more homogeneous: %% \version "2.19.36" #(set-global-staff-size 180) #(set-default-paper-size "a4" 'landscape) #(define (my-note-heads grob) (let* ((style (ly:grob-property grob 'style)) (duration (ly:grob-property grob 'duration-log)))

Re: Noteheads slightly too large

Hi Abraham, What unit is this particular em? In typography at least an em is a measurement equal to the currently specified point size for a font. That does not seem to fit your analysis here. Andrew On 10 February 2016 at 02:12:48, tisimst (tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com) wrote: Relative to a

Re: Noteheads slightly too large

Hi Pierre, > On Feb 9, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Pierre Perol-Schneider > wrote: > > Some thoughts regarding the use of ly:stencil-scale: > 1. the command seems to have a side effect on the stem attachment (or > probably no effect on the note head extents - tested on

Re: Noteheads slightly too large

Andrew, On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Andrew Bernard [via Lilypond] < ml-node+s1069038n187064...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > What unit is this particular em? In typography at least an em is a > measurement equal to the currently specified point size for a font. That > does not seem to fit your