[no subject]

2017-08-27 Thread Christopher Heckman
> From: Dan Eble > Subject: Default repeat type > > It would be convenient if both of these did the same thing: > > A. \lyricmode { Ah __ \repeat unfold 7 _ } > B. \lyricmode { Ah __ \repeat 7 _ } Maybe the user should be able to set the default repeat type? After all,

Re: Skip should end lyric extender

2017-08-27 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Morley writes: > 2017-08-26 20:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> Dan Eble writes: >> >>> %% Semantically, the melisma ends at the skip. >>> %% In the output, the extender continues to the next syllable. > [...] >> I've had other

Re: Skip should end lyric extender

2017-08-27 Thread David Kastrup
Knut Petersen writes: > Hi David! > >> The takeaway for this is that extenders at the current point of time >> often don't work as expected and are pretty hard to make do something >> useful. I have a hard time figuring out what the current behavior is >> supposed to

Re: Skip should end lyric extender

2017-08-27 Thread Thomas Morley
2017-08-26 20:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Dan Eble writes: > >> %% Semantically, the melisma ends at the skip. >> %% In the output, the extender continues to the next syllable. [...] > I've had other occasions where I had not been able to make an extender > end

Re: Skip should end lyric extender

2017-08-27 Thread Knut Petersen
Hi David! The takeaway for this is that extenders at the current point of time often don't work as expected and are pretty hard to make do something useful. I have a hard time figuring out what the current behavior is supposed to be good for, or what the rules governing it actually are.