lilypond-2.1.0-2 - many notes an octave too low

2003-12-02 Thread lilypond
From the tutorial example showing the key signature, accidentals and ties in action: \score { \notes { \time 4/4 \key g \minor \clef violin r4 r8 a8 gis4 b g8 d4.~ d e'8 fis4 fis8 fis8 eis4 a8 gis~ gis2 r2 } \paper { } } The result from debian package lilypond-2.1.0-2

Issue 890 in lilypond: Chords and Lyrics under 2.13.6

2009-10-31 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: jameseli...@googlemail.com Labels: Priority-Regression New issue 890 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: Chords and Lyrics under 2.13.6 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=890 Chords and lyrics don't mix well in 2.13.6 \paper { indent = 0\mm } \version 2.13.6

Re: Issue 890 in lilypond: Chords and Lyrics under 2.13.6

2009-10-31 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 890 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: Chords and Lyrics under 2.13.6 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=890 (No comment was entered for this change.) Attachments: chords and lyrics.png 12.8 KB -- You received this message because you are listed

Re: Issue 890 in lilypond: Chord names collide with staff on second system when lyrics are present

2009-10-31 Thread lilypond
Updates: Summary: Chord names collide with staff on second system when lyrics are present Labels: Type-Collision Comment #2 on issue 890 by Carl.D.Sorensen: Chord names collide with staff on second system when lyrics are present http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id

Re: Issue 890 in lilypond: Chord names collide with staff on second system when lyrics are present

2009-10-31 Thread lilypond
Comment #3 on issue 890 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: Chord names collide with staff on second system when lyrics are present http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=890 No worries. Also, on some music that I have, with multiple verses and different kinds of chords, I don't get

Re: Issue 890 in lilypond: Chord names collide with staff on second system when lyrics are present

2009-10-31 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 890 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: Chord names collide with staff on second system when lyrics are present http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=890 No worries. Also, on some music that I have, with multiple verses and different kinds of chords, I don't get

Issue 891 in lilypond: test of review request, ignore

2009-11-02 Thread lilypond
Status: New Owner: percival.music.ca Labels: Type-Review Priority-Medium New issue 891 by percival.music.ca: test of review request, ignore http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=891 This is a test of the review request thingie. -- You received this message because you

Re: Issue 891 in lilypond: test of review request, ignore

2009-11-02 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 891 by percival.music.ca: test of review request, ignore http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=891 Nope, we don't want do use this. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue

Issue 892 in lilypond: Request for Patch review: Twoside mode

2009-11-02 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: neziap CC: xmichae...@web.de Labels: Type-Enhancement New issue 892 by neziap: Request for Patch review: Twoside mode http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=892 Original Message (Michael Käpler): http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-10

Re: Issue 892 in lilypond: Patch: Twoside mode (different margins on odd and even pages)

2009-11-02 Thread lilypond
Updates: Summary: Patch: Twoside mode (different margins on odd and even pages) Status: Started Labels: Patch Comment #1 on issue 892 by v.villenave: Patch: Twoside mode (different margins on odd and even pages) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=892

Re: Issue 892 in lilypond: Patch: Twoside mode (different margins on odd and even pages)

2009-11-02 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 892 by percival.music.ca: Patch: Twoside mode (different margins on odd and even pages) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=892 Looks good. It's been a few days, and nobody made any replies about the code, so it's definitely a good time to add

Re: Issue 892 in lilypond: Patch: Twoside mode (different margins on odd and even pages)

2009-11-02 Thread lilypond
Comment #3 on issue 892 by n.puttock: Patch: Twoside mode (different margins on odd and even pages) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=892 The replies are here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-10/msg00305.html If comments are made on Rietveld, a new

Re: Issue 892 in lilypond: Patch: Twoside mode (different margins on odd and even pages)

2009-11-02 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 892 by gpermus: Patch: Twoside mode (different margins on odd and even pages) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=892 Oops, sorry. I think that as long as we know that Rietveld makes a new thread, it should be fine. -- You received this message because

Issue 893 in lilypond: rehearsal marks

2009-11-02 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: jameseli...@googlemail.com Labels: Priority-Regression Type-Defect New issue 893 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: rehearsal marks http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=893 Rehearsal Marks should be placed below the system, not the first staff: \version 2.13.4

Re: Issue 893 in lilypond: rehearsal marks

2009-11-02 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 893 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: rehearsal marks http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=893 Note, there is a workaround here: and a caveat for using the workaround later in the thread, here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2009-09/msg00033

Re: Issue 893 in lilypond: rehearsal marks with direction DOWN should go below the system

2009-11-02 Thread lilypond
Updates: Summary: rehearsal marks with direction DOWN should go below the system Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_8 Comment #2 on issue 893 by joeneeman: rehearsal marks with direction DOWN should go below the system http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id

Re: Issue 871 in lilypond: support for MacOS X 10.6 snow leopard

2009-11-05 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 871 by marnenlk: support for MacOS X 10.6 snow leopard http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=871 Whether the main developers have Snow Leopard or not, this is a high-priority issue, since it effectively renders the program nearly unusable on Mac OS X. It does

Re: Issue 871 in lilypond: support for MacOS X 10.6 snow leopard

2009-11-05 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_7 Comment #2 on issue 871 by percival.music.ca: support for MacOS X 10.6 snow leopard http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=871 Before criticizing, learn what the Priority means to us. It means should we delay a stable

Re: Issue 871 in lilypond: support for MacOS X 10.6 snow leopard

2009-11-05 Thread lilypond
Comment #3 on issue 871 by marnenlk: support for MacOS X 10.6 snow leopard http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=871 Yes, I just discovered that build, and it appears to fix the problem. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields

Re: Issue 871 in lilypond: support for MacOS X 10.6 snow leopard

2009-11-05 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 871 by marnenlk: support for MacOS X 10.6 snow leopard http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=871 percival.music.ca wrote: Our guideline for a stable release is does it work better than the previous version. But...no, 2.13.6 did not work better than

Re: Issue 871 in lilypond: support for MacOS X 10.6 snow leopard

2009-11-05 Thread lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 871 by percival.music.ca: support for MacOS X 10.6 snow leopard http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=871 marnelk wrote: Our guideline for a stable release is does it work better than the previous version. But...no, 2.13.6 did not work better than

Issue 896 in lilypond: When used after \tag, \partcombine may fail to print notes

2009-11-05 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: jameseli...@googlemail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 896 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: When used after \tag, \partcombine may fail to print notes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=896 \version 2.13.6 music = { \set

Re: Issue 895 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails on Windows due to missing time.dll

2009-11-06 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Accepted Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Regression OpSys-Windows lilypond-book Comment #1 on issue 895 by v.villenave: lilypond-book fails on Windows due to missing time.dll http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=895 Thanks, marking as Accepted

Issue 897 in lilypond: key signatures should be inherited by all Voices (no matter their accidental style)

2009-11-06 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: v.villenave Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 897 by v.villenave: key signatures should be inherited by all Voices (no matter their accidental style) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=897 In the following example, no natural sign

Issue 898 in lilypond: Enhancement: rests should be taken into account when determining beaming intervals

2009-11-06 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: v.villenave Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Engraving-nitpick New issue 898 by v.villenave: Enhancement: rests should be taken into account when determining beaming intervals http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=898 The attached example shows

Issue 899 in lilypond: full-measure-extra-space should be more flexible

2009-11-06 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: v.villenave Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Regression Engraving-nitpick New issue 899 by v.villenave: full-measure-extra-space should be more flexible http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=899 New report from Trevor D.: Between 2.11.9 and 2.11.10 (see

Issue 900 in lilypond: Wrong chords and lyrics spacing may cause collisions

2009-11-06 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: v.villenave CC: joeneeman Labels: Type-Collision Priority-Regression New issue 900 by v.villenave: Wrong chords and lyrics spacing may cause collisions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=900 In the following example, the spacing is intentionally tight

Re: Issue 892 in lilypond: Patch: Twoside mode (different margins on odd and even pages)

2009-11-06 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Verified Comment #5 on issue 892 by v.villenave: Patch: Twoside mode (different margins on odd and even pages) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=892 OK, the patch has been merged as a7f5c5abf97ad7c54122dac22cc9574ce082e3d9. Closing. -- You

Re: Issue 900 in lilypond: Wrong chords and lyrics spacing may cause collisions

2009-11-07 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 900 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: Wrong chords and lyrics spacing may cause collisions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=900 This is the same as http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=890 -- You received this message because you are listed

Re: Issue 890 in lilypond: Chord names collide with staff on second system when lyrics are present

2009-11-07 Thread lilypond
Updates: Cc: joeneeman Comment #5 on issue 890 by v.villenave: Chord names collide with staff on second system when lyrics are present http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=890 Issue 900 has been merged into this issue. -- You received this message because you

Re: Issue 900 in lilypond: Wrong chords and lyrics spacing may cause collisions

2009-11-07 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Duplicate Cc: -joeneeman Mergedinto: 890 Comment #2 on issue 900 by v.villenave: Wrong chords and lyrics spacing may cause collisions http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=900 Indeed. Marking as duplicate. -- You received this message

Re: Issue 800 in lilypond: Melismas extenders are broken when there's another staff

2009-11-10 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 800 by organsnyder: Melismas extenders are broken when there's another staff http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=800 Patch that fixes this and issue 786 is available on Rietveld: http://codereview.appspot.com/150067 -- You received this message because you

Re: Issue 786 in lilypond: Extenders in lyrics stop prematurely if a single underscore is found

2009-11-10 Thread lilypond
Comment #6 on issue 786 by organsnyder: Extenders in lyrics stop prematurely if a single underscore is found http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=786 Patch that fixes this and issue 800 is available on Rietveld: http://codereview.appspot.com/150067 -- You received

Re: Issue 871 in lilypond: support for MacOS X 10.6 snow leopard

2009-11-11 Thread lilypond
Comment #6 on issue 871 by fodber: support for MacOS X 10.6 snow leopard http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=871 the (dreadful) jEdit LilyPondTool I hope you are joking. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you

Re: Issue 800 in lilypond: Melismas extenders are broken when there's another staff

2009-11-11 Thread lilypond
Comment #3 on issue 800 by organsnyder: Melismas extenders are broken when there's another staff http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=800 Nevermind about that patch - it was the wrong approach. I'm working on determining the correct one. -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 887 in lilypond: PDF point-and-click URI links with special chars wrongly encoded depending on the OS

2009-11-12 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 887 by pnorcks: PDF point-and-click URI links with special chars wrongly encoded depending on the OS http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=887 So, if I understand correctly, the URIs should be using percent escape codes for all non-ASCII characters

Re: Issue 887 in lilypond: PDF point-and-click URI links with special chars wrongly encoded depending on the OS

2009-11-12 Thread lilypond
Comment #3 on issue 887 by harmathdenes: PDF point-and-click URI links with special chars wrongly encoded depending on the OS http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=887 Yes, I think that would be correct. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC

Re: Issue 513 in lilypond: abc2ly tempo mark and typos

2009-11-12 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: --- Comment #2 on issue 513 by reinhold.kainhofer: abc2ly tempo mark and typos http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=513 First issue (Q: only converted to some midi settings, but not to \tempo) is fixed with commit

Re: Issue 512 in lilypond: abc2ly church modes

2009-11-12 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: --- Comment #2 on issue 512 by reinhold.kainhofer: abc2ly church modes http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=512 Fixed in commit ba4589749d489baf05866ec282d7f7e0177c3bff The main problem was that the comparison was done without

Re: Issue 450 in lilypond: input/regression/tuplet-properties.ly

2009-11-12 Thread lilypond
Updates: Owner: percival.music.ca Comment #3 on issue 450 by reinhold.kainhofer: input/regression/tuplet-properties.ly http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=450 in 2.13.7, the tuplet number is above the note in the second tuplet... I'm not sure what the preferred

Re: Issue 471 in lilypond: explicitKeySignatureVisibility shouldn't be necessary here

2009-11-12 Thread lilypond
Updates: Owner: percival.music.ca Comment #1 on issue 471 by reinhold.kainhofer: explicitKeySignatureVisibility shouldn't be necessary here http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=471 In 2.12 and 2.13.7, I can't see any different with and without the \once\set... What's

Re: Issue 866 in lilypond: gub should use a real buildnumber

2009-11-12 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_7 Comment #1 on issue 866 by percival.music.ca: gub should use a real buildnumber http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=866 Fixed in 2.13.7. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields

Re: Issue 471 in lilypond: explicitKeySignatureVisibility shouldn't be necessary here

2009-11-12 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 471 by percival.music.ca: explicitKeySignatureVisibility shouldn't be necessary here http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=471 Great example of the badness of having no attached png! :( I _think_ the problem is the very right-hand side of the staff

Re: Issue 894 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4

2009-11-12 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Invalid Comment #1 on issue 894 by percival.music.ca: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=894 I'm sorry, but I'm marking this as invalid unless somebody can replicate it with a clean OSX system

Issue 901 in lilypond: gub: lilypad.exe has a 40% chance of being included

2009-11-12 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: percival.music.ca Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Low OpSys-Windows New issue 901 by percival.music.ca: gub: lilypad.exe has a 40% chance of being included http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=901 lilypad.exe is not always copied into the tarball

Re: Issue 894 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4

2009-11-12 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 894 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=894 How do you define clean? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue

Re: Issue 894 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4

2009-11-12 Thread lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 894 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=894 The only change that's been made here is to lilypond-book, to have it point to the newer python version shipped with LilyPond

Re: Issue 894 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4

2009-11-12 Thread lilypond
Comment #6 on issue 894 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=894 I should note that this is also the same error reported if, rather than change lilypond-book, the PATH is changed to put

Re: Issue 890 in lilypond: Chord names collide with staff on second system when lyrics are present

2009-11-12 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_8 Comment #6 on issue 890 by joeneeman: Chord names collide with staff on second system when lyrics are present http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=890 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received

Re: Issue 861 in lilypond: website contains bad html

2009-11-13 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 861 by reinhold.kainhofer: website contains bad html http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=861 Fixed in commit b7bc9a032c8504d34d5600b21c25920947a60e92 -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you

Re: Issue 800 in lilypond: Melismas extenders are broken when there's another staff

2009-11-13 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 800 by organsnyder: Melismas extenders are broken when there's another staff http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=800 Sorry for the noise, but the patch referenced above is valid again, and appears to properly fix this bug. -- You received this message

Re: Issue 861 in lilypond: website contains bad html

2009-11-13 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 861 by percival.music.ca: website contains bad html http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=861 Great! Could we get it in web-texi2html.init as well, then mark it as fixed? -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields

Re: Issue 847 in lilypond: python scripts should add an autogenerated marker

2009-11-13 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 847 by percival.music.ca: python scripts should add an autogenerated marker http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=847 I think the idea is that if a script adds/changes something in HTML, it should add something like -- generated from scripts/build/www

Re: Issue 818 in lilypond: Bus error when adding Instrument_name_engraver to StaffGroup and outputting MIDI.

2009-11-13 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 818 by reinhold.kainhofer: Bus error when adding Instrument_name_engraver to StaffGroup and outputting MIDI. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=818 The file compiles just fine with 2.13.7 and 2.12.2 under Linux (Kubuntu) -- You received this message

Re: Issue 800 in lilypond: Melismas extenders are broken when there's another staff

2009-11-13 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_8 Comment #5 on issue 800 by n.puttock: Melismas extenders are broken when there's another staff http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=800 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 786 in lilypond: Extenders in lyrics stop prematurely if a single underscore is found

2009-11-13 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_8 Comment #7 on issue 786 by n.puttock: Extenders in lyrics stop prematurely if a single underscore is found http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=786 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received

Re: Issue 895 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails on Windows due to missing time.dll

2009-11-13 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_8 Comment #2 on issue 895 by percival.music.ca: lilypond-book fails on Windows due to missing time.dll http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=895 I think this is fixed. -- You received this message because you are listed

Re: Issue 764 in lilypond: convert-ly does not work in the lilypad for OSX 10.4

2009-11-13 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_5 Comment #7 on issue 764 by percival.music.ca: convert-ly does not work in the lilypad for OSX 10.4 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=764 I believe this is fixed. NB: this is when invoking convert-ly **from

Re: Issue 402 in lilypond: osx intel app lists itself as ppc

2009-11-13 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: percival.music.ca Labels: fixed_2_13_4 Comment #1 on issue 402 by percival.music.ca: osx intel app lists itself as ppc http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=402 I believe this was fixed. -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 894 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4

2009-11-13 Thread lilypond
Updates: Labels: OpSys-OSX Comment #7 on issue 894 by percival.music.ca: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=894 Don't change anything inside the App bundle. Try setting $PYTHONHOME to point to somewhere inside

Re: Issue 894 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4

2009-11-14 Thread lilypond
Comment #8 on issue 894 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=894 I feel like I'm going to have to re-write the set up for Mac OSX portion. -- You received this message because you are listed

Re: Issue 894 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4

2009-11-14 Thread lilypond
Comment #10 on issue 894 by percival.music.ca: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=894 you still get this message? Could not find platform independent libraries prefix Could not find platform dependent libraries

Issue 902 in lilypond: Support for primo and secondo page layout

2009-11-14 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: lemzwerg Labels: Type-Enhancement New issue 902 by lemzwerg: Support for primo and secondo page layout http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=902 `Classical' layout of four-handed piano music positions the staves for the left player (`secondo') on the left

Re: Issue 894 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4

2009-11-14 Thread lilypond
Comment #11 on issue 894 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=894 Exactly. I don't have clue #1 where else to set PYTHONHOME to, other than the location of the python executable (LilyPond.app

Re: Issue 894 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4

2009-11-14 Thread lilypond
Comment #12 on issue 894 by percival.music.ca: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=894 James, I'm sorry, but there's so many demands on me right now (both lilypond and otherwise), so my sanity can't afford to have me

Re: Issue 894 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4

2009-11-14 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: New Comment #13 on issue 894 by jameseli...@googlemail.com: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=894 Until someone else who's smarter than I, and has more time than you can take a look

Re: Issue 768 in lilypond: Enhancement: syntax shortcut for repeated chords

2009-11-15 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_8 Comment #1 on issue 768 by nicolas.sceaux: Enhancement: syntax shortcut for repeated chords http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=768 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because you

Re: Issue 894 in lilypond: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4

2009-11-15 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Accepted Comment #14 on issue 894 by v.villenave: lilypond-book fails from the command-line in OSX 10.4 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=894 James, if you're reopening this as a bug meister (not a simple user), the correct status should

Issue 903 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages

2009-11-15 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: v.villenave CC: percival.music.ca Labels: Type-Enhancement Usability Priority-Medium OpSys-All New issue 903 by v.villenave: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=903 Currently

Re: Issue 887 in lilypond: PDF point-and-click URI links with special chars wrongly encoded depending on the OS

2009-11-15 Thread lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 887 by pnorcks: PDF point-and-click URI links with special chars wrongly encoded depending on the OS http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=887 Also, I'm not sure how Latin-2 fits into this issue. Isn't Latin-2 a single-byte ASCII extension? \303\241

Re: Issue 865 in lilypond: Enhancement: ancient tablatures support

2009-11-16 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 865 by tdanielsmusic: Enhancement: ancient tablatures support http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=865 I've decided to make a start on this. Not sure how far I'll be able to get though. I'll report progress on the tablature list. -- You received

Re: Issue 836 in lilypond: Enhancement: output-suffix as a (Score) context property

2009-11-16 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 836 by i...@hulin.org.uk: Enhancement: output-suffix as a (Score) context property http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=836 I wasn't able to implement output-prefix and filename as contexts to \book easily, so we now have \bookOutputSuffix newsuffix

Re: Issue 903 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages

2009-11-16 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 903 by veryfurryfur: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=903 The fact that it cannot be used in safe mode is only one manifestation of a more fundamental issue. \include italiano.ly

Re: Issue 903 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages

2009-11-17 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 903 by Carl.D.Sorensen: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=903 In keeping with LilyPond style we should use \language italiano or \noteLanguage italiano We should not use \lang because

Re: Issue 903 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages

2009-11-17 Thread lilypond
Comment #3 on issue 903 by fodber: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=903 It doesn't need a new command, only a bit of reorganization. The command is there: #(ly:parser-set-note-names parser

Re: Issue 887 in lilypond: PDF point-and-click URI links with special chars wrongly encoded depending on the OS

2009-11-17 Thread lilypond
Comment #7 on issue 887 by fodber: PDF point-and-click URI links with special chars wrongly encoded depending on the OS http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=887 Dénes, the jpedal is actually broken: the new String(uriDecodedBytes) is made using platform-specific encoding

Re: Issue 628 in lilypond: Regression: markup \note doesn't work as a TimeSignature stencil

2009-11-18 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 628 by percival.music.ca: Regression: markup \note doesn't work as a TimeSignature stencil http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=628 Ok, so we think it's fixed? Bug people, please check with 2.13.7. -- You received

Re: Issue 628 in lilypond: Regression: markup \note doesn't work as a TimeSignature stencil

2009-11-18 Thread lilypond
Comment #4 on issue 628 by reinhold.kainhofer: Regression: markup \note doesn't work as a TimeSignature stencil http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=628 No, it doesn't work with 2.13.7. The note in the denominator is simply not printed (but there is also no warning/error

Re: Issue 628 in lilypond: Regression: markup \note doesn't work as a TimeSignature stencil

2009-11-18 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Accepted Comment #5 on issue 628 by percival.music.ca: Regression: markup \note doesn't work as a TimeSignature stencil http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=628 Ok, I misread Patrick's comment. But why does the title say regression, when the actual

Re: Issue 628 in lilypond: Regression: markup \note doesn't work as a TimeSignature stencil

2009-11-18 Thread lilypond
Comment #6 on issue 628 by pnorcks: Regression: markup \note doesn't work as a TimeSignature stencil http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=628 I should have said that using \numericTimeSignature is a workaround (last time I checked). Apparently it worked in 2.8, so I assume

Issue 904 in lilypond: Regression: partially-tied chords may look wrong when the tie flips

2009-11-19 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: v.villenave Labels: Priority-Regression Type-Defect New issue 904 by v.villenave: Regression: partially-tied chords may look wrong when the tie flips http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=904 \version 2.12.0 % or 2.13.7 % When two chords are tied

Re: Issue 746 in lilypond: Automatic code indentation improvement (and replacing tabs with spaces)

2009-11-19 Thread lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 746 by v.villenave: Automatic code indentation improvement (and replacing tabs with spaces) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=746 Please also have a look at Graham's howto on http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-11/msg00357.html

Issue 905 in lilypond: LilyPond should accept UTF-8 BOM signatures even if preceded with other chars

2009-11-19 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: v.villenave Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Encoding New issue 905 by v.villenave: LilyPond should accept UTF-8 BOM signatures even if preceded with other chars http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=905 Currently, LilyPond fails to parse UTF-8 files

Issue 906 in lilypond: gs fails in jail mode unless run separately with sudo (error 32512)

2009-11-19 Thread lilypond
Status: Accepted Owner: v.villenave Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Jail New issue 906 by v.villenave: gs fails in jail mode unless run separately with sudo (error 32512) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=906 New report from Bertalan: \version 2.13.7 I set up

Re: Issue 573 in lilypond: score-final mark mangles score-final tuplet bracket

2009-11-19 Thread lilypond
Comment #10 on issue 573 by frederic...@m4x.org: score-final mark mangles score-final tuplet bracket http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=573 Graham said: I think we just need a few words or a snippet or something to close this. Can anybody tell me what to do? What do we

Re: Issue 903 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages

2009-11-19 Thread lilypond
Comment #5 on issue 903 by n.puttock: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=903 I broadly agree with Carl's comments. I'm not fussed about having block scope, since it's easy enough to implement

Re: Issue 573 in lilypond: score-final mark mangles score-final tuplet bracket

2009-11-20 Thread lilypond
Comment #11 on issue 573 by percival.music.ca: score-final mark mangles score-final tuplet bracket http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=573 Valentin said that we needed a new snippet or changing an old one. Neil said that it should be a new snippet. I thought this was clear

Re: Issue 676 in lilypond: unterminated ties should not be rendered in MIDI

2009-11-20 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: fixed_2_13_8 Comment #2 on issue 676 by reinhold.kainhofer: unterminated ties should not be rendered in MIDI http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=676 Fixed in latest git master (commit 1216caa5de472f1324fbcc0a5e08b560389307e7

Re: Issue 573 in lilypond: score-final mark mangles score-final tuplet bracket

2009-11-21 Thread lilypond
Comment #12 on issue 573 by n.puttock: score-final mark mangles score-final tuplet bracket http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=573 I'm now not so sure adding a snippet is the right approach here, since this seems to be the same bug as #492 (see my comments in this thread

Re: Issue 903 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages

2009-11-22 Thread lilypond
Comment #6 on issue 903 by veryfurryfur: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=903 As for the syntax, my choice would be \language italiano because it's simpler, quicker and we don't need to change it in case

Re: Issue 903 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages

2009-11-22 Thread lilypond
Comment #7 on issue 903 by percival.music.ca: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=903 My only caution is that we might want to save this change until 3.0. That said, it should be relatively easy to do

Re: Issue 854 in lilypond: lilycontrib.tcl

2009-11-22 Thread lilypond
Comment #2 on issue 854 by percival.music.ca: lilycontrib.tcl http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=854 Later versions of this script can be found on the Frogs mailist: http://frogs.lilynet.net/ -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields

Re: Issue 838 in lilypond: Inconsistency in tests output size

2009-11-22 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 838 by percival.music.ca: Inconsistency in tests output size http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=838 More info here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2009-11/msg2.html -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner

Re: Issue 837 in lilypond: Unnecessary empty dirs in Win32 builds

2009-11-22 Thread lilypond
Updates: Status: Fixed Cc: -gpermus Labels: fixed_2_13_8 Comment #2 on issue 837 by pnorcks: Unnecessary empty dirs in Win32 builds http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=837 Fixed by this GUB commit: http://github.com/janneke/gub/commit

Re: Issue 903 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages

2009-11-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #8 on issue 903 by veryfurryfur: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=903 I really cannot see any risks involved to warrant waiting for a major release. If you disagree, please come forward

Re: Issue 903 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages

2009-11-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #9 on issue 903 by d...@gnu.org: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=903 A major change in general input syntax, even optional, should be accompanied by a noticeable version number change. -- You

Re: Issue 898 in lilypond: Enhancement: rests should be taken into account when determining beaming intervals

2009-11-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #1 on issue 898 by d...@gnu.org: Enhancement: rests should be taken into account when determining beaming intervals http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=898 It would also make sense to have an option to allow automatic beaming across rests when a note instead

Re: Issue 903 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages

2009-11-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #10 on issue 903 by veryfurryfur: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=903 I don't mean it in a confrontational way, but may I ask what the rationale is please? -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 903 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages

2009-11-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #11 on issue 903 by d...@gnu.org: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=903 Tool x can process Lilypond files of version y or later - that's sensible for an announcement. convert-ly also has to work

Re: Issue 903 in lilypond: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages

2009-11-23 Thread lilypond
Comment #12 on issue 903 by hanwenn: Enhancement: a more user-friendly way to specify notename languages http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=903 Would the language feature be feasible to implement as a music function with no arguments? (the function implementation has

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >