Re: 2.13.16 crashes while processing old good file (2.8.8 and 2.12.3 do not)

2010-06-22 Thread Dmytro O. Redchuk
On Mon 21 Jun 2010, 18:06 I wrote: I do believe this is somewhat related to 884: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=884 No, it is not; at least that problem didn't disappear. Well... I'll look closer. Still having problem trying to compose an example of more or less

Re: 2.13.16 crashes while processing old good file (2.8.8 and 2.12.3 do not)

2010-06-22 Thread Dmytro O. Redchuk
On Tue 22 Jun 2010, 13:14 I wrote: On Mon 21 Jun 2010, 18:06 I wrote: I do believe this is somewhat related to 884: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=884 No, it is not; at least that problem didn't disappear. Well... I'll look closer. Still having problem trying to

Re: 2.13.16 crashes while processing old good file (2.8.8 and 2.12.3 do not)

2010-06-21 Thread Phil Holmes
Dmytro O. Redchuk brownian@gmail.com wrote in message news:1269355703.19166.179.ca...@dor... У вт, 2010-03-23 у 08:25 -0600, Carl Sorensen пише: The clue here is that there is some kind of break in the middle of the score that you've put in manually that confuses the layout engine. My

Re: 2.13.16 crashes while processing old good file (2.8.8 and 2.12.3 do not)

2010-06-21 Thread Dmytro O. Redchuk
On Mon 21 Jun 2010, 15:29 Phil Holmes wrote: Just remove the /pageBreak in the middle of your score and it works perfectly. Yes, almost .) (I can use both system-count and page-count, replace \pageBreak with \break, then adjust spacing to force three-systems-per-page desired layout, with

Re: 2.13.16 crashes while processing old good file (2.8.8 and 2.12.3 do not)

2010-06-21 Thread Dmytro O. Redchuk
On Mon 21 Jun 2010, 17:44 I wrote: So I'm going to break Graham's Bug Squad rule again here, and ask a Thank you .) question. As far as I can see, this shows a critical bug. It may be complex as a bit of Lilypond, but surely something that compiles and displays perfectly under 2.12

2.13.16 crashes while processing old good file (2.8.8 and 2.12.3 do not)

2010-03-23 Thread Dmytro O. Redchuk
Hi. My problem (again, yes, my own,) now is that 2.13.16 crashes on a file, which can happily be compiled with 2.12.3 and 2.8.8 (2.13.0 segfaults, did not try others yet). Having no idea how to debug, i would like to ask what can i do to narrow down this problem. (Stripping the code to

Re: 2.13.16 crashes while processing old good file (2.8.8 and 2.12.3 do not)

2010-03-23 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 3/23/10 2:26 AM, Dmytro O. Redchuk brownian@gmail.com wrote: Hi. My problem (again, yes, my own,) now is that 2.13.16 crashes on a file, which can happily be compiled with 2.12.3 and 2.8.8 (2.13.0 segfaults, did not try others yet). Having no idea how to debug, i would like to

Re: 2.13.16 crashes while processing old good file (2.8.8 and 2.12.3 do not)

2010-03-23 Thread Reinhold Kainhofer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Dienstag, 23. März 2010 15:25:55 schrieb Carl Sorensen: On 3/23/10 2:26 AM, Dmytro O. Redchuk brownian@gmail.com wrote: Btw, uncommenting page-count and commenting out system-count gives strange result: lilypond says Solving 2

Re: 2.13.16 crashes while processing old good file (2.8.8 and 2.12.3 do not)

2010-03-23 Thread Dmytro O. Redchuk
У вт, 2010-03-23 у 08:25 -0600, Carl Sorensen пише: The clue here is that there is some kind of break in the middle of the score that you've put in manually that confuses the layout engine. My fault! Just remove the /pageBreak in the middle of your score and it works perfectly. Yes, almost .)