Hello. )-----Original Message----- )From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore....@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore....@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of Reinhold Kainhofer )Sent: 30 July 2011 19:12 )To: lilypond-de...@gnu.org )Subject: Re: music function semantics ) )Am Samstag, 30. Juli 2011, 20:01:36 schrieb James Lowe: )> This is a bit too low level for me now. ) )Hehe. What David wanted to say: The parser correctly interprets the )syntax and properly sets the control-points for the TieEvent. So, his part )of current interest (the parser) works just fine. )However, there might be a bug later on when the graphical tie object is )actually created from the music expression. There, the control-points )seem to be handled differently for the two notes, even though both ties )have the same value assigned... ) )> So is this a bug or something else? (I.e do we need a tracker item or )> not?) and can we tie individual notes within in a chord or not? ) )Yes, we can tie individual notes within a chord. ) <c~ e g~>4 <c e g c> )It's just the tweak that seems to be broken in your case... I would say this )is a bug, although of low priority. )
Thank you. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1789 James _______________________________________________ bug-lilypond mailing list bug-lilypond@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond