Vladimir A. Pavlov p...@bk.ru wrote:
Well, there are many options in gtar that do not follow a scheme but just
serve
a single purpose. For this reason, they are hard to remember.
The current proposal would be covered by a general method in star:
errctl=
See:
Well, there are many options in gtar that do not follow a scheme but just
serve
a single purpose. For this reason, they are hard to remember.
The current proposal would be covered by a general method in star:
errctl=
See:
n Monday 23 of June 2014 21:20:28 Vladimir A. Pavlov wrote:
How can we solve this? AFAIU you suggest something like reusing
--ignore-failed-read for the feature in question (correct me if I'm wrong).
Previously, I was thinking about something like that ^^.
But --ignore-failed-read is not
Hello Vladimir,
On Monday 23 of June 2014 01:22:16 Vladimir A. Pavlov wrote:
It's sometimes useful to ignore errors tar returns if a requested member
is not found in archive,
yes, I think this would be useful,
For example:
$ touch file
$ tar -c file | tar -t file
Just a nit, here should
Hello Pavel,
Just a nit, here should be (for readers):
$ tar -c file | tar -t dir
Oops, thanks you. That's exactly what I mean.
I don't like the '--ignore-missing' approach. That adds another
non-symetric option to tar. We have the '--ignore-failed-read' option
which works for
Hi!
It's sometimes useful to ignore errors tar returns if a requested member
is not found in archive, while receiving other possible errors (corrupt or
absent archives, no space left on device, etc).
For example:
$ touch file
$ tar -c file | tar -t file
tar: dir: Not found in archive
tar:
