Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi tar community,
we are working on the xattrs|selinux|acl listing feature for command
tar -tf --xattrs and tar -tvf --xattrs (or --selinux, --acls)
and we would like to consult possible format of listing output even if
xattr support is not
Tim Kientzle t...@kientzle.com wrote:
YAML would be reasonable, or JSON or XML.
I'm not very particular.
I would like to see a written proposal for such a format.
If it looks reasonable, we could easily add it to bsdtar
as well.
Are you talking about the listing format or about the archive
On May 3, 2012, at 11:27 AM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On 2012-05-03, at 6:10 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
Something like that looks reasonable.
One major comment, though, is that the output of
tar should be parsable, i.e., it should be possible
to look at the output, figure out what format it is,
Hello Paul, thanks for your comment!
Something like that looks reasonable.
One major comment, though, is that the output of
tar should be parsable, i.e., it should be possible
to look at the output, figure out what format it is,
and parse it reliably. The current format doesn't have
that
On 2012-05-03, at 6:10 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
Something like that looks reasonable.
One major comment, though, is that the output of
tar should be parsable, i.e., it should be possible
to look at the output, figure out what format it is,
and parse it reliably. The current format doesn't
Hi tar community,
we are working on the xattrs|selinux|acl listing feature for command
tar -tf --xattrs and tar -tvf --xattrs (or --selinux, --acls)
and we would like to consult possible format of listing output even if
xattr support is not yet upstream.
There are few existing
Something like that looks reasonable.
One major comment, though, is that the output of
tar should be parsable, i.e., it should be possible
to look at the output, figure out what format it is,
and parse it reliably. The current format doesn't have
that property, but these extended formats ought
