07_05/albums/07_incr.1.tar
V- 0/0 0 2007-05-07 02:01 Archive: albums 2007-05-07
incr /home/Backups/2007_05/albums/00_snapshot.snar--Volume Header--
$ ls -l /home/Backups/2007_05/albums/07_incr.1.tar
-rw-rw---- 1 mrc root 148 May 7 02:01
/home/Backups/2007_05/albums/07_i
> -Original Message-
> From: Sergey Poznyakoff
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 4:37 AM
> To: Dat Head
> Subject: Re: [Bug-tar] gtar --listed-incremental silently
> failing again
>
> Dat Head ha escrit:
>
> > /usr/local/bin/gtar --version
> > ta
> -Original Message-
> From: MrC
> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 1:13 PM
> Cc: 'Sergey Poznyakoff'; 'Dat Head'
> Subject: RE: [Bug-tar] gtar --listed-incremental silently
> failing again
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: S
It appears that symlink extraction is broken in recent CVS versions of tar.
Here's a directory tree, with two symlinks:
# ls -lR /tmp/test
/tmp/test:
total 4
-rw--- 1 root root0 May 31 13:03 a
-rw--- 1 root root0 May 31 13:03 b
drwx-- 2 root root 4096 May 31 13:23 somedir/
/t
> MrC ha escrit:
>
> > However, upon extraction, symlinks a and b are not created
> correctly,
> > and become dead links:
>
> When you run `tar vxf /tmp/test.tar' you get the following:
>
> test/
> test/a
> test/b
> test/somedir/
> test/so
-0700 photos.dat
And yet, each tar file shown below only contains a label, and there
certainly were no files archived on the 19th or 20th:
-rw-rw 1 mrc root 346 Jun 20 02:01 00_snapshot.snar
-rw-rw 1 mrc root 147 Jun 2 02:01 02_incr.1.tar
-rw-rw 1 mrc root 148 Jun 3 02:01 03_in
> MrC ha escrit:
>
> > After a change was made in the source directory, an incremental run
> > should have picked up the changes. But it fails to detect
> any change at all.
> > Here's the ls difference for one of the modified files.
> The
