Re: wc reallines patch

2003-02-03 Thread Ulf Harnhammar
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Jim Meyering wrote: Have you had the time to look at my wc reallines patch? Thanks for the patch. I'm not sure it's worthwhile, but am willing to be convinced. Making your argument in the form of examples (diffs to coreutils.texi) demonstrating the usefulness of the

feature request: cat command line option to prefix file name

2003-02-03 Thread Vardhan Varma
cat -n is great can we have a 'cat -f' which will prefix each line wiht the file name cat -f-n will display as file:line:line --Regards [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Bug-textutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: wc reallines patch

2003-02-03 Thread Bob Proulx
Ulf Harnhammar wrote: The current wc doesn't really count the number of lines in a file. It counts LF characters. Aren't lines defined by newline characters? Isn't a file that is missing a newline really missing a line, that is, that last line is only half constructed? A partial line? I

Re: wc reallines patch

2003-02-03 Thread Ulf Harnhammar
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Bob Proulx wrote: Aren't lines defined by newline characters? Isn't a file that is missing a newline really missing a line, that is, that last line is only half constructed? A partial line? Lines in a file are definitely separated by some kind of newline marker (LF,

Re: wc reallines patch

2003-02-03 Thread Richard Dawe
Hello. Ulf Harnhammar wrote: [snip] If I have convinced you, I will produce a patch against the alpha version of coreutils. I'm unfortunately not familiar with TeX, but I can try to add some information in the manual as well. The manual is actually written in texinfo, which is not the same as