+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68921
Bug ID: 68921
Summary: LDAP SSL support unavailable on AIX after upgrading to
2.4.58
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.58
Hardware: Other
OS: AIX
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68913
--- Comment #1 from Ruediger Pluem ---
This doesn't sound like an upstream problem. Please get in touch with the
packager of said package instead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68913
Bug ID: 68913
Summary: RHEL8: undefined symbol: apreq_handle_apache2 at
/usr/lib64/perl5/DynaLoader.pm line 193.
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4-HEAD
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68912
Michiel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68912
--- Comment #1 from Michiel ---
Created attachment 39672
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39672=edit
Patch that adds RFC9110 status codes
Added patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assig
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68912
Bug ID: 68912
Summary: Use RFC9110 HTTP status code names
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #17 from Yann Ylavic ---
It seems that for ssh the connection is not closed finally (unless HTTP/1.0 or
"connection: close"), so the safe way could be to "goto write_err;" for the new
warning?
Reusing a connec
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #16 from Richard Hipp ---
I think the connections are always "close". But I'm not sure. Better to safe
that hit a problem later.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #15 from Yann Ylavic ---
I don't how the "g.url.isSsh" + Status header protocol works but I get that if
there is no content-length specified then there is also no body to expect, thus
you can keep the connection alive
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #14 from Richard Hipp ---
Implemented here: <https://fossil-scm.org/home/info/f4ffefe708793b03>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #13 from Yann Ylavic ---
Maybe something more explicit like this:
diff --git a/src/http.c b/src/http.c
index 0460e04d1..c71fde995 100644
--- a/src/http.c
+++ b/src/http.c
@@ -676,6 +676,10 @@ int http_exchange(
goto
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #12 from Richard Hipp ---
That is a reasonable suggestion. Thanks. There are other considerations in
play - that same routine is also used to parse raw CGI replies in the case of a
sync via SSH - and so for that reason I have
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #11 from Yann Ylavic ---
(In reply to Richard Hipp from comment #10)
> https://fossil-scm.org/home/info/a8e33fb161f45b65
FWIW, I think the correct check for the "server did not reply" case is
"iLength<0 &&
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #10 from Richard Hipp ---
Thanks again, everybody.
The problem was indeed in Fossil. Since the Fossil CGI on the server side was
always sending Content-Length in the reply, it was expecting to always get a
Content-Length back
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #9 from Richard Hipp ---
(In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #7)
>
> I think that Fossil's HTTP protocol handling needs fixing here:
> https://fossil-scm.org/home/file?ci=trunk=src/http.c=664
I agree. Thanks f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #7 from Yann Ylavic ---
Created attachment 39671
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39671=edit
Fix Fossil's HTTP protocol handling
I think that Fossil's HTTP protocol handling needs tising here:
https://fos
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #8 from Yann Ylavic ---
(sorry fat fingers => s/tising/fixing/)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #6 from Richard Hipp ---
Thank y'all for your time and analysis. Perhaps I was wrong and it is the
reply that omits Content-Length, not the request as I originally thought. I
see that the Fossil client does not deal well
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #5 from Yann Ylavic ---
Note: The response without C-L nor T-E provided by httpd when it cannot
determine the body length is what's described in in
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9112.html#name-message-body-length up to
bullet
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #4 from Yann Ylavic ---
I agree, for HTTP/1.1 httpd would send "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" but not
here because of the HTTP/1.0 request.
So the only option for httpd is either:
1. bufferize/spool the response to ge
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #3 from Joe Orton ---
I think it is quite reasonable that the server has no compulsion to send
Content-Length in HTTP/1.0 responses even if the the CGI script sends them, and
relying on that seems highly dubious.
https://fossil
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61817
detlef.pangratz@ing.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||detlef.pangratz
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68907
Bug ID: 68907
Summary: replace ap_trust_cgilike_cl with a validating CL
filter
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.59
Hardware: PC
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
--- Comment #1 from Eric Covener ---
The thread seems to be about responses from a CGI rather than requests.
I owe an update to https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/env.html to document the
variable (that we hoped wouldn't be widely needed
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68906
Bug ID: 68906
Summary: When a directory is named “core”, a bomb icon is
displayed in FancyIndex
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68905
Bug ID: 68905
Summary: CONTENT_LENGTH omitted from POST requests
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67860
--- Comment #6 from Daniel ---
I heard from Stefan out-of-band and he agreed to help support an update. I will
try to start working on this Soon(TM).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68902
Victoriia changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||PatchAvailable
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68902
Bug ID: 68902
Summary: [PATCH] Fixed args parsing in htdbm.c
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.59
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
--- Comment #12 from Ruediger Pluem ---
Proposed for backport as r1917010.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68830
--- Comment #4 from Yann Ylavic ---
It could be same issue because if the listener thread does not poll/empty the
wakeup pipe after the first wake up (which is the bug), the following wake ups
will fill the pipe and block indefinitely when
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68830
--- Comment #3 from thutop.do...@gmail.com ---
Not sure it's the same issue because the call stacks are different but I will
test it anyway with apr 1.7.4. I've not found a way to reproduce the problem so
I will have to let it run until
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68830
--- Comment #2 from Yann Ylavic ---
Or apr-1.7.4 which includes the fix too (r1819937 in 1.7.x, r1819938 in 1.6.x).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68830
--- Comment #1 from Yann Ylavic ---
Possibly a duplicate of bug 61786, can you reproduce with libapr-1.6.5?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68830
thutop.do...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|b...@apr.apache.org |bugs@httpd.apache.org
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68880
Mike Hall changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68880
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Jung ---
Please try with "--enable-mpms-shared=all" instead of
"--enable-mpms-share=all".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68880
Mike Hall changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|PC |Other
--- Comment #4 from Mike Hall
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68880
--- Comment #3 from Mike Hall ---
Created attachment 39657
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39657=edit
Associated config.log file
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68880
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #2 from Eric
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68880
--- Comment #1 from Mike Hall ---
In comparing the 2.4.58 and 2.4.59 versions, I'm seeing 3 modules missing:
mod_mpm_event.so
mod_mpm_prefork.so
mod_mpm_worker.so
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68881
Bug ID: 68881
Summary: Compiling current version of pcre2 into Apache-2.4.59
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.59
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68880
Bug ID: 68880
Summary: Missing modules/mod_mpm_prefork.so when building
Apache httpd-2.4.59
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.59
Hardware: PC
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68873
Benoit changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Endless Closing Connection |Threads with status endless
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #10 from Christophe JAILLET ---
Hi,
I may have some time in the coming weeks to finish what I started long ago.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #9 from Ron E ---
Still happening in apache 2.4.57, it would be great to have at least some sort
of workaround for this that does not involve compiling from source or using a
different http daemon. Any news?
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68873
Bug ID: 68873
Summary: Endless Closing Connection
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.59
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
--- Comment #11 from paolo ---
Hi Ruediger,
many thanks for the fix. When do you plan a new httpd containing this fix?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Jarosch ---
thanks for the quick fix, Ruediger!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
Ruediger Pluem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||FixedInTrunk
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Jarosch ---
(In reply to Ruediger Pluem from comment #6)
> Can you please check if the below patch fixes your issue?
I can also confirm that the patch fixes the issue on openssl 1.1.1. Our openssl
related tests P
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
paolo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
--- Comment #7 from paolo ---
Hi Ruediger,
> Can you please check if the below patch fixes your issue?
yes, it does.
> Can you check if adding explicit DH parameters (created via openssl dhparam
> 2048) to your certificate f
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
Ruediger Pluem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
--- Comment #6 from Ruediger Pluem ---
Can you please check if the below patch fixes your issue?
Index: modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c
===
--- modules/ssl/ssl_engine_init.c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
--- Comment #5 from paolo ---
Hi Ruediger,
I just attached the log you asked.
Here part where the connection fails:
[Mon Apr 08 10:00:13.507966 2024] [ssl:info] [pid 1597292:tid 140007736858176]
[client 127.0.0.1:37142] AH01964: Connection
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
--- Comment #4 from paolo ---
Created attachment 39653
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39653=edit
Log wit ssl:debug enabled
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
--- Comment #3 from Ruediger Pluem ---
Can you please increase the loglevel to debug and provide the output from the
error log when starting apache and during a failed connection?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872
--- Comment #5 from zermok ---
works like a charm. Thanks Eric for your help and long life to Apache and its
core team!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872
--- Comment #4 from zermok ---
(In reply to Eric Covener from comment #3)
> This is fallout from a security fix. Backend Content-Length is no longer
> honored.
>
> If you trust what generates the response here, you can try to
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872
--- Comment #3 from Eric Covener ---
This is fallout from a security fix. Backend Content-Length is no longer
honored.
If you trust what generates the response here, you can try to set internal
environment variable ap_trust_cgilike_cl
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872
--- Comment #2 from zermok ---
(In reply to zermok from comment #1)
> I confirm that event.bytesTotal is always zero with httpd-2.4.59.
sorry it's event.total
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872
--- Comment #1 from zermok ---
I confirm that event.bytesTotal is always zero with httpd-2.4.59.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872
Bug ID: 68872
Summary: xmlhttprequest.onprogress behavior changed after
updated to 2.4.59
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.59
Hardware: All
OS: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66421
Christophe JAILLET changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300
Christophe JAILLET changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
Christophe JAILLET changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66672
Christophe JAILLET changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
Christophe JAILLET changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|2.5-HEAD|2.4.59
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Jarosch ---
"openssl s_client" command to specifically request a DHE cipher:
openssl s_client -state -cipher DHE -tls1_2 -connect HOSTNAME:443
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
Thomas Jarosch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas.jaro...@intra2net.co
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68863
Bug ID: 68863
Summary: Requests using a DH-key of 2048 bytes are blocked
since httpd/2.4.59
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
--- Comment #1 from daffodilsw77 ---
Computer vision services
https://www.daffodilsw.com/ai/computer-vision-services/
Computer vision services
refer to a suite of technologies and software solutions that enable computers
to interpret
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
Marco Hald changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marco.h...@usu.com
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68860
Bug ID: 68860
Summary: Segmentation fault when disabling config with
SSLStaplingCache shmcb and two graceful reloads
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51471
--- Comment #6 from Jhon Smith ---
(In reply to tlhackque from comment #0)
> IndexIgnore does not seem to honor sections.
>
> It appears that ignore_entry is doing a literal compare of the directory
> path rather than t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68857
Abhijith changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
URL
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68857
Bug ID: 68857
Summary: bug
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67860
--- Comment #5 from Daniel ---
@Stefan - would a contribution to update to 0.13.0 be helpful? It may take me a
little bit of time & some support.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67860
Daniel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dan...@binaryparadox.net
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64462
Christian Kujau changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||apa...@nerdbynature.de
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68850
Bug ID: 68850
Summary: Successful Story of Every Cricket Team in T20 World
Cup 2024
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
Lodha Azur changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Keywords
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68835
Bug ID: 68835
Summary: The operating system to which you are alluding is
"Windows Vista."
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: PC
S
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68833
Bug ID: 68833
Summary: AH02426 & AH00567 should be logged as warning
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832
Bug ID: 68832
Summary: Hide Server Name From Response Header
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.57
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68827
Bug ID: 68827
Summary: FCGI must support flushing
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.57
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63262
--- Comment #2 from Chris Seufert ---
I have recently run into what I think is this issue with the following config:
RewriteEngine On
RewriteCond "%{REQUEST_URI}" !^/___proxy_me/
RewriteRule ^/(.*)$ "/___proxy_m
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57691
Yann Ylavic changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57691
Chris Seufert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63366
--- Comment #4 from András Parditka ---
(In reply to Felix Schwarz from comment #3)
> Can you try again with Apache 2.4.47+ and "SetEnv proxy-sendcl 1" ? As bug
> 57087 is fixed now I think this should just work.
This solved
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64339
Joe Orton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #17 from Joe Orton
101 - 200 of 53624 matches
Mail list logo
