+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Bug ID: 4
Summary: Request for crl fallback enabling
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
--- Comment #2 from q...@tenable.com ---
Just out of curiosity when do the trunk fixes get pulled into the 2.4.x
release? Or is that something that will come out in the upcoming 2.6.x release?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66656
Ruediger Pluem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
OS
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66657
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Eissing ---
No, this is for adding stapling information to TLS handshake to the client. It
will not help you with managing stapling of client certificates.
Sorry if I misunderstood your original question.
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66657
--- Comment #2 from davide schiaroli ---
Does this work if I don't want stapling? Example: In my configuration, i want
to use SSLOCSPEnable On, and SSLUseStapling off
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66657
--- Comment #1 from Stefan Eissing ---
There is an alternative in the `mod_md` module that provides stapling with
caching to disk and renewal before the stapling timeout expires. See
<https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_md.h
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66657
Bug ID: 66657
Summary: Support for OCSP Caching
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.5-HEAD
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66649
Stefan Eissing changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66649
--- Comment #8 from Barnim Dzwillo ---
The patched httpd runs without trigger for an infinite loop since friday.
So patch r1910331 + r1910441 seems to fix the problem.
Thank you again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66656
Bug ID: 66656
Summary: JS not loaded in script language - Jmeter ver 5.2.1
Product: Apache httpd-test
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66655
Bug ID: 66655
Summary: Error reading data from upstream server
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.6
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66649
--- Comment #7 from Barnim Dzwillo ---
Ok - I added the r1910441 patch and keep running the test over the weekend now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66649
--- Comment #6 from Stefan Eissing ---
Added to trunk as r1910441.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66649
--- Comment #5 from Stefan Eissing ---
I believe the infinite loop happens when the error is ignored, yes. That was
observed in the other PR.
But, while that will exit the loop, the connection state in h2_c1_io.c is still
in a inconsistent
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66649
--- Comment #4 from Barnim Dzwillo ---
Lets see - i am testing the patch now. If there is a situation where
h2_c1_io_assure_flushed() returns just once a status != APR_SUCCESS,
then the patch could help.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66649
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Eissing ---
Hmm, that would mean `h2_c1_io_needs_flush()` returns TRUE and
`h2_c1_io_pending()` is FALSE on your system?
Or do we have a case where `nghttp2_session_send()` always blocks, but there is
nothing
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66649
--- Comment #2 from Barnim Dzwillo ---
I can try this patch, but at first glance it looks as if this will
not help for this situation:
- rv = h2_c1_io_assure_flushed(>io) will check for
'if (h2_c1_io_pending(io) || io->unf
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66649
Stefan Eissing changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Stefan
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66649
Bug ID: 66649
Summary: apache http2 endless loop in h2_session_send in
httpd-2.4.55/56/57
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.57
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60503
--- Comment #2 from Marc Stern ---
What about a simple syntax like this:
Simple to write, simple to read, reasonably compact.
If everybody agrees I'm ready to help adapting the code and testing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #10 from Barnim Dzwillo ---
Hello,
the patched httpd runs without problems for nearly one day now. It didn't
crash and didn't trigger the debug-messages, so the bugfix seems to work.
Thank you again.
It would be nice
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
--- Comment #6 from Ruediger Pluem ---
I guess we need to have an option to deny HTTP/0.9 responses. I am not sure if
we could disable them by default for compatibility reasons.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|If apache is acting as a|invalid response treated
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #5 from Eric Covener
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
--- Comment #4 from shashank ---
This is the info related to app:
https://github.com/hmshashank/malformed-http
This is the related Discussion we opened in github:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/29167
This is the only info i could
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
--- Comment #3 from Eric Covener ---
(In reply to shashank from comment #2)
> Apache should return whatever response it gets from the app side. Because of
> the presence of the b' in the response body apache is not able to unde
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #9 from Barnim Dzwillo ---
Thank you for the fast feedback Stefan.
I applied your patch, disabled my workaround and kept my check-code active.
This runs for 30 minutes now, and nether my check nor the 'Denied to prevent..'
check
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
--- Comment #2 from shashank ---
Apache should return whatever response it gets from the app side. Because of
the presence of the b' in the response body apache is not able to understand or
parse that and by-default its returning 200
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #8 from Stefan Eissing ---
Thanks Barnim,
I was able to reproduce the problem and write a fix. Added as r1910386. Also,
this available in <https://github.com/icing/mod_h2/releases/tag/v2.0.19>.
Looking forward to he
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #7 from Barnim Dzwillo ---
Created attachment 38588
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38588=edit
combined check and workaround for h2eos bucket corruption (for 2.4.57)
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #6 from Barnim Dzwillo ---
I added a version of the first 'check'-patch for the 2.4.57 tree now.
Hope this helps..
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #5 from Barnim Dzwillo ---
Created attachment 38587
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38587=edit
check for h2eos bucket corruption (for 2.4.57 instead of trunk)
same as the first patch - applies to svn 2.4
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #4 from Barnim Dzwillo ---
I rebased the patch to httpd-trunk from the svn repo:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk
In the 2.4.57 version just 'apr_bucket_delete(bucket)'
is called instead of 'delete_meta_bucket
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Eissing ---
The first patch, the check, does not apply to your 2.4.x sources. There is a
"delete_meta_bucket()" function referenced that does not exist.
Is this some other change by your not included or d
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #2 from Stefan Eissing ---
Thanks for the report with the detailed analysis and patched.
I'll try to analyse what the root cause here is.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #1 from Eric
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
--- Comment #1 from Barnim Dzwillo ---
Created attachment 38586
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38586=edit
workaround for h2eos bucket corruption
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66646
Bug ID: 66646
Summary: apache http2 h2eos bucket corruption in
httpd-2.4.55/56/57 (with workaround)
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.57
Hardware: PC
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
shashank changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|If apache is acting as a|If apache is acting
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #35 from Pascal ---
(In reply to Stefan Eissing from comment #34)
> Fix added to trunk as r1910331.
Thank you very much! I'm wondering if you know if there are some special
requests that can trigger the behavi
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66640
Ruediger Pluem changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|HEAD|2.5-HEAD
Priority|P2
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
shashank changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hmshashank2...@gmail.com
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66643
李 <1557387...@qq.com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--
You are rec
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66643
Bug ID: 66643
Summary: After connecting to the CDN, the backend log of
website access records 403. The error log shows that
SSL handshake failed, and accessing without connecting
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
Bug ID: 66642
Summary: If apache is acting as a reverse proxy, and the
downstream service it's proxying for returns a
malformed response, apache returns 200, I would expect
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66639
--- Comment #1 from Giovanni Bechis ---
Sendinghtdbm.c
Transmitting file data .done
Committing transaction...
Committed revision 1910334.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #34 from Stefan Eissing ---
Fix added to trunk as r1910331.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66639
Bug ID: 66639
Summary: SEGV on strlen-avx2.S:65
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.54
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66638
Bug ID: 66638
Summary: SEGV in in apr_dbm_firstkey
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.54
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66637
Bug ID: 66637
Summary: SEGV in apr_dbm_exists
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.54
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66636
--- Comment #1 from ferry ---
OpenSSL 3.0.8 7 Feb 2023 (Library: OpenSSL 3.0.8 7 Feb 2023
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66636
Bug ID: 66636
Summary: hc https handshake tls1.0 (expecting tls1.2)
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.55
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #33 from Stefan Eissing ---
Yes, this patch should be safe on the last released version.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #32 from Pascal ---
(In reply to Pascal from comment #15)
> We also have problems like this (since Apache 2.4.55 - FreeBSD) where
> afterwards processes are in the "uwait" state and are using 100% CPU. I'm
>
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #31 from chris ---
(In reply to Eric Covener from comment #30)
> did you overlay one w/ patched version built outside of the distro? Size
> could be debug symbols?
oh yep, that be the one I built won't it. Not su
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #30 from Eric Covener ---
(In reply to chris from comment #29)
> Created attachment 38581 [details]
> mod filesize different
>
> Isn't this odd ? the one on the right (new server but same distro) is a
> much lower
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #29 from chris ---
Created attachment 38581
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38581=edit
mod filesize different
Isn't this odd ? the one on the right (new server but same distro) is a much
lower file s
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #28 from chris ---
Been running prefork fine for the past couple of days. So switch backed to
event just, and immediately start getting gateway timeout errors and everything
was running incredibly slow again.
The test I'm doing
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65922
Giovanni Bechis changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Keywords
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
--- Comment #1 from Giovanni Bechis ---
This has been fixed in r1875355
(https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_util_stapling.c?r1=1874579=1875355_format=h).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
q...@tenable.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||q...@tenable.com
--
You
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
Bug ID: 66626
Summary: OCSP Stapling with Revoked Certificate are not
Returning Proper Return Value
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4-HEAD
Hardware: All
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #27 from chris ---
I was just running some benchmarks between EVENT and PREFORK.
(EVENT)
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 6936
66% 7376
75% 7726
80% 7904
90% 8548
95% 8972
98% 9320
99% 9536
100
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #26 from chris ---
Isn't this bug report the same thing ?
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65180
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #25 from chris ---
Created attachment 38577
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38577=edit
Single G hung
Thanks.
The image is what is shown in the status as the current hung "G" connection.
This
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #24 from Eric Covener ---
(In reply to chris from comment #23)
> ah so I needed to type in backtrace then.
"thread apply all bt"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assigne
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #23 from chris ---
ah so I needed to type in backtrace then.
This is one connection which is stuck on "G". Rest of the connections are
inactive.
I did the backtrace a few seconds apart.
[Thread debugging using li
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #22 from chris ---
This seems new.
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
--Type for more, q to quit, c to continue without paging--
_
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #21 from chris ---
Ages later it chucked out this.
Continuing.
[Thread 0x7fd921ffb700 (LWP 177355) exited]
[Thread 0x7fd92966a700 (LWP 177349) exited]
[Thread 0x7fd91d7f2700 (LWP 177364) exited]
[Thread 0x7fd9227fc700 (LWP
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #20 from chris ---
Created attachment 38576
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38576=edit
More G hung
I'm not 100% sure I am doing this trace right, the guy who normally deals with
this stuff is a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #19 from chris ---
(In reply to Eric Covener from comment #18)
> The G and W are probably the same situation, with the difference that the
> process involved in G are trying to exit (and held up by a hung request).
>
>
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #18 from Eric Covener ---
(In reply to chris from comment #17)
> Created attachment 38575 [details]
> G-connections hung
>
> Another example how connections seem to get"hung". Currently on "G". Tho
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #17 from chris ---
Created attachment 38575
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38575=edit
G-connections hung
Another example how connections seem to get"hung". Currently on "G". Th
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #16 from chris ---
(In reply to Stefan Eissing from comment #14)
> My humour sometimes gets me carried away. I hope we have found the problem
> that is causing issues for you is what I meant to say.
Yes understood. T
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
Pascal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pascal.christen@hostpoint.c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #15 from Pascal ---
We also have problems like this (since Apache 2.4.55 - FreeBSD) where
afterwards processes are in the "uwait" state and are using 100% CPU. I'm
currently testing the patch you posted and will give yo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #14 from Stefan Eissing ---
My humour sometimes gets me carried away. I hope we have found the problem that
is causing issues for you is what I meant to say.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #13 from Stefan Eissing ---
Thanks for testing this. Looking forward to not hearing from you for a long
time!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
chris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #12 from chris
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #11 from chris ---
Created attachment 38574
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38574=edit
Patched hung W connections
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
chris changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #10 from chris ---
I am now
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #9 from chris ---
Thanks, I don't know how to compile stuff, but I might know someone who can do
it for me.
Indeed the connections which get stuck never seem to close, I have had them
open for hours. Its those which get stuck
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #8 from Stefan Eissing ---
Created attachment 38572
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38572=edit
proposed patch to mod_http2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Eissing ---
Thanks for the backtrace. In it, I see one http2 connection that tries to send
data to the client. All other thread are in `cond_wait()`, afaict.
Assuming this thread is causing the 100%, I looked
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #6 from chris ---
# gdb -p 182047
GNU gdb (Ubuntu 9.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1) 9.2
Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free softwar
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
Eric Covener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #5 from Eric
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #4 from chris ---
All I can really tell is, A connection opens to download something, mostly
small images. The connection sends about 50-60KB then "stalls". It then sits in
that state until its manually killed.
PHP time
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #3 from chris ---
All I can really tell is, A connection opens to download something, mostly
small images. The connection sends about 50-60KB then "stalls". It then sits in
that state until its manually killed.
PHP time
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #2 from chris ---
Added a new image. It show a connection (mostly they are from AWS) where it is
stuck on "W" on the same link. No figures change other than the CPU time which
just goes up constantly, but also consume
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
--- Comment #1 from chris ---
Created attachment 38571
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38571=edit
CPU usage
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66624
Bug ID: 66624
Summary: Using 100% CPU
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.4.57
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50669
--- Comment #4 from Olliver ---
@rpluem is this still true 12 years later? Are there no other ways to signal
apache without abusing SIGWINCH? Having apache exit after a window change is a
bit odd.
One work-around could be, to actually
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66615
--- Comment #4 from mkemp...@xtm-intl.com ---
(In reply to Eric Covener from comment #2)
> > httpd seems to not register that it has free workers even when I set
> > StartServers to 120
>
> startservers only controls ho
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66615
--- Comment #3 from Ruediger Pluem ---
Did you have a look at
https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/event.html#asyncrequestworkerfactor ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66615
--- Comment #2 from Eric Covener ---
> httpd seems to not register that it has free workers even when I set
> StartServers to 120
startservers only controls how many are created at startup. Every second,
min/max spare t
601 - 700 of 53657 matches
Mail list logo
