[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 --- Comment #2 from Ruediger Pluem --- In order to investigate further we would also need: 1. The httpd configuration used for the load test. 2. Information about your load test, e.g. URL's, frequency, number of parallel requests, protocols

[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 Ruediger Pluem changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO -- You are receiving this

[Bug 57691] mod_proxy/proxy_util confuses UDS scheme with HTTP scheme when using RewriteRule

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57691 --- Comment #6 from Yann Ylavic --- Attachment 38045 from bug 65590 is possibly more targeted since the "unix:" scheme is a mod_proxy thing only. Would that work for you? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #3 from Yann Ylavic --- Related to bug 57691 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 Yann Ylavic changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38044|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 --- Comment #3 from Stefan Eissing --- There are long HTML lists of some performance figures on their test suites. Does not tell me anything really. I mean you see that things are slower, but one as no idea what they do. -- You are receiving

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 Ruediger Pluem changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All Resolution|---

[Bug 65589] New: Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 Bug ID: 65589 Summary: Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47 Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.4.47 Hardware: PC OS: Mac OS X 10.1 Status: NEW

[Bug 65590] New: fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 Bug ID: 65590 Summary: fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49 Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.4.49 Hardware: PC Status: NEW

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #2 from Yann Ylavic --- Created attachment 38043 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38043=edit Handle UDS ("unix:") scheme is mod_rewrite Maybe the issue is that mod_rewrite does not consider that a "unix:"

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #4 from Yann Ylavic --- Created attachment 38044 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38044=edit Handle UDS ("unix:") scheme in mod_rewrite [P] Or maybe this one instead since the "unix:" scheme is a [P] thing

[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Jung --- You attachment is a Safari WebArchive and not usable for non-Safari users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 --- Comment #10 from Judea --- (In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #7) > So it seems that you need help somehow, please provide the requested > informations. Hence this ticket, and yes, will do -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #8 from Yann Ylavic --- (In reply to Sylvain Cresto from comment #6) > I have applied patch 38045 but it does not make different, it does not works. Please verify that you are running the patched version, I can't reproduce the

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #11 from Sylvain Cresto --- OK I've just test those patchs. Patch 38043 is the mandatory patch. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 --- Comment #6 from Judea --- (In reply to Yann Ylavic from comment #5) > (In reply to Judea from comment #4) > > Then download safari > > Then fix it for you.. sAfArI cAnNoT dO -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 Sylvain Cresto changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #7 from Ruediger Pluem --- Do you have traces for r->filename with the patch applied? Does the 38043 attached patch help? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 --- Comment #7 from Yann Ylavic --- So it seems that you need help somehow, please provide the requested informations. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 --- Comment #8 from Judea --- (In reply to Ruediger Pluem from comment #2) > In order to investigate further we would also need: > > 1. Coming soon, needs redaction > 2. Coming soon, needs redaction > 3. There are no changes other than

[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 --- Comment #11 from Ruediger Pluem --- (In reply to Judea from comment #8) > (In reply to Ruediger Pluem from comment #2) > > In order to investigate further we would also need: > > > > 1. Coming soon, needs redaction > > 2. Coming soon,

[Bug 65591] New: Standard + non-standard SSL port + name-based vhosts + SNI: Port number disregarded when selecting certificate?

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65591 Bug ID: 65591 Summary: Standard + non-standard SSL port + name-based vhosts + SNI: Port number disregarded when selecting certificate? Product: Apache httpd-2

[Bug 65592] New: mpm_event does not create new child after MaxConnectionsPerChild is hit

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592 Bug ID: 65592 Summary: mpm_event does not create new child after MaxConnectionsPerChild is hit Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.4.49 Hardware: PC OS:

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #6 from Sylvain Cresto --- Thanks for your quick reply. OK I have move RewriteRules in correct Directy section. I have applied patch 38045 but it does not make different, it does not works. With fix_uds_filename function from

[Bug 61818] OCSP "SSLUseStapling on" completely blocking the server when something is off with the responder

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61818 --- Comment #7 from Archie Cobbs --- We had a similar problem where nobody could login just now. The root cause was that DNS lookups for the OCSP responder were failing. Our configuration: SSLUseStapling on

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #9 from Sylvain Cresto --- Hi OK my bad, i haven't applied patch 38043. With patchs 38043 and 38045 it's now correctly working, thank you ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 --- Comment #4 from Judea --- (In reply to Rainer Jung from comment #1) > You attachment is a Safari WebArchive and not usable for non-Safari users. Then download safari -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 --- Comment #9 from Judea --- (In reply to Stefan Eissing from comment #3) > There are long HTML lists of some performance figures on their test suites. > Does not tell me anything really. I mean you see that things are slower, but > one as no

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #10 from Ruediger Pluem --- Only one of the patches should be applied. Can you please do tests with only one of them applied? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 --- Comment #5 from Yann Ylavic --- (In reply to Judea from comment #4) > Then download safari Then fix it for you.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #12 from Yann Ylavic --- Do you mean that 38045 alone is not working? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe,

[Bug 65592] mpm_event does not create new child after MaxConnectionsPerChild is hit

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592 --- Comment #2 from Matt Zuba --- Thank you for the quick patch. I've applied it on top of the Apache source for Ubuntu from Ondřej Surý found at https://launchpad.net/~ondrej/+archive/ubuntu/apache2 and it has solved the problem in 2.4.49.

[Bug 57691] mod_proxy/proxy_util confuses UDS scheme with HTTP scheme when using RewriteRule

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57691 Yann Ylavic changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|PatchAvailable |FixedInTrunk --- Comment #8 from Yann

[Bug 65592] mpm_event does not create new child after MaxConnectionsPerChild is hit

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592 Ruediger Pluem changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||FixedInTrunk, |

[Bug 65593] New: MDMessageCmd: event 'ocsp-renewed' is undocumented

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65593 Bug ID: 65593 Summary: MDMessageCmd: event 'ocsp-renewed' is undocumented Product: Apache httpd-2 Version: 2.4-HEAD Hardware: All URL:

[Bug 65592] mpm_event does not create new child after MaxConnectionsPerChild is hit

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592 --- Comment #3 from Ruediger Pluem --- Committed to trunk a r1893520. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 --- Comment #12 from Judea --- (In reply to Ruediger Pluem from comment #11) > (In reply to Judea from comment #8) > > (In reply to Ruediger Pluem from comment #2) > > > In order to investigate further we would also need: > > > > > > 1.

[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 Judea changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38042|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 65592] mpm_event does not create new child after MaxConnectionsPerChild is hit

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592 alex2g...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alex2g...@gmail.com -- You are

[Bug 65589] Serious Performance Degradation as of 2.4.47

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65589 Ruediger Pluem changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 --- Comment #13 from Sylvain Cresto --- Yes, in my case : Patch 38043 alone : good Patch 38045 alone : bad Patch 38043 + 38045 : good -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 65592] mpm_event does not create new child after MaxConnectionsPerChild is hit

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592 --- Comment #1 from Ruediger Pluem --- Created attachment 38046 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38046=edit Correctly account processes Can you please try if the attached patch fixes your issue? -- You are receiving

[Bug 65590] fix_uds_filename function seems broken since apache 2.4.49

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65590 Yann Ylavic changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Keywords|

[Bug 57691] mod_proxy/proxy_util confuses UDS scheme with HTTP scheme when using RewriteRule

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57691 Yann Ylavic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||scre...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from