Hi Dave,
Thank you for posting this information. The defect ID's for Cisco
customers who wish to track this issue via the Cisco Bug toolkit on our
website are: CSCdx88709 and CSCdx88715 for both affected release versions.
Thank you,
Lisa Napier
Product Security Incident Response Team
Cisco
At this point we are still investigating the possible options for a fix.
Thank you,
Lisa Napier
Product Security Incident Response Team
Cisco Systems
At 12:06 AM 01/04/06, Claudiu Calomfirescu wrote:
06.04.2001
Datanet Systems
Claudiu Calomfirescu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PIX Firewall 5.1 DoS
.1(1) we could use
access-list .
text elided
my 2 cents
Fabio Pietrosanti ( naif )
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
naif@Undernet #sikurezza
Thanks to vodka for her support :*
Thank you for your attention,
Lisa Napier
Product Security Incident Response Team
Cisco Systems
ht
of the two implementations.
We are still in the process of analyzing your other statements.
Thanks much,
Lisa Napier
Product Security Incident Response Team
Cisco Systems
At 07:32 PM 03/09/2001 +0100, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote:
Working with Cisco PIX Firewall i wrote some note about possible
testing and
details, which I did not have at the time.
Apologies, as I was not clear in my message. I believe my later follow up
message of 9/15/99 is exactly in-line with what Kenny had tested in house.
Just further clarification.
Thank you,
Lisa Napier
Product Security Incident Response Team
Cisco
order.
To avoid this problem, I would recommend using CEF (Cisco Express
Forwarding) which handles equal cost paths differently, and more
efficiently than the fast switching model detailed above. CEF is available
in IOS version 12.0 for most platforms.
Thank you,
Lisa Napier
Product Security