Since Mark seems to be listening on the list, but there's no reply yet:
let's make the requirements a bit lighter and ask some more specific
questions. I'll cut this email in two, since it is two different
questions actually.
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
I'm trying
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
Second question:
some of my MH users say that re-mail_open'ing a MH store will make it
forget all all removal flags.
Is this a known bug/problem/feature. Is there a work around or should I
try to fix c-clients source with
Hrmm, so what about the header? Do I need to format the header into a
string and put both header and body of the embedded message and set
body-contents.text.data and body-contents.text.size?
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 08:59:25 -0700 (PDT), Mark Crispin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Shawn Walker wrote:
Hrmm, so what about the header? Do I need to format the header into a string
and put both header and body of the embedded message and set
body-contents.text.data and body-contents.text.size?
Yes, if you're forwarding a message, just fetch the message as
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
Expunging a box will, AFAIK traverse all messages, look for those that
are marked for deletion and remove them. A side effect of this seems to
be, that all those traversed messages seem to get marked as Seen aka
Status: O (old). Is this a
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote:
But I don't understand what would be required to fix it. I can't see
the big picture. AFAI can see mh_ping is not changing the status of
messages.
mh format does not have any place to store flags permanently. Flags are
only maintained
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
But MH is the only format among those supported by c-client (except
support for it is so poor that it is unusable in practice) which supports
folders having both messages and subfolders.
No, there is also mx format.
It is also plain text (and
so is
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 10:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Mark Crispin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MC On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
MC But MH is the only format among those supported by c-client (except
MC support for it is so poor that it is unusable in practice) which supports
MC folders having both
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 11:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Mark Crispin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MC On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
MC Sorry, I forgot about that one. But AFAIK it's very uncommon compared to
MC mbox and mh. In fact, I don't know any programs using it, do you?
MC
MC Well, gee, you're
--
resending 'cause I never saw this appear in my inbox and I am not
sure if it was really delivered to the mailing list.
--
hi all.
I need to use gdb w/ to debug problems I'm having setting up
imapd in a non-standard way (is the
10 matches
Mail list logo
