On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Mark Crispin wrote:
Yes. A copy operation won't create a new keyword if the destination does not
already have it.
To be more specific: each mailbox has a list of defined keywords used with
that mailbox. New keywords are defined by setting a previously-unused
keyword in a
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Rich Graves wrote:
I guess this is more for the imap list, but this sounds like a bug in the
IMAP specification to me. Was there ever any working group discussion of
this? Is there any good reason *not* to want to create new keywords upon
copy?
I don't think that anyone ever
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Mark Crispin wrote:
Is there a good place in imapd we can hack Junk into the default keywords
available for all newly created (in our case, mbx format) mailboxes?
Yes, just write a dummy message, select the mailbox, and store the flags.
That's ok if you're writing a
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Rich Graves wrote:
Is there a good place in imapd we can hack Junk into the default keywords
available for all newly created (in our case, mbx format) mailboxes?
Yes, just write a dummy message, select the mailbox, and store the flags.
That's ok if you're writing a new
Hello.
When using the mailutil utility to copy mail/move from a folder to
another, some MUA-specific flags are lost, like the Junk or label flags
that Mozilla uses.
Is this a bug/feature ?
Thanks.
PS: version in use is 2002e.
--
Nicolas
--
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Nicolas Kowalski wrote:
When using the mailutil utility to copy mail/move from a folder to
another, some MUA-specific flags are lost, like the Junk or label flags
that Mozilla uses.
Mailutil tries to copy keywords, but (depending upon the mail store) some
keywords may not copy
