Re: mailbox format problems
I do this not because it actually _does_ anything but because I don't want
any trace of mbox anywhere on my system. I also delete all traces of mbox
from the driver list. Just because it is meaningless does not mean it's
wrong, AFAIK. What would be wrong for me would be creating an mbox mailbox.
We had so many problems with mbox at my last large installation of UW-IMAP
that I want it nowhere near my servers.
From what I can tell setting EMPTYPROTO to mbx is in fact meaningless but
won't hurt anything and will achieve my goal of removing mbox. I've run it
for four years or so with no ill effects. Someone care to comment?
n
- Original Message -
From: David B Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Nick Hodulik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Sebastian Hagedorn [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: mailbox format problems
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Nick Hodulik wrote:
There is a way. You have to dig down into the code and change
CREATEPROTO
and EMPTYPROTO from mbox to mbx. Assuming your in *nix you'll have to
go
to src/osdep/unix/env_unix.c or something similar to do this. If you
want
mail to live in a subdirectory called mail in each users home dir then
you
must change src/osdep/unix/Makefile to reflect this as well.
Before you tell people to do this, you might want to go read the
documentation to find out why setting EMPTYPROTO to mbx is meaningless
and wrong.
Dave
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.eduCollege of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_adminIowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include std_disclaimer.h
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
Re: dmail maximum mailbox size
I have been using dmail on various flavors of Linux for several years now and have never gotten this problem. I HAVE had this problem when delivering into mbox format-- at more than 50MB it just doesn't work. The problem in fact created the need to switch to dmail and mbx in the first place. Speaking of which, I have always wondered why mbx isn't the default format for mail delivery out of the tarball and instead have mbox need to be manually switched on instead of vice versa. Every time a new version of UW-IMAP come out I have to delve into the code and manually switch everything to mbx. The UW docs do everything but state that mbx is the uber-format for mail and that mbox sucks, which is the truth. Why not lead the charge here? n - Original Message - From: Bob Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 1:16 PM Subject: dmail maximum mailbox size dmail seems to stop working properly when my mailbox size hits 50MB. i have procmail configured to use dmail to deliver to my inbox, when the mailbox hits 50MB it stops growing which corrupts the mailbox. once the mailbox is full dmail delivers to temp files in the same directory as the mailbox. i am currently using dmail from the imap-2002e distribution. i have seen this behavior from imap-2001a dist as well. my host platform is solaris 8 SPARC. any help would be appreciated. _ Get MSN 8 Dial-up Internet Service FREE for one month. Limited time offer-- sign up now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup -- -- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/imap/c-client-list.html -- -- -- For information about this mailing list, and its archives, see: http://www.washington.edu/imap/c-client-list.html --
