On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Eduardo Chappa wrote:
There is no
way I can predict what a user will do when using Pine, and you must know
very well that ignoring a possible case is one of the main reasons why
users report bugs, so I would like to offer a full featured (or as much
complete as possible)
Eduardo:
I think what Mark was saying was that simultaneous access to an mbx
mailbox from various incarnations of pine MAY not work correctly under
an MS-DOS implementation of windows.
If only one incarnation of pine is running, the mbx SHOULD be readable.
If your users *insist* on running two
When I try to use Netscape Messenger with imapd it gives an error message on the
server that the Login is disabled...
Oct 22 14:13:11 mail imapd[32389]: Login disabled user=sean auth=sean host
=sands.beach.net [206.16.184.55]
If anyone can help I would really appreciate it.
--
*** Gregory Hicks ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote today:
:) I think what Mark was saying was that simultaneous access to an mbx
:) mailbox from various incarnations of pine MAY not work correctly under
:) an MS-DOS implementation of windows.
:)
:) If only one incarnation of pine is running, the mbx
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:52:22AM -0700, Eduardo Chappa wrote:
*** Mark Crispin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote today:
:) Once again...
:)
:) Simultaneous access in the mbx format requires meaningful file locking.
:)
:) There is no such thing as meaningful file locking in Windows 98.
:) Windows
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Gregory Hicks wrote:
I think what Mark was saying was that simultaneous access to an mbx
mailbox from various incarnations of pine MAY not work correctly under
an MS-DOS implementation of windows.
If only one incarnation of pine is running, the mbx SHOULD be readable.
